Did Judge Land Sanction Taitz to Cover Up Obama’s Criminal Activity in Georgia?

Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire ^ | Sunday, October 18, 2009 | Susan Daniels

[Brown Deer]

Did Judge Clay D. Land sanction me $20,000 in order to silence me and cover up Obama’s criminal activity in GA.

Please, notice that Obama used 2 social security numbers of other individuals in Land’s hometown of Columbus GA. Any judge with integrity and any respect for the law and the Constitution not only would not sanction me and would grant me further discovery, but would sua sponte forward a copy of the pleadings to the local DA, to Atty Gen of GA , local US atty, police and FBI for criminal inveastigation .

Additionally now there is a mountain of evidence of illegal activity in relation to Michelle Obama. National databases show her going by different last names in association with the same social security number xxx-xx-2302, born 09.03.66. We have her under the names of Michelle Meyers and Michelle Paton in national databases in Alfaretta, GA, Atlanta GA and Suwanee GA as well as numerous other locations around the Nation, such as Owatonna MN and Port Jefferson NY.

Interesting observation:

There is a sale of a house in Alfaretta, GA parcel 22-4952-1050-115 at 225 Relais trce, Alfaretta GA. The sellers are Michelle and Fred Meyers. Social security number used, is one used by Michelle all her life xxx-xx-2302 (I am not allowed to publish the full birth certificates number, I have to redact it. The full number can be published only for the deceased). Who is Fred Meyers, listed on the deed with Michelle? Did Obama go by that name? Is this a real sale of a real house or was it a banking money laundering transaction used with a bogus name and address? Why is our worthless department of Justice (Injustice) and FBI (as in FalseBirthcertificates and Ids) doesn’t do a thing to investigate this criminal activity and bring Obamas to justice.

I don’t know if you have these complete SSNs for Obama:

xxx-xx–6554 1000 NW 33 Ave., Forth Worth, TX

485-40-5154 (Deceased) 83775 Bates Rd., Jackson, NJ

xxx-xx–2965 and xxx-xx-2961 505 Farr C, Columbus, GA

799-89-7090 111 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, UT

xxx-xx-8765 1236 Po Box, Provo, UT

xx-xx-2302 5450 S East View Park 1, Chicago, IL

None of these are from Hawaii. Those all start with 575 or 576.

[GilGil]

True the timeline was a bit off.

It still does not matter. You are arguing a timeline and not the facts. With the exception of a few, attorneys and judges are a self serving bunch. They care about fees and power.

The more you argue, the more you make my points for me.

[GilGil]

You have lost the argument for all to see.

Your only fallback now is to label me crit and whatever else. That is a classic lawyer’s strategy. When there is no way of winning the argument simply stomp your feet and pound on the table and throw a tantrum.

Match, set and point.

[MHGinTN]

There is an odd method of forwarding money associated with Islamic banking. Could we be tapping into a money laundering method utilizing real estate parcels created as fronts for profiling sumps for funhds being transferred from an Islamic source to Islamic contacts/funding points? If cash transactions for listed property cover the entire price and no title insurance is applied for, is an inspecvtor even going to be called in?

[ctdonath2]

some things are more important than spelling

Not when you're accusing someone in court of fraud, and you can't even get the town name right. It's "Alpharetta". If you can't get simple key details right, others will have a hard time taking you seriously. An occasional typo, fine - but she was _consistent_ in getting it wrong.

(Posted from Alpharetta GA.)

[Publius Valerius]

One can tell that you have zero experience in court. You would not make such a stupid statement. Court pleadings are often full of mistakes and there is a very good reason why.

It is understood that no one really reads them.

Pleadings from crappy lawyers are "full of mistakes." Pleadings from good lawyers do not contain mistakes. I suppose that you were too busy in court to have seen the story I'm about to post, but please follow the below link to a story about a federal judge denying an unopposed motion to dismiss due to grammatical errors in the pleadings. The judge called it "nearly incomprehensible." Of course, they never really read those things--or at least so I hear.

http://www.abajournal.com/weekly/judge_labels_lawyers_motion_nearly_incomprehensible_marks_up_errors

[ctdonath2]

Sometimes the best thing someone can do is nothing. Her mistakes, odd rhetoric, and legal mis-steps are costing the investigation far more than she is helping. Those who sanely want to help can’t because they have to keep ducking/cleaning all the stuff being flung.

[danamco]

Are you will to do that???

[GilGil]

Pleadings from good lawyers have no mistakes. What a joke. With the exception of a handful, there are no good lawyers. To say that good lawyers make no mistakes is ridiculous. Good lawyers try to get away with as many mistakes as possible.

To then post an article from the aba is like asking thieves to condemn theft. What a joke.

The harder you try to come up with arguments, the more you bury yourself.

[Publius Valerius]

Pleadings from good lawyers have no mistakes. What a joke. With the exception of a handful, there are no good lawyers.

So what does this have to with what I said? I agree that there are relatively few good lawyers compared the number of lawyers out there. But, one of the qualities of a good lawyer is that he does not file pleadings with mistakes.

You also, wrongly, stated that pleadings don't get read. I pointed you to a recent example from a federal court in Florida. Since you seem to have a problem with the news article, I'll point you to a PDF of the order:

http://abovethelaw.com/2009/09/21/Nault%20v%20Evangelical%20Lutheran%20Full.pdf

So tell me, smart guy: how does a pleading that never gets read get returned to the lawyer all marked up?

[Publius Valerius]

I know of one specific judge sitting on the 7th Circuit who works weekends

I think that you would find that this is a pretty common practice for federal judges. By and large, the federal judiciary contains sharp, hard working people. In my experience, weekends and holidays are par for the course.

[El Sordo]

“I did not come to that conclusion. What led you to believe that I did?”

Fair enough.

That was an assumption on my part, I apologize if it was incorrect.

[browardchad]

Good explanation.

Why entertain logic, though, when conspiracies are so much more entertaining? /sarc

[GilGil]

The point is that even if a pleading gets read, attorneys get so many do overs that in the end it does not matter.

The only thing that matters is face time with the judge. You are arguing for browny points, when the war is waged in court.

You are sending out red herrings. Nice try!

[vikk]

I think one truism that cuts across all professional discourse is that a large amount of misspellings in an official document=an unprofessional person.

You also stated that pleadings from good lawyers have no mistakes. Does that make Orly a good lawyer? You seem to contradict yourself in your statement later when you say that “good lawyers try to get away with as many mistakes as possible.”

This is confusing. Which is it?

[r9etb]

Uh, no, Orly. He sanctioned you because you’re a fruitloop who can’t seem to learn lessons that don’t involve the application of a 2x4.

[Neidermeyer]

I’m not here to spoon feed you ,, do some digging yourself.

[Publius Valerius]

The point is that even if a pleading gets read, attorneys get so many do overs that in the end it does not matter.

So now you're changing the story? First it was that they never get read--now it's that they get read, but it doesn't matter because they get "do overs."

Yeah, I guess all those cases bounced on 12(b) and 12(c) motions don't matter.

The only thing that matters is face time with the judge.

Nonsense. I've litigated umpteen cases where I've never even seen the judge. While it certainly varies from judge to judge, in my district, you'd be lucky to see your judge before the final pretrial.

[GilGil]

You go to trial and you never see the judge. That’s a good one.

Still all the pleadings are crap and the lawyers make back alley deals to serve them. Give me a break.

The point is that if the pleadings are read and they don’t make sense then the attorneys get all kinds of time to do over at the client’s expense of course.

In the end the attorneys are only worried about whether the client can go the distance or how much money there is to soak up. Once the money is gone, then the back alley deals start. Be honest.

Outside of that the attoneys are worried about the judges and other fellow attorneys. The important thing is to keep relations good with this group to make the sweetest deals.

In the end just about all attorneys are self serving swamp critters who could not care less about pleadings or pretty language.

If you are an attorney it does not surprise me because of what you say. You are typical and unflattering to yourself plus you give off those sleazy attorney vibes. Eeeeeeccchhhh!.

[1rudeboy]

The point is that if the pleadings are read and they don’t make sense then the attorneys get all kinds of time to do over at the client’s expense of course.
Please tell me the jurisdiction where this occurs. I need a job, and don't have the qualifications.

In the end the attorneys are only worried about whether the client can go the distance or how much money there is to soak up. Once the money is gone, then the back alley deals start. Be honest.
Sorry that your divorce didn't end well.