Skip to comments.Counsel for DNC Services Corporation Performs 3 Card Monte for Federal Court
Posted on 11/23/2009 6:09:25 AM PST by jbjd
click here to read article
I’m so embarrassed that my daughter and my son in law both graduated from UT. (referring to the video) ** eyes rolling **
Agreed; but here’s hoping you are better at divvying up the pie than I have been.
don’t know why, but the link freezes my mouse, and then the article takes for-ever to download, so I’m posting the entire thing here, it’s a VERY IMPORTANT read:
Bob Bauer, currently White House Counsel, was formerly the Counsel to DNC Services Corporation and Obama for America, Barack Obamas Presidential campaign. (BOB BAUER BIOGRAPHY) In January 2009, he defended Mr. Obama in Hollister v. Soetoro, a lawsuit aimed at exposing his client was Constitutionally unqualified for POTUS. HOLLISTER v. SOETORO (Mr. Hollister was represented by Attorney Phil Berg.) Mr. Bauer submitted his usual Motion to Dismiss this was not the first lawsuit aimed at reaching his clients eligibility but this time, seeking to take advantage of the opportunity provided by this lawsuit to end the barrage of eligibility based challenges both inside and outside of the courtroom, he added something new: a footnote asking the judge to take judicial notice of certain facts, which notice he would recycle to construct the fiction, his client was Constitutionally qualified to be POTUS.
Judicial notice is a term found in the Federal Rules of Evidence. It applies to getting facts into the court record and, once those facts have been added to the record, assigns what weight this evidence will receive. (For a full explanation of judicial notice, see the Federal Rules of Evidence at http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm.)
Simply put, a judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
Mr. Bauer wanted the federal court to take judicial notice of these facts.
1. His client, Barack Obama publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii.
This fact is true. But it fails to establish, his client is Constitutionally qualified to be POTUS.
The only such self-authenticating document his client publicly produced was that heavily redacted Certification of Live Birth recall, Mr. Obama re-named this, his Official Birth Certificate posted on Fight the Smears, the web site clearly advertising in the footer, this was PAID FOR BY BARACK OBAMA. But even if the document was authentic AND the information contained therein was true, at best this could only establish his client is a native citizen, but not Natural Born. Mr. Obama admitted right on that site, this COLB only established he is a native citizen and not Natural Born. (See, MODEL COMPLAINTS OF ELECTION FRAUD TO STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL IN APPLICABLE STATES, on this page.)
Question: Since Bob Bauer was motivated to stave off attacks against his client by trying to construct Mr. Obamas Constitutional qualifications for POTUS, why did he try to get the court to take judicial notice that his client publicly produced a certified document showing he was born in HI, when even assuming the fact he produced such a document also meant, he was actually born in HI; that fact could only establish he was a native citizen but not Natural Born as required by the Constitution?
Answer: Because if the court had taken judicial notice of these facts which implied his client was born in HI; Mr. Bauer could have perverted such notice into the meme, the federal court has now ruled, his client was born in HI; and, further, Mr. Bauer would have claimed, being born in HI makes him a NBC, propaganda which he and his clients, DNC Services Corporation, would have plastered throughout the print and electronic media. This campaign of propaganda emanating from the man who wrote the book literally on federal election law likely would have neutralized the mounting challenges to his clients Constitutional qualification for POTUS.
Anyway, while referring to this public production of a document showing his client was born in HI, Mr. Bauer did not submit the original COLB to the court.
Question: Given that Mr. Bauer asked the court to take judicial notice his client produced that COLB, for what reason did he fail to produce for the court, the actual document?
Answer: Because he knew that COLB posted on his clients blog is bogus.
2. Mr. Bauer wrote, See, e.g., Factcheck.org, Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obamas birth certificate, available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections 2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper).
These facts are true, too. But they also fail to establish, his client is Constitutionally qualified to be POTUS.
Mr. Bauer omits the name Annenberg from the proper title of the organization; and fails to reveal to the court, this group is sponsored by his clients former employer, Chicago Annenberg Challenge, information the court is unlikely to know, absent his revelation; and which financial relationship a reasonable person would expect him to reveal as material to the courts consideration. He also fails to name the Honolulu newspaper he claims printed that contemporaneous birth announcement. (The court could not know, APFC failed to name this publication which they not[ed], too, unless Mr. Bauer revealed this material information.) Recall, this announcement is actually an unattributed image posted anonymously on the td blog, which APFC admits it copied from that site to post on theirs. RUMORS, LIES, AND UNSUBSTANTIATED FACTS
Not surprisingly, while seeking judicial notice APFC noted this contemporaneous newspaper birth announcement showing his client was born in HI, Mr. Bauer did not submit an original of that document to the court, either.
Plus, notwithstanding Mr. Bauer has now asked the court to take judicial notice [Annenberg Political] Fact Check said the document Mr. Obama publicly produced is genuine, again, he failed to produce that genuine document for the court.
Question: Why did Mr. Bauer ask the court to take judicial notice APFC said, the COLB his client publicly produced was genuine; but fail to introduce into evidence, the actual COLB?
Answer: Because he knew that COLB posted on his clients blog is bogus.
3. Mr. Bauer asked the court to take judicial notice, Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obamas original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.
This fact is true. Again, it fails to establish, his client is Constitutionally qualified to be POTUS.
Hawaiian officials allegedly made this statement in late October 2008. Notice, the statement attributed to these officials does not include the words, This original birth certificate we have on file indicates, Mr. Obama was born in HI. Indeed, Mr. Bauer does not allege these officials said, He was born in HI. http://blogs.starbulletin.com/inpolitics/certified/
Lucky for us, the federal court took no such notice. Getting lay people to understand the fact that nothing in the public record establishes BO is a NBC, has been challenging enough, without having to explain the difference between these judicially noted facts and the lies Mr. Bauer and the members of the Corporation he represents would insist these facts actually mean.
Luckier for Mr. Bauer, neither Judge James Robertson nor Mr. Berg inquired as to where is this genuine document of HI birth he claims his client publicly produced; or the contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper; or the original birth certificate HI officials claim to have on file. (How do you suppose Mr. Bauer would have responded to such request from the bench or opposing counsel, for for production of that original birth certificate those HI officials said is on record?) Because Mr. Bauer is a member of the D.C. Bar and according to the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct, these examples of lack of Candor to Tribunal; or lack of Truthfulness in Statement to Others; or failure to display Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel could cost Mr. Bauer his license to practice law. See, DC RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.
Which leads us to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, 3rd in line of Presidential succession who, acting in a non-governmental role as Chair of the 2008 DNC Convention, swore in August 2008 Mr. Bauers client was Constitutionally qualified for POTUS in the official DNC Services Corporation Certifications of Nomination that were submitted to election officials in dozens of states to get his name printed on the general election ballot.
Question: Instead of asking for judicial notice of representations made by APFC, notice which at best could only establish his client was a native of HI but not Natural Born; why didnt Mr. Bauer ask the court to take judicial notice of Nancy Pelosis Certifications, let alone submit even 1 (one) of those Certifications into the court record?
Answer: Because he knew Nancy Pelosis sworn Certifications of Nomination submitted to state election officials are bogus, too.
Question: But given that Bob Bauer was willing to risk his license to practice law by tricking the court into taking judicial notice of misleading facts that, at best, could only establish Barack Obama was a native born citizen, anyway, and which notice he would have to message in order to dupe Americans into believing this meant, his client was also Constitutionally qualified for POTUS; why was he unwilling to risk his license on Nancy Pelosis Certifications, which explicitly stated, his client was Constitutionally qualified for the job of POTUS, judicial notice of which fact the court likely would have granted, and which notice more likely could have persuaded the public of the fact, his client was Natural Born?
Answer: Because at that time, Nancy Pelosi was his client, too, and under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct, he could not exonerate one client facing a civil lawsuit by incriminating another in criminal election fraud.
. . . . #8 is Important:
[Thanks, Fred Nerks.]
I am making several pies for Thanksgiving. I will post pictures...
Very important read indeed. Let’s get this out to the ping lists, and email lists. And if you can get to her blog some of the comments are worth a read as well.
Fred Nerks, thank you for appreciating the value of this work, both my posts AND exchanges with readers. I wish I knew better how to publicize my blog; I think if more people could wade through some of these articles, AND access the links; they would finally understand what went wrong with the 2008 election. Certainly, they would begin to focus on how to fix this mess, instead of getting sidetracked on minutia that makes for interesting conversation but diverts attention away from the core issue, which is fraud.
The issue of not granting the notice at the trial level was not appealed and it has not been renewed at the appellate level although countering requests for judicial notice have been requested at the appellate level by Colonel Hollister; you could check it out.
I have been saying from the gitgo that this entire case involves criminal fraud. I have been posting it and posting it yet as you say, the minutia just continued nonstop, especially among the attorneys bringing and defending these civil suits.
This is a criminal case and as such, the statute of limitations is running.
Everything up to now has been a mix of smoke and mirrors and stalling tactics designed to run out the time. NO CIVIL SUIT will stand up in any court. It MUST be a criminal prosecution.
Have you read the complaints of election fraud against various members of the DNC Services Corporation, sent to state A’sG in applicable states, with a request for investigation? The complaints for 6 (six) states are on my blog - HI, SC, TX, VA, GA, and MD - but I am sure there are many more states in which we could file complaints of election fraud. People need to look up the law in their states and contact me. (What state do you live in?)
Pennsylvania, and we have been trying to get attention to this. Unfortunately, PA is run by thugs like fast eddie rendell.
We DO have a fearless DA locally that is going after ACORN with both feet. I would do anything to move this into the criminal sphere of law where it most definitely needs to be.
This entire thing STINKS!! and badly!! I cannot believe that ANY court will NOT investigate this or get into the “discovery” part. What is going on here? Can everyone be bought off??? I mean every single Judge from every Court? Sure looks like it to me!! As God says “if the truth be hidden a little bird will tell it”. Somebody, somewhere is going to produce the evidence. The balls and arrogance of this freak astound me. CO
I believe like you MM, the court are being deliberately paralyzed for some reason. It should not be, since they are the third branch of government but let’s face it, America has been TAKEN OVER, and I mean even the Courts. Perhaps EVERYONE is for sale these days. No other explanation makes any sense. Most Judges would, normally, would never take this attitude. I am sickened at what this fraud is getting away with. It’s too America’s peril tho. It’s not just the Government that needs overthrowing, it’s the Courts also. They are CLEARLY CORRUPT.!! CO
Incidentally, is there not ONE CRIMINAL Lawyer in all of the United States that would take this case on? I can hardly believe that. Perhaps nobody has asked but on the other hand WHY should they have to? This is so clearly criminal. Is everybody afraid of this cabal? - everybody? You know you have been taken over when a thing like this happens. CO
I cannot believe that the good folks of Philly, in particular, have not risen up sooner. The fraud and CORRUPTION is obvious. The Daley’s are KNOWN criminals. They have NO problem with cheating. In fact, that is their specialty. That and thuggery. DISgraceful. The USA was never supposed to be run like a third world country but in certain place and now ALL places is!! CO
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.