Posted on 02/12/2010 12:35:44 PM PST by syc1959
Being born in the United States does not even make one a 'NATIVE' citizen.
Immigration and Citizenship: Process and Policy fourth edition Under Jus Soli, the following is written "The Supreme Court's first holding on the sublect suggested that the court would give a restrictive reading to the phrase, potentially disqualifing significant number of persons born within the physical boundries of the nation. In Elk v. Wilkins 112 U.S. 94, 5 S.CT. 41, 28 L.ED. 643 (1884), the court ruled that native Indians were not U.S. citizens, even if they later severed their ties with their tribes. The words "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," the court held, mean "not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange." Most Indians could not meet the test. "Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian Tribes, (an alien through dependent power,) although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more 'born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,'*** then the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government ***. Id. at 102. It continues that Congress eventually passed legislation with the 'Allotment Act of 1887, that conferred citizenship on many Indians.
The fact remains, the Court held, complete and sole Jurisdiction. As I have held that being born anywhere in the United States, jurisdiction is required, sole and complete, and Barack Hussein Obama was already claimed by British jurisdiction under the British Nationailty Act of 1948, and as such fails the United states Constitutional requirement of a Natural Born Citizen.
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Barack Hussein Obama did not have sole jurisdiction under the United States.
Title 8 and the 14th Amendment clearlt state the following;
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof
Note: 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof'
Do you actually believe that Wong Kim Ark is US Law?
wiggie-tingles
Isn’t it time to get out your prayer rug and recite you
creed.
The Obot Creed
I believe in Barack Obama, the bearer of Hope and Change
And in his rhetoric, and tales of woe
Who was born of the mother Stanley, in a place unknown
In the sixth year migrated to Indonesia
He ascended to the Senate, and unqualified, usurped the Presidency
Who suffered under Orly Taitz and was slurred by racist birthers
I believe in spreading the wealth
Of the taxes and levies therein,
the loss of freedom, that cost doesn’t matter
That healthcare is free
As long as I don’t have pay
While were waiting for Obama to show that .jpg image you call a “birth certificate” to a court or some other controlling authority.
Waiting and were waiting and waiting.....
Gee, how come? It must be an Obama fantasy.
Just in case anyone missed this:
HAWAII Attorney General’s office REFUSES to corroborate Obama’s HAWAII Birth:
STE=Q
another lie,
The Hawaii Department of Health receives about a dozen e-mail inquiries a day about Obama’s birth certificate, spokesman Okubo said...she acknowledges: “I don’t know that it’s possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.”
So the controlling authority can’t verify the COLB as authentic.
To bad for you that it is BS. Even if it was true, it is not, the de Vattel citizenship definition the Founders applied to Article 2, clause 5 remains despite your sophistry. Obama is not a natural born citizen.
There you go, Syc. Proof that they know the COLB exists and is circulation!!!!
They are aiding and abetting the fraud... assuming of course you have all that evidence you insist you have.
So... when are you planning to finally get around to filing the criminal complaint?
They have my evidence. Thank you for asking.
As for no court has asked...don’t feel bad.
but after next Jan, when the next wave of Obama casualties hits the road, they will.
Another non sequitur by you.
When did the Supreme Court write US law?
Only the Congress can write US Law and to date the only time that a US Congress has ever defined what A Natural Born Citizen is, has been the definition the First US congress gave it.
Very well ‘You betcha’
More surprises for Obotland.
YOUR ‘Common Law” is not Constitutional Law as outlined and defined in the United States Constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.