Posted on 10/16/2009 7:27:04 AM PDT by little sis
At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.
I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it.
(Excerpt) Read more at fightinwordsusa.wordpress.com ...
He's an impotent wusp. This is why he is always apologizing. He wants a one world government. He wants the U.S. to be a bit player in an International Court. He has already trashed our Constitution. In fact, he wasn't the first. Obama is finishing the job. I state this with anger ad sadness. I love my country and HATE, absolutely HATE seeing him destroy it and make us into a third world country.
Enemies within.
He can sign it. The Senate has to ratify it and they aren’t going to do so.
Zero isn’t King yet.
Last time they tried this, it got 0 votes in the US Senate. Just cause he signs it doesn’t make it law.
It would be treason. Impeach.
Clinton signed all sorts of things but they had no force of law.
Yep ... those treaty things are much tougher to get around ... 66 votes to ratify.
Carter and Clinton did stupid stuff like this. Heck Clinton even signed onto the Kyoto protocols.
In the USA, the sovereigns are the citizens. They cannot be sold out by the government. We do not have rulers, we have representatives. O-dumb-boy doesn’t get the difference.
Oh no, they didn’t!
Lock and load. Lock and load.
How many votes does it take to ratify a treaty? If it takes only 51, then this is a done deal.
this has nothing to do with real science....’climate change’ is a vehicle for globalist one world government
Says who? They have 60 62 at least 64 Dhimmi votes that would love to vote for such a measure.
Traitors all.
“Yep ... those treaty things are much tougher to get around ... 66 votes to ratify.”
It could be a headfake anyway. He knows it won’t pass but the dems sign the useless silly thing and then get to pass the blame onto the GOP.
Looks bad for the GOP to the Euroevironazis but good to the average US citizen.
It’s a no-win for the dems either way. It just makes their loopy commie arm happy.
“The Senate has to ratify it and they aren’t going to do so.”
They rejected Kyoto because it would cost them. They may go along with this, though, because to be left out of the world governance would be unthinkable.
If this actually sets up a world government (and it de facto does) then some would desperately want to be at the reins, rather than in the traces.
Difference is Obama will send them the money. Spreading the wealth is a good thing. And remember Kissinger already said Obama is being groomed to be installed as World Leader.
Barry will be a gelding after 2010.
As far as I know the Constitution is the Supreme Law of Land and even treaties cannot trump it’s provisions.
The preamble even state the Constitution is made for the people.
HOLY-MOLY AMEN TO THIS GUY!
You may be surprised to learn that there is plenty of precedent that treaties do indeed trump the Constitution as formal obligations of the Nation. I think that is crap, but still, it is out there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.