Did Judge Land Sanction Taitz to Cover Up Obama’s Criminal Activity in Georgia?

Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire ^ | Sunday, October 18, 2009 | Susan Daniels

[Brown Deer]

Did Judge Clay D. Land sanction me $20,000 in order to silence me and cover up Obama’s criminal activity in GA.

Please, notice that Obama used 2 social security numbers of other individuals in Land’s hometown of Columbus GA. Any judge with integrity and any respect for the law and the Constitution not only would not sanction me and would grant me further discovery, but would sua sponte forward a copy of the pleadings to the local DA, to Atty Gen of GA , local US atty, police and FBI for criminal inveastigation .

Additionally now there is a mountain of evidence of illegal activity in relation to Michelle Obama. National databases show her going by different last names in association with the same social security number xxx-xx-2302, born 09.03.66. We have her under the names of Michelle Meyers and Michelle Paton in national databases in Alfaretta, GA, Atlanta GA and Suwanee GA as well as numerous other locations around the Nation, such as Owatonna MN and Port Jefferson NY.

Interesting observation:

There is a sale of a house in Alfaretta, GA parcel 22-4952-1050-115 at 225 Relais trce, Alfaretta GA. The sellers are Michelle and Fred Meyers. Social security number used, is one used by Michelle all her life xxx-xx-2302 (I am not allowed to publish the full birth certificates number, I have to redact it. The full number can be published only for the deceased). Who is Fred Meyers, listed on the deed with Michelle? Did Obama go by that name? Is this a real sale of a real house or was it a banking money laundering transaction used with a bogus name and address? Why is our worthless department of Justice (Injustice) and FBI (as in FalseBirthcertificates and Ids) doesn’t do a thing to investigate this criminal activity and bring Obamas to justice.

I don’t know if you have these complete SSNs for Obama:

xxx-xx–6554 1000 NW 33 Ave., Forth Worth, TX

485-40-5154 (Deceased) 83775 Bates Rd., Jackson, NJ

xxx-xx–2965 and xxx-xx-2961 505 Farr C, Columbus, GA

799-89-7090 111 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, UT

xxx-xx-8765 1236 Po Box, Provo, UT

xx-xx-2302 5450 S East View Park 1, Chicago, IL

None of these are from Hawaii. Those all start with 575 or 576.

[1rudeboy]

She says that she's interested in the truth, but I find that hard to believe, since she has not contributed anything of value here.

That's funny, because it's exactly what Judge Land said of Taitz.

[OldDeckHand]

"I don't think this kind of inaccuracy helps conservative causes."

While the ARDC does say "voluntary" innactive, it also says...

"No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status."

(emphasis added)

The last thing anyone could accuse me of being on these threads is a "birhter". But, something just doesn't smell right with respect to Michelle's license. I went to law school right next to Illinois, and I know plenty of people that were formerly licensed in IL, but have let their licenses lapse for a variety of reasons. When researching them, none of them have that malpractice caveat attached to their ARDC entry.

I suspect that their was some kind of disciplinary actions against her, and she chose to voluntarily surrender her license, and the state left it at that, which is fairly common in the other states in which I'm familiar and licensed.

[Brown Deer]

Michelle Obama Disciplined?

In December 2008, another blogger, through some hard work and sleuthing, found a form filed with the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) of the Supreme Court of Illinois. The form says that Michelle Obama is "Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law." The questions: why would Michelle give up her law license only 4 years after passing the bar, and was she disciplined, because, after all, the form was a "disciplinary record. Did she chose to go inactive rather than face a more public investigation? Just to repeat, the form said it was a "Disciplinary Record."

Through the ARDC, Stuter received a document concerning the First Lady's "decertification" as an attorney. Stuter was told that at the time Michelle "surrendered" her license to practice law, there was only one avenue to do so through the ARDC. The ARDC told Ms. Stuter that the only way to surrender a license was to do it through ARDC Rule 770 - which says that it is a "disciplinary" proceeding.

Rule 770 deals with NOTHING BUT DISCIPLINE

[Brown Deer]

Do you think that Jean might be Taitz?

[Neidermeyer]

When "voluntary" means nothing more than you have received "an offer you can't refuse" it's meaning is clear. In my job I have fired about a dozen doctors ,, all of them officially left "voluntarily" .

The link I provided wasn't meant to be the "Alpha and the Omega" ,, it was just meant to show that YOU can look this stuff up yourself ,, it has been discovered long ago and discussed far and wide. I am not the "oracle of links" here to do your research ,, I have looked into it myself and it has been proven to my satisfaction.

[TheBigJ]

Where’s the link/info concerning insurance fraud and the 1st Tranny?

[sometime lurker]

Ok, thanks for the information. I’d like to know more about that part of it, too.

[LucyT]

.

. . . . to #143. .

[sometime lurker]

Since your post said “involuntary” and the official link said “voluntary,” I could not help thinking there was an inaccuracy after I did the research. If you have more information, I’d be happy to hear it, or if you want to point toward the source, I’ll research it myself.

[sometime lurker]

Still trying to research this as Neidemeyer suggested - but I'm not in the profession. Does this link tell us anything?

Hmm, here's a WND article on it, which makes it sound like all attorneys who went inactive before 1999 had to use this procedure. Am I reading this right?

[LorenC]

Donofrio actually appears reasonably sane,

"Appears," indeed. Take a gander at Leo's epic story. Chapter 1 begins:

I am not Lee D'onofrio or Burnweed.

Those are names of the body I have used as a spacesuit to appear here before you on planet Earth.

My real name is The Paraclete. And Reni IS The Messiah. The Paraclete aka The Spirit of Truth, aka The Holy Spirit is the third person of Trinity. As Jesus stated in the Gospel of John, he has sent me to condemn Satan and glorify the Messiah.

Then again, who knows, maybe he just got all of the crazy out of his system back then.

[OafOfOffice]

Not only was it on ARDC, but when found out, they had someone erase it, only dates are on the original page and a new webpage was placed stating Michelle voluntarily gave up her license.

devvy tried to get the information on why she was suspended and it was sealed. A lawyer told her it had to be bad.

It was around the time Michelle and Obama started public allies with the Clintons. The indoctrination “ism” program. Communism, racism, socialism.

[OafOfOffice]

that is the not the original page. It was changed to that one when it was found out and people started asking questions. The original only has Michelles dates left on it.

[LorenC]

Rule 770 deals with NOTHING BUT DISCIPLINE

Just read the Rule itself. At the bottom, it explicitly states:

"Effective April 1, 2004, former Rule 771 ("Types of Discipline") was renumbered as Rule 770 and a new Rule 771 ("Finality of Orders and Effective Date of Discipline") was adopted."

So today's Rule 770 was NOT the same Rule 770 when Michelle Obama stopped practicing law in 1993. The Rule 770 that was in effect when Michelle gave up her license "had provided for a court-ordered inactive status that did not require annual registration or payment of any fee," and THAT Rule was done away with in 2000.

[LorenC]

The Yahoo answers source is inaccurate. If you go to the The Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission page, Michelle Obama is listed as

"Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law - Last Registered Year: 1993"

Not only is the Yahoo answer bad (especially because it doesn't actually link to a source, or provide an image to back up its claim), but the Yahoo respondent's phrasing isn't what the ARDC actually uses for disbarred attorneys. Instead, the ARDC entry says this:

[Brown Deer]

"on court ordered inactive status"

So, some more records changed again. Ever-changing newspaper articles, court records, selective service records, social security records, school records, names, birth certificates, passports...

[bigoil]

I would suggest you Google Judge Carter.

He works at night.

He works on the weekends.

He is a MARINE who received a bronze star and a purple heart after being wounded at Khe Sanh. (that’s in Vietnam)

He even said in the October 5th transcript (oh that’s right you can’t read) that ‘we can stay here all night until you walk me through the impeachment process’. He directed this question to Roger West.

Maybe there are crooked slackers in Chicago (see Sherman Skolnick)on the bench (gosh pa, do you think they might be dishonest?) but I wouldn’t characterize Judge Carter as being anything less than unimpeachable in terms of either work habits or stamina.

Also, the BIG OC has just finished with the tear down of ‘America’s Sheriff’, Mike Carona who is now a convicted FELON and has been sentenced to 5 and a half years in the Federal pokey. His two assistant Sheriff’s Don Haidl and
George Jaramillo are also convicted FELONS.

If the true ‘powers that be’ of the conservative Republican stronghold of Orange County, California can overcome the massive resistance proferred by the OC GOP and the Lincoln Club in defense of Sheriff Carona, then what makes you think that Obama can somehow avoid similiar scrutiny?

I’ll give you one clue though just because I like you; the true ‘powers that be’ of the Big OC are DEMOCRATS.

And the biggest OC democrat of them all is about to get DIRECTLY involved in Barnett vs. Obama.

How do I know this?

Because he owes me a favor and I’m calling in my marker.

And he’s a YALE educated lawyer.

Stick that up your HARVARD YARD BARRY!!!

[Brown Deer]

especially because it doesn't actually link to a source

Where's your source? All I see is a doctored screen print.

[Pilsner]

Court pleadings are often full of mistakes and there is a very good reason why. It is understood that no one really reads them.

Oh really? (Orly?) You mean I've wasted all the hours I've spent drafting pleadings, because they were never read? If I had known that, I could have posted a million comments by now!

/sarcasm

Everyone knows that the only thing that matters is face time with the judge. That is the only place anything will happen.

You know, I have been to a Court or two in deep South Texas, on the defense side, where Court starts 15 minutes late, when the Plaintiff's lawyer, and the judge, walk out of the Judge's chambers together, laughing uproariously. In those cases, when the trial judge might not read the pleadings, and you can't do much more than protect the record for the appeal, pleadings are even more important, because they will certainly be read in the Court of Appeals.

[Brown Deer]

He is a MARINE

I used to watch him every week. ;-)



Because he owes me a favor and I’m calling in my marker.

That sounds like a contradiction of the honorable man you just described.