Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GITMO NEW YORK. A TALE OF TWO JUSTICE SYSTEMS
Barry's Obamanation ^ | November 14, 2009 | Jesse Ellis

Posted on 11/14/2009 10:14:23 AM PST by 51773photo

...if one were to follow the logic of trying the Gitmo guys for trying to hurt us then why is it ok to fire back on them? Isn’t that wrong? In a Civil Court of law, what applies to one party, applies to the other.

Aren’t the soldiers being fired on, taking justice into their own hands by firing back? I mean after all, according to the Civil Justice System that the Gitmo terrorists will be held to, isn’t a person considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law? And if they are innocent, then what right do our guys have to fire back?

Why can’t the Gitmo guys say that two different rules of law are being used? One used by our guys that say it is ok to shoot someone who is trying to shoot you (Rules of Engagement), but another law for those who try to kill our guys? (Right to face your Accuser)

By firing back aren’t they becoming Judge and Jury, thereby possibly doing harm to the other guy? Aren’t they denying due process to the other guys and denying them of their rights as accused terrorist?

Keeping in mind that the whole idea of trying a combatant in a civil court is insane, why would it not be fair for each and every terrorist that has ever been harmed by an American Soldier have to right to sue the United States for bodily harm and emotional distress?

Why are people of Iraq not able to sue for losses of income,destruction of property, destruction of their environment, denial of their Human Rights?

Why can’t terrorists sue for the loss of their right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression, not to mention the loss of their right to make a ...

(Excerpt) Read more at barrysobamanation.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: gitmo; newyork

1 posted on 11/14/2009 10:14:24 AM PST by 51773photo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 51773photo
The real question here.....the only question that is worth asking and for sure, the only one for which we need answers is: how do we stop this from happening???

How do we put enough pressure on the sham atty general to reverse his decision and put this back into the hands of the military where it belongs.

Really....how do we do this?

2 posted on 11/14/2009 10:38:26 AM PST by Logic n' Reason (If you always do what you always did, you'll always get what you always got.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 51773photo

What are the charges from Holder?


3 posted on 11/14/2009 11:03:28 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson