Posted on 11/26/2009 6:38:43 AM PST by grumpa
Why Socialism is Not Compassionate
We are facing widespread ignorance of why socialism is bad for our economy and our freedoms. As conservatives, we must demonstrate that liberalism in all its forms, while sincere, is misguided. Our calling is not just to confront our opponents in the political arena, but to educate and win in the battle of ideas!
What we encounter in discussing issues today with Americans, is that many think socialism is good. In fact, they think that it is distinctly compassionate, thus truly moral. In this essay we will examine why socialism—and its compadres marxism and liberalism (“progressivism”)—are in fact immoral and inhumane. Conservatism, on the other hand, not only objectively produces better results for society, but is the only moral alternative.
First, let’s define our terms. Socialism is government mandated activities or government control of assets. Marxism is using the power of the state to take money from some groups of citizens and give it to other groups (“redistribution of wealth” or “social justice”). Liberalism is a broader term that encompasses both of the above. Progressivism is a synonym for liberalism. Because there is so much overlap, we will use these terms more-or-less interchangeably.
Ten reasons why liberalism is not only ineffective but indeed immoral and inhumane:
1. Redistribution of wealth is not JUSTICE, it is THEFT. Contrary to liberal thought, forced redistribution of wealth is immoral. True compassion is voluntary, challenging, personal, and spiritual. Government offers none of these criteria. While government may legitimately encourage voluntary giving—and encourage institutions that facilitate it such as Christianity—it has no moral authority to force people to give by the heavy hand of the state. (Helpful book: THE TRAGEDY OF AMERICAN COMPASSION by Marvin Olasky.)
2. Studies show that government is much less efficient at the same tasks as private enterprise or charity. At least one study(http://www.gerrycharlottephelps.com/2009/08/fed-govt-wastes-more-money-than-business-charity.html) showed that Government administrative costs consume 35-55% of the total expenditures. So in the health care debate, for example, if insurance companies make a 2-4% profit on sales, they are still hugely more efficient at delivering health care services than government. And unlike the profit made by private concerns, that 35-55% loss by government benefits nobody—it is essentially lost (wasted). Is there not yet enough outrage at story after story of pork barrel spending in Congress? How numbed does one have to be to fail to see that government by its very nature not only wastes money but is bent to cronyism and fraud? The government has never run an efficient system of any kind anywhere, with the possible exception of the military.
3. Every time the government gets involved in something, in the long run it hurts the economy. Remember that the government does not produce anything. So every dollar taken out of the productive economy (or distorts the productive economy) reduces the total output of the economy. When this occurs, everyone at every income level suffers. Further, armed with the power to tax, government fosters stupid economic decisions because it is blinded without a profit motive. A recent example is how the federal government—through both legislation and Federal Reserve policy—encouraged banks to make home loans to people who could not afford them, precipitating the housing collapse. One must be blinded by pre-conceptions to fail to see that any intrusions into the economy with Soviet-like utopian ideologies are ultimately disastrous to its people. The more utopian liberalism is introduced into the system, the poorer it performs. (Important books: HOW CAPITALISM SAVED AMERICA by Thomas DiLorenzo and HOW CAPITALISM WILL SAVE US by Steve Forbes. Also, watch this short video about how the government worsened the Depression: http://dittosrush.blogspot.com/2009/11/thomas-sowell-explains-great-depression.html.
4. Socialism reduces the incentive to innovate and produce. Capitalism is attacked by liberals as not compassionate. But the fact is, the profit motive is the engine that has produced every modern convenience. Just take a moment to think through the things in your life and ask yourself why they are there. From the food you eat to the products you use, there has been an enormous amount of entrepreneurial energy and innovation that has made these things available to you. Government, on the other hand, not only does not produce anything, it creates shortages. Milton Friedman said, “If the Government was in charge of the Sahara Desert, there would be a shortage of sand.” An example in the real economy would be government health care. It is a certainty that the currently proposed government takeover of medicine will lead to fewer doctors. In one study, 45% of doctors would consider quitting if Congress passes health care overhaul. Bright students, faced with huge costs to attend medical school, will choose other fields. Such is a logical outcome from absurd policies. If we cover more people, we would need more doctors, more nurses, more hospitals, and more clinics. Promises of universal coverage cannot overcome the reality of universal shortages—leading to poorer service and rationing.
5. Socialism rewards failure. Consider the takeover of General Motors. There have been hundreds of automobile companies that have failed in our history. Every once in awhile, the free enterprise system purges itself of the losers, only to be replaced by more efficient producers that have a better model how to deliver more goods and services that consumers want to buy at a price they can afford. It is suicidal for society to resist this trend. A key tenet of investing is to cut your losses and reinvest in more promising things. In an investment portfolio, nursing your losers leads to a stagnant portfolio of trash. This article explains how even our prized anti-trust laws and the progressive income tax tend to reward the inefficient producers and slow growth: http://mises.org/daily/3856.
6. Every time the government redistributes wealth the economy suffers as well—and even hurts the people it is trying to help! It reduces incentives for productive activity of both the classes from whom the money is taken and to whom the money is given. If a father continually takes money from a successful son and gives it to a slothful son, eventually both sons will become less productive and tainted. The welfare mess is a classic example of failed government intervention. We have 50 years experience that proves that oppressive utopian ideas of “compassion” only imprison the welfare class into perpetual poverty. (This book by black author Star Parker is crucial to understanding the problem: UNCLE SAM'S PLANTATION.) An interesting current comparison is Texas vs. California. Texas has a conservative philosophy of government while California has taken the liberal utopian route. Texas, as of October 2009, had an 8.3% unemployment rate, while California’s unemployment rate was 12.9%—55% higher than Texas. Who is doing a better job for its citizens, including for the working class? Watch this fascinating short clip of Milton Friedman on the Phil Donahue show: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWsx1X8PV_A.
7. Socialism and marxism reduce our freedoms, thus leading to tyranny. Freedom, we argue, is a legitimate end in itself—an unalienable right. This is the foundational principle of America’s Founders. It is no less true today than in 1782.
8. Liberalism breeds hatred. First of all, liberalism pits one class of citizens against another. It especially fosters hatred, envy, and covetousness toward the successful rather than admiration and inspiration. And liberalism breeds an attitude of entitlement among the slothful. Bitterness filters down in an organization too. I ask you to consider how you are treated by government employees such as those behind the counter at the Post Office or tax office compared to most for-profit business. In which setting are you more likely to get more personal warmth and upbeat, caring service? Perhaps related to this in some way, liberalism also often discourages faith in God or creates new gods suitable to a pre-conceived ideology. (Helpful book: GODLESS: THE CHURCH OF LIBERALISM, by Ann Coulter.)
9. Socialism and marxism ultimately lead to financial destruction. The U. S. budget death spiral in which we now find ourselves places us at a very serious risk of economic collapse. See our blog entry, “U. S. Budget Death Spiral”: http://offgridblogger.wordpress.com/. As Margaret Thatcher said, “Socialism works until you run out of other people’s money.” Let’s just consider the centerpiece of the liberal socialist agenda—Social Security. It is a madoff/ponzi scheme. It taxes workers to pay for those retired. There is no actual “Social Security Trust Fund”—even though this term is still commonly used. The liabilities of the Social Security system are unfunded promises to pay retirees. Together with Medicare, these transfer payments are by far the largest item in the federal budget, and are the primary reason why the federal government is on the brink of bankruptcy. The Social Security tax burden hits the low income worker’s budget the hardest. And studies show that if workers were to put what they pay in taxes instead into a conservative personal investment account over their working lifetime, they would have substantially more income at retirement! And they would own the account and thus have something to pass on to their heirs. See http://www.socialsecurity.org/reformandyou/you.html.
10. Liberalism destroys the Rule of Law. America’s Constitution is quite clear that there are specific enumerated powers of the federal government, and all powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states. The liberal agenda in legislation and court rulings has openly ignored the Constitution. Considering federal health care legislation, there is absolutely no authority in the Constitution to force people to buy something they do not want—yet our legislators could care less. And unfortunately, even professing conservatives are just as guilty. We are fighting two wars thanks to the Bush years—neither of which has been declared by Congress as required by the Constitution. When the Rule of Law is destroyed, despotism takes over. The result is predictable: If history is any judge, in time the Constitution will completely crumble into shambles and the United States of America will dissolve. History proves that the yearning for freedom always pushes man to demand the freedom that he is convinced is a God-given right.
Summary: Conservatism is constructive. Liberalism is destructive. We are not arguing that government has no role to play in society. We are arguing that there are usually constitutional solutions in the free market that are much more effective while being morally upright.
Mr. Meek is a retired investment advisor. Along with his wife Cindy he now runs a Christian apologetics website http://www.faithfacts.org/. He may be reached at cmeek01@msn.com.
http://offgridblogger.wordpress.com/
And to help use all of our various opportunities to re-educate Americans.
Congress authorized the use of force, which is the same thing as declaring war. Your statement is FALSE!
That's where it leads and here's the progression:
SOCIALISM -> MARXISM/COMMUNISM -> GENOCIDE
ping!
ping
Great read.
Nice read, very informative.
It should be sent special delivery to BO'R, also. He needs it more than the conservatives.
See my tagline.
Leni
I agree, and I think it should be sent out and published in newspapers. Very well done expose of liberalism.
Capitalism is the unequal distribution of wealth.
Socialism is the equal distribution of poverty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.