Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Hollywood, STFU." reviews "Sherlock Holmes"
Hollywood, STFU ^ | 2009/12/27 | Hollywood, STFU

Posted on 12/27/2009 9:49:27 AM PST by ct_libertarian

        Part big budget Hollywood Action/Adventure, part Victorian Period Piece, part Buddy Movie, there is one thing which “Sherlock Holmes” is not, a screed. The absence of any “message” beyond the story stood out to me as more memorable than even the fantastic interplay between Downey and Law as Holmes and Watson. While some might argue that the pervasive atmosphere of decay and filth portrayed in “Sherlock Holmes” might be a negative statement on industrialization, I would argue back that “The Good Old Days” had manure in the streets.

(Excerpt) Read more at hollywoodstfu.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; Politics; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: guyritchie; hollywood; moviereview; sherlockholmes; socialist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
"Hollywood, STFU." is a movie review blog.
They rate a movie based on how much left-wing bias it has.
They really liked the movie, "Sherlock Holmes".
1 posted on 12/27/2009 9:49:30 AM PST by ct_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ct_libertarian

Moriarty doesn’t care what the reviews say. Nor does Holmes.


2 posted on 12/27/2009 9:58:42 AM PST by mylife (Obama is a fine orator, and Janet Napalitano is cunning linguist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ct_libertarian

Thanks for the link to the review site. I checked on how this guy liked “The Blind Side” and agree with his review. It was a surprisingly good movie. I will take a chance on Sherlock Holmes too.


3 posted on 12/27/2009 10:03:16 AM PST by TheConservativeParty (Take back the GOP-RNC. Apply RINO-B-GONE as needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ct_libertarian

This is good to know - thanks!


4 posted on 12/27/2009 10:03:29 AM PST by ElayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ct_libertarian

Thanks. I’ll take achance on this one.

(I did not like seeing Holmes dishevelled in the previews. Alwys figured him for a natty dreser)


5 posted on 12/27/2009 10:06:17 AM PST by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ct_libertarian
Neat site - they gave Avatar 5 hammer and sickles! LOL

5 Hammer and Sickles: Reserved for the blatant offerings of The Obama Administration Ministry of Truth.

6 posted on 12/27/2009 10:06:34 AM PST by libertarian27 (Land of the FEE, home of the SHAMED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Naw. Holmes abode was a mess

That is Why Mrs Hudson was always exasperated with him.


7 posted on 12/27/2009 10:10:54 AM PST by mylife (Obama is a fine orator, and Janet Napalitano is cunning linguist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ct_libertarian

So he isn’t a drug using womanizer in the film?


8 posted on 12/27/2009 10:11:20 AM PST by GeronL (This is a tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ct_libertarian

Heh... I watched ‘Sherlock Holmes - Dressed to Kill’ starring Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce last night on TCM. I grew up watching the Basil Rathbone movies and have seen every one of his Sherlock Holmes movies a dozen times. To me there can never be another Sherlock Holmes. Watching anybody else try to portray Holmes is like watching Steve Martin portray Inspector Clouseau. Just can’t do it.


9 posted on 12/27/2009 10:14:44 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeParty
I saw it but feel asleep for an hour (due to Christmas Day fatigue)

But the hour I saw was good.

And for me, any movie with Robert Downey Jr. automatically starts with a 2 1/2 star handicap.

10 posted on 12/27/2009 10:16:52 AM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

No, he isn’t really a womanizer in the film. The drug thing isn’t played up but it is not new. It is referenced in one of the early Basil Rathbone films. I


11 posted on 12/27/2009 10:18:15 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mylife

The abode, yes, but Holmes himself, I think of Jeremy Brett’s portrayal


12 posted on 12/27/2009 10:21:20 AM PST by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Hate to disagree but this actor IS Sherlock Holmes. Period.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Brett


13 posted on 12/27/2009 10:24:14 AM PST by Mmogamer (<This space for lease>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ct_libertarian

I saw it yesterday. Entertaining movie. We spent the rest of the day trying to figure out who we would have cast differently....


14 posted on 12/27/2009 10:25:00 AM PST by TriGirl (Lurking for 7 years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ct_libertarian

Hearing a lot of good things about this film.


15 posted on 12/27/2009 10:25:37 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Best portrayals of Sherlock Holmes:
1) Jeremy Brett
2) Basil Rathbone
3) ?????
16 posted on 12/27/2009 10:27:33 AM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

A fine Sherlock Holmes series, yet there is that underlying sloth in his personal life and attention to detail of the case.

I think a lot of the film noir detective is rooted in this juxtaposition.

Its not really spelled out in the Jeremy Brett series but Holmes had to have a intimate familiarity with a lot of seedy stuff to be so expert as to see the details.


17 posted on 12/27/2009 10:28:22 AM PST by mylife (Obama is a fine orator, and Janet Napalitano is cunning linguist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Heh... I watched ‘Sherlock Holmes - Dressed to Kill’ starring Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce last night on TCM. I grew up watching the Basil Rathbone movies and have seen every one of his Sherlock Holmes movies a dozen times. To me there can never be another Sherlock Holmes. Watching anybody else try to portray Holmes is like watching Steve Martin portray Inspector Clouseau. Just can’t do it.

I think you will find that many (myself included) find Jeremy Brett to be the best. Before Brett's health declined, Granada TV filmed accurate episodes of 24 or so of Doyle's original stories. I like Rathbone in the part, but Nigel Bruce's Watson is an imbecile. I really only cared for Rathbone's first two films (Ratbone's Hound of the Baskervilles is still the best version of that story, IMO). Didn't care for modernizing the stories and setting them in WW2, etc.

Brett's episodes were scrupulously set in Victorian/Edwardian England, and they went to a lot of effort to dress Holmes and Watson as they looked in the Sidney Paget illustrations.

Peter Cushing was a good, authentic Holmes, too. Not looking forward to the new film, which looks like some sort of spoof.

18 posted on 12/27/2009 10:28:50 AM PST by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

I prefer Basil Rathbone as the super sleuth.


19 posted on 12/27/2009 10:29:25 AM PST by skimask
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ct_libertarian

I liked it very much. Robert Downey is all charisma (as he usually is) and Jude Law is very good. Rachel McAdams is horribly miscast; she’s supposed to be this woman of mystery and intrigue but she comes off as a dewy ingénue. But it looks like the filmmakers realized this and largely edited her out of the movie.

Guy Ritchie is one of the best directors in the world as long as Madonna isn’t anywhere around.


20 posted on 12/27/2009 10:31:05 AM PST by denydenydeny (The Left sees taxpayers the way Dr Frankenstein saw the local cemetery; raw material for experiments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson