I've been here nearly nine years and I agree with you.
So does it seem the man with the gavel...
...and the gentleman facing the camera.
Wishing that Obama had not been elected doesn't change this.
Posted on 01/14/2010 11:20:53 PM PST by patlin
So, did the framers really adopt a common law rule that automatically granted US citizenship upon birth as England did? Let’s take a look at what the US government had to say about certain children born on US soil at the time of the adoption of the constitution from recently acquired documents from the national archives. As I’ve stated in the past, one can not limit their research to such a narrow alley that keeps pertinent information from being brought out into the light. You can not define what ‘natural born’ means without looking into all the laws for all types of citizenship and therein lies the answer to the proverbial question: Is Barack H Obama constitutionally qualified to be president under the definition of ‘natural born’ citizen that was adopted & ratified in 1789 by the colonists?
(Excerpt) Read more at constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com ...
Listen, noob, your post at 9 says there is no such thing as dual citizenship.
You sound like you are having trouble understanding a lot of things...
Now you seem??? to be saying there is, (or at one time might have been) dual citizenship.
Until you get around to clearing your head out and stating a consistent position, well, I got better things to do...
I have been here for a year. And I stand by my beliefs that a person born here is a citizen. Now I said nothing, though you obviously assumed much, about a person’s parents. Should a first generation citizen be President? Of course not! But I think that any one born here is a citizen and has every right as an American bestowed upon him.
I've been here nearly nine years and I agree with you.
So does it seem the man with the gavel...
...and the gentleman facing the camera.
Wishing that Obama had not been elected doesn't change this.
“That is not a leagally recognized distinction”
Only to those who don’t recognize the Constitution.
He had qualifications for citizenships of Great Britain and Kenya on the day he was born.
No amount of Bull Shit is going to paper over the fact that hes a natural born BRITISH citizen.
Yes, He is president. Just as a thief who drives a stolen car is the owner of that car.
My daughter was born in the states ... and she is a citizen. But she’s not a natural born citizen because her mother has foreign citizenship. Obama is the same. His presidency is a fraud.
obumpa
I believe that U.S. citizenship is a fraudulent construct, something that cannot legally exist because the United States is a corporation and not a country. We can be a citizen of the state in which we were born and a resident of the state in which we reside but we cannot be the citizen of a country that does not exist. Legally, the states are individual nations who have unwittingly contracted with a fraudulent corporation.
Actually citizenship as it was framed at our founding as well as the ratification of the 14th is not of fraudulent construct. I do believe the wording of the 14th may make it appear as if the 14th took power away from the states but when studied out, that is not the case.
Because a law is abused and in some cases down right ignored does not make the law fraudulent. Study it out
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.