Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chessani BOI
DefendOurMarines.com ^ | Bob Weimann

Posted on 01/02/2010 6:46:37 AM PST by polarbear1605

I understand the Board of Inquiry (BOI) results are mixed and the recommendation is that LtCol Jeff Chessani is permitted to retire with his rank intact. I am truly happy that General Carparotto and his other two board members submitted that recommendation. I am very concerned, however, that this small crumb is a political accommodation to cover the possible administrative, political deception and trickery yet to come.

(Excerpt) Read more at warchronicle.com ...


TOPICS: Government; History; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: boi; chessani; conway; haditha; marines
HADITHA: LtCol Chessani BOI Results-- See, I Told Ya!

Bob Weimann | December 19, 2009

“The BOI Notification lists the charges that will be considered by its members. All the allegations are essentially focused on Article 92 of the UCMJ; Failure to obey an order or regulation. All the allegations state that he 'willfully failed to report' or 'investigate'. This is where they will get LtCol Chessani. The reason they will get him is that because the combat reporting at the battalion level and below is never good. The focus in combat is never, and should never be, on reporting.” --The LtCol Chessani case: Good news and bad news, mostly bad, Bob Weimann, Defend Our Marines, September 5, 2009

I understand the Board of Inquiry (BOI) results are mixed and the recommendation is that LtCol Jeff Chessani is permitted to retire with his rank intact. I am truly happy that General Carparotto and his other two board members submitted that recommendation. I am very concerned, however, that this small crumb is a political accommodation to cover the possible administrative, political deception and trickery yet to come.

The reason the BOI had to come up with a finding against LtCol Chessani is complex but centers on US Marine Corps administration and promotion procedures. Let me walk you through this.

Marine Corps Fitness Reports “provide for the periodic reporting, recording, and analysis of the performance and professional character of Marines in the grades of sergeant through major general." (see MCO P1610 Performance and Evaluation System; p 1-3). Marine Corps officer promotions are based on an evaluation of all their career fitness reports. Your fitness reports are what get you promoted or “passed over” (not promoted). Remember that the BOI specifically tasked the board members to evaluate the fitness report that relieved Jeff Chessani from command of 3/1.

Assume for a moment that the BOI found no fault with Jeff Chessani’s actions during the Haditha incident. LtCol. Chessani, upon SECNAV approval of the BOI, could immediately request the Board for Correction of Naval Records to pull the adverse fitness report (for the Haditha incident) that was used to relieve him. Because the BOI found no fault, that particular adverse fitness report would have no basis and would be removed from his record.

With the fitness report removed, LtCol Chessani could then request remedial consideration for promotion or a Special Selection (promotion) Board (see MCO P1400 Marine Corps Promotion Manual, Volume 1–Officer Promotions). In other words, Jeff Chessani missed promotion to Colonel because of the pending court martial through no fault of his own. According to Marine Corps Orders, he still deserves consideration for promotion to the next highest grade.

The special selection board is then required to compare LtCol Chessani’s record to the “least competitive” records of LtCol Chessani’s contemporaries already promoted. From everything I have heard about LtCol Chessani’s professional reputation and record, he would blow those records away.

Now here is the real rub. Upon selection to Colonel, the Commandant would be required to submit LtCol Chessani’s name to the President and Congress for approval.

Congress recently changed its guidance regarding officer promotions requiring all officers with a “connection” to the facts and circumstances surrounding the “Haditha incident” to be identified for congressional screening. (The word “connected” replaced the words “directly implicated of wrong doing”).

Folks, I believe that the Commandant, General Conway, does not have the courage to tell Congress that the Marine Corps made a mistake in the Haditha incident. In order to promote LtCol Chesanni, the Commandant would have to validate that the Marine Corps, General Chiarelli (then Commander of Multi-National Corps – Iraq and now Vice Chief of Staff of the Army) and Mr Murtha all make a huge mistake in judgment. For that reason, the BOI had to find some reason, some fault, whether perceived or real, with LtCol Chessani’s actions in Haditha.

The other item we must remember is that the Board of Inquiry only has the authority to recommend. Final authority rests with the Secretary of Navy (SECNAV), Mr. Ray Mabus.

The Secretary of the Navy is responsible for, and has the authority under Title 10 of the United States Code, to conduct all the affairs of the Department of the Navy, including: recruiting, organizing, supplying, equipping, training, mobilizing, and demobilizing. (See more here.)

Note that the words “war fighting” and or “combat” are missing from the SECNAV job description. The SECNAV has the authority to accept, reject or modify the BOI recommendation.

Mr. Mabus has a Harvard Law Degree, served as Governor of Mississippi, the Mississippi State Auditor and two years in the Navy where he served on the light cruiser USS Little Rock (1970-1972). I feel his legal background combined with no combat experience will not fare well for Jeff Chessani. Especially since the basic issue with the Haditha case is the charge, under the rule of law, of murder. In other words, Mr. Mabus may tend to agree with Mr. Murtha’s sensational charge of “cold blooded murder” in addition to rubber stamping any endorsement the Commandant of the Marine Corps submits.

The concerning part is that in order for the BOI recommendation to get to the SecNav desk it will have to be endorsed by General Flynn and the Commandant, General Conway. Both of these generals can make any recommendation their hearts desire regardless what the BOI recommends.

General Flynn has made his career as a Headquarters Maine Corps staffer. (The Marine Corps slang term for a career staffer is “staff pogue” or “headquarters weenie”.) Because he understands proper administrative procedures, I am guessing his endorsement on the BOI recommendation will read something like “Concur with the Board’s recommendation” and then he will forward it to the Commandant.

General Conway is a different matter. The rumor is he likes to smile a lot and say yes to his congressional contacts and his civilian authorities. Providing controversial advice to the national civilian authority in order to change a bad perception is not his style or in his character. In fact, he is more likely to avoid such confrontation than embark upon it. The question then becomes what endorsement will the Commandant place on Jeff Chessani's BOI recommendation?

Bob Weimann LtCol, USMC Ret. Former Commanding Officer, Kilo Company 3/1

1 posted on 01/02/2010 6:46:38 AM PST by polarbear1605
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: polarbear1605

Clear the damn smoke and make your case.


2 posted on 01/02/2010 6:51:34 AM PST by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

Sometimes we get way too much information and none of it makes sense. I think he is saying the Lt. Col. is screwed because nobody above him has any cojones. What else is new? Welcome to the new offricer corps of the U.S.Marine Corps.


3 posted on 01/02/2010 7:44:54 AM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: polarbear1605; 4woodenboats; American Cabalist; AmericanYankee; AndrewWalden; Antoninus; ...
Another excellent article by Bob Weimann on the BOI re LtCol Chessani.

Thanks for posting this, polarbear.

HADITHA MARINE PING!

4 posted on 01/02/2010 11:51:24 AM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polarbear1605; jazusamo
Folks, I believe that the Commandant, General Conway, does not have the courage to tell Congress that the Marine Corps made a mistake in the Haditha incident. In order to promote LtCol Chesanni, the Commandant would have to validate that the Marine Corps, General Chiarelli (then Commander of Multi-National Corps – Iraq and now Vice Chief of Staff of the Army) and Mr Murtha all made a huge mistake in judgment.

Mr. Mabus has a Harvard Law Degree, served as Governor of Mississippi, the Mississippi State Auditor and two years in the Navy where he served on the light cruiser USS Little Rock (1970-1972). I feel his legal background combined with no combat experience will not fare well for Jeff Chessani. Especially since the basic issue with the Haditha case is the charge, under the rule of law, of murder. In other words, Mr. Mabus may tend to agree with Mr. Murtha’s sensational charge of “cold blooded murder” in addition to rubber stamping any endorsement the Commandant of the Marine Corps submits.

These two paragraphs sum it up, at least from my point of view.

The real undue influence in the Chessani case, all the Haditha cases for that matter, has always been Representative John Murtha(D-Pa.), the Chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense.

It is Murtha who decides what the service branches recieve in funding. Murtha wants a Marine scalp from Haditha, are Conway and Mabus the weak sisters who will hand it to him?

5 posted on 01/02/2010 12:48:59 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; polarbear1605
These two paragraphs sum it up, at least from my point of view.

You nailed it, Smooth.

It is Murtha, the elephant (better known as jackass) in the room that started this fiasco of persecution from the beginning and continues to influence it. From past indications it looks like both Gen. Conway and Mabus will give him that satisfaction.

6 posted on 01/02/2010 12:58:25 PM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

So Congress protects its own thug and a fine officer lives with a blot on his record.

I dunno if this appealable by Col. Chessani. I would guess he would not anyway, for the good of the Marine Corps


7 posted on 01/02/2010 2:57:33 PM PST by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

A FReeper raised this concern shortly after the BOI ruling. I don’t recall the FReeper’s nickname.


8 posted on 01/02/2010 4:00:53 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Yes, there were several talking about it and I’m praying it doesn’t happen but it’s a real possibility.


9 posted on 01/02/2010 4:29:37 PM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

We knew all along they would figure out how to to screw the Lt Colonel. It was just a matter of time.


10 posted on 01/02/2010 8:02:57 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; jazusamo
These two paragraphs sum it up ...

Just now finished reading this article and came to the same conclusion. Nice to see I agreed with YOU, regardless how sad it all is.

Do I understand this correctly -- the SECNAV only served 2 years in the Navy, more than 35 years ago, and was elevated to SECNAV?

The real undue influence in the Chessani case...has always been John al-Murthawi!
Absolutely! Did they think we would forget if they drug it out for nearly 4 years?

Thanks for the ping, jaz.

11 posted on 01/03/2010 8:52:23 AM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Thanks for the ping, jaz! From the article:

Congress recently changed its guidance regarding officer promotions requiring all officers with a “connection” to the facts and circumstances surrounding the “Haditha incident” to be identified for congressional screening. (The word “connected” replaced the words “directly implicated of wrong doing”).

First time I'd heard about this. If true, then what's the point of the military justice system? Sounds like blacklisting by a bunch of cowards who don't want to be "tainted" by an incident that was over-blown by Murtha and a writer looking for his next award for uncovering a "massacre".

If this allegation is true, it sure sounds like undue command influence from Congress.

SecNavy Ray Mabus does not impress me......period.
12 posted on 01/03/2010 9:55:51 AM PST by Girlene (We need more lists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson