Check out #40, too.
.
Posted on 10/16/2009 11:04:20 AM PDT by pissant
Eight all at once and one separately. He’s not giving out details at this time, but says he has lawyers working on the briefs. Kreep has become much more outspoken about Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., even while not mentioning her name. He trashed the main complaint she wrote for their case Barnett v. Obama to hell, calling it “terrible,” at the mildest.
Andrea Shea King blog talk radio.
(Excerpt) Read more at ohforgoodnesssake.com ...
The U.S. Attorney’s Office are handling these.”
Isn’t this a misuse of the U S Government?
NObama is the one on the hot seat for this lawsuit...and not as for something he did as President.
He is on the hot seat for what he did as a private citizen- which was to hide his birth certificate.
I don’t believe that any government funds or personnel should be used to defend NObama.
The Dems will be slaughtered in the upcoming elections when Obama is found to be ineligible. The fall out will be long and large with many consequences detrimental to the Donkey party.
Discovery is this or any case is not part of national policy, but instead a decision made judges in each case.
However, instituting Tort Reform that would enact a system of "Loser Pays" is something that can be passed on the state and national level via legislation.
Sue the President and you sue the United States. U.S. Attorney handles those.
Check out #40, too.
.
He wasn't sued until after the inauguration.
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
Actually, that's not true.
Again, if Obama is proven to be ineligible for the presidency, he should have to pay the legal expenses of the victorious plaintiff and the government.
And those who file unsuccessful lawsuits against Obama should have to pay the legal expenses of Obama and the government.
truman, you and I both know you post on every single one of these threads basically stating you can’t stand the notion that we want obama to PROVE he’s eligible. This loser pays theorem is just one of many of your arguments against our cause.
I just find it so peculiar that you and about 5 others are relentless with your defense of obama and it doesn’t make an ounce of sense.
Unless you support him and you’re trolling a conservative site.
True, there were several suits filed against Obama prior to inauguration and private attorneys handled those. But the active cases that are pefore judges currently were filed after the inauguration. The U.S. Attorney handles those, and will handle the ones that Kreep is filing.
How is it that you can be a conservative, while being against “Loser Pays?”
And I never said that I was opposed to a law that would require Obama or any other presidential candidate to prove his or her eligibility.
In fact, on other threads I voiced support for such a law.
Gary Kreep has one of the cases that was filed before the inauguration. It is still in the appeals process.
Again, your post was wrong.
Which case would that be?
CARTER then discussed the two-party system and viability of third-party candidates, and expressed that he thinks having the ability for third-party candidates is important, and then he said he still wants to know why no one has raised this issue.”
BP2:
As I posted earlier, I believe Judge Land signaled agreement with Carter's comment when he wrote in his sanctions motion in the part following “unless” which I think applies to political candidates cheated out of fair election:
“But it is clear that the Constitution does not contemplate that the judiciary will participate in the selection or removal of the President, unless an individual can clearly demonstrate that his individual constitutional rights are somehow violated by the process.”
Yes, conservatives lost and you guys are making us pay.
Keyes vs Bowen et al.
Which one — the one Obama flubbed on Jan 20th or ...
|
There IS a law, it’s called The Constitution.
And I never said I was against loser pays, it should be mandated. I’m saying you’re using that as one of a myriad of reasons NOT to pursue this against obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
