Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canadian Physicist Blames Fluorocarbons for Global Warming-Predicts 50 Years of COOLING
The Lid ^ | 12/24/09 | The Lid

Posted on 12/24/2009 8:44:30 PM PST by Shellybenoit

... You remember those fluorocarbons, every aerosol can used to be loaded with the stuff until we found out they were putting a hole in the ozone layer. The fluorocarbons were removed and since 2002 the ozone layer has been closing and the earth stopped warming. Qing Bin-Lu, a professor of physics and astronomy at Canada's University of Waterloo took a look at the interaction between cosmic rays and chlorofluorocarbons and predicts that global warming has disappeared, maybe for the next 50 years

This peer-reviewed paper was published in the prestigious online journal Physics Reports, Lu, who holds a Ph.D. in physics from the University of Newcastle, reports that CFCs, the compounds once widely used as refrigerants, and cosmic rays, which are energy particles originating in outer space, are mostly to blame for climate change, rather than carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.

Lu says the world has been cooling since 2002

"the observed data show that CFCs conspiring with cosmic rays most likely caused both the Antarctic ozone hole and global warming. These findings are totally unexpected and striking, as I was focused on studying the mechanism for the formation of the ozone hole, rather than global warming."

..Most remarkably, the total amount of CFCs, ozone-depleting molecules that are well-known greenhouse gases ... decreased around 2000.Correspondingly, the global surface temperature has also dropped. In striking contrast, the CO2 level has kept rising since 1850 and now is at its largest growth rate."

But wait, does that mean those fine people at the CRU were wrong? Those emails show that they were really believed in that man-made CO2 theory. That's why they repressed any evidence that would prove it wrong. Please don't tell Phil Jones or Michael Mann about the study below, it may upset them:

(Excerpt) Read more at yidwithlid.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; co2; cru; fluorocarbons; globalwarming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 12/24/2009 8:44:32 PM PST by Shellybenoit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit
"..Most remarkably, the total amount of CFCs, ozone-depleting molecules that are well-known greenhouse gases ... decreased around 2000.Correspondingly, the global surface temperature has also dropped. In striking contrast, the CO2 level has kept rising since 1850 and now is at its largest growth rate."

This turd must be looking for another grant at our expense. That is what it is all about.

2 posted on 12/24/2009 8:50:03 PM PST by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Frankly I think the fluorocarbon scare was a scam. The patent was set to expire on DuPont and they wanted something else to replace it. No wonder the Political Class thought the Global warming scam would work.


3 posted on 12/24/2009 8:51:03 PM PST by Nateman (If liberals aren't screaming you're doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

I was wondering about the climate effects of catalytic converters today.


4 posted on 12/24/2009 8:51:08 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223

My first thought...:) Give them a grant and we’re into the biggest cooling period in the history of the world.


5 posted on 12/24/2009 8:57:18 PM PST by bronxville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bronxville
"My first thought...:) Give them a grant and we’re into the biggest cooling period in the history of the world."

And then they want more money to explain why. Follow the dollars.

6 posted on 12/24/2009 9:00:15 PM PST by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Its always somethin!


7 posted on 12/24/2009 9:02:17 PM PST by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Good grief. These climate “experts” keep crawling out of the woodwork with new theories.

They ought to all shut up for about ten years. Let’s see a single one of them actually predict something unexpected, based upon their superior understanding of the way nature works.

No one understands how the earth’s heat balance works, or what causes the ozone to deplete and then come back. The temperature, the ozone, the ocean currents, you name it. It’s all too complex, too interrelated, too vast for good measurement (CRU’s big problem). Solar effects, cosmic rays, other variations in outer space, volcanoes, and just plain chaos. There may yet be other factors that haven’t even been considered.

There is no shortage of arrogance in this field.


8 posted on 12/24/2009 9:02:24 PM PST by Rocky (Obama's ego: The "I's" have it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Shellybenoit

Bull Crap


14 posted on 12/24/2009 9:09:56 PM PST by bmwcyle (Free the Navy Seals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

You have a funny way of editing.


15 posted on 12/24/2009 9:14:30 PM PST by MaxMax (Obamao can't play in the Olympic reindeer games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

“As well, there is no solid evidence that the global warming from 1950 to 2000 was due to CO2. Instead, Lu notes, it was probably due to CFCs conspiring with cosmic rays. And from 1850 to 1950, the recorded CO2 level increased significantly because of the industrial revolution, while the global temperature kept nearly constant or only rose by about 0.1 C.”

Very Cool!

Link to paper
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.12.002


16 posted on 12/24/2009 9:18:03 PM PST by reprobate (Carter's Dirty tricks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Yes, CFC was a scam too, but not nearly as clever as global warming. The ozone hole opens and closes naturally whenever it dang well pleases.


17 posted on 12/24/2009 10:04:34 PM PST by HerrBlucher (Jail Al Gore and the Climate Frauds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Titsenass x 5....wow!


18 posted on 12/24/2009 10:06:28 PM PST by HerrBlucher (Jail Al Gore and the Climate Frauds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

So why did most of the global warming in the last 200 years occur before the 20th century?

It’s the sun, stupid.


19 posted on 12/24/2009 10:14:45 PM PST by Hugin (Sarah Palin: accept no substitutes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Doesn’t this guy know that CO2 is the only significant mechanism for global temperature control?


20 posted on 12/24/2009 10:15:18 PM PST by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson