Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE US HAS "MORE THAN ALL THE MIDDLE EAST PUT TOGETHER" ( oil )
Atlas Shrugs ^ | October 10th | Pamela Geller

Posted on 10/11/2009 5:18:39 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing

The government is, increasingly, the enemy. Imagine the jobs, the wealth, the independence, and cutting the jihad snake off at the head. There is no downside. We could easily extract that oil with minimum impact to the trees.

.....

For decades, Democrats have blocked efforts to responsibly develop this nation's energy resources, transforming vast areas of opportunity into "The No Zone." (hat tip Jim)


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bakken; bhoenergy; drillbabydrill; drillheredrillnow; drilling; energy; energyindependence; gasprices; middleeast; nozone; oil; oildrilling; thenozone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
This map of the no zone is fantastic.


1 posted on 10/11/2009 5:18:39 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Damn straight, we have more oil than OPEC!

Tangent: Now, is there some correlation between these oozy globs they’ve been seeing in the ocean and the untapped oil? I kind of wonder. If we drilled, might they cease? Hmmm? Me wonders....


2 posted on 10/11/2009 5:36:11 PM PDT by swatbuznik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik

UCSB noticed that too.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2271454/posts


3 posted on 10/11/2009 5:40:08 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing ( The War on toilet paper : What if an environmentalist mistakenly used poison ivy ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
We have oil.
We have natural gas.
We have coal.
We have uranium.

The Democrats don't want us to use it.

4 posted on 10/11/2009 5:40:14 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Bookmarked for later info access,good find.


5 posted on 10/11/2009 5:40:49 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

bump for later read


6 posted on 10/11/2009 5:43:59 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I've been saying this for a while now. If we want to remain an economic powerhouse we have to develop our oil fields right now.
7 posted on 10/11/2009 5:48:18 PM PDT by peeps36 (Democrats Don't Need No Stinking Input From You Little People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Beyond

Just goes to show us, each 2 and 4 years we reelect the same people who’ve been on the arab payroll for years. SO what are we going to do about it? Wait till the arabs run out of oil? Now we’re paying brazil to drill off shore. So when are we going to take care of our own?


8 posted on 10/11/2009 5:49:37 PM PDT by tillacum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
"For decades, Democrats have blocked efforts to responsibly develop this nation's energy resources,..."

BS. I've watched more Republicans than Democrats ban mining of uranium and drilling for oil in the West.

It's a shame that the only organization in Colorado in favor of uranium mining and oil drilling (Action 22) is mostly comprised of Democrats in Denver and Pueblo. The bipartisan rich on the Range are working as hard as they can against harvesting energy. They even outlaw private wind turbines in windy areas (building height limits, etc.).

Both parties lean to the left in their big-business-government partnerships and social perversions (feminism, etc.). Neither will get votes from me.


9 posted on 10/11/2009 5:52:42 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

When you look at the percentage of oil imported into the U.S. and realize Canada is the #1 imported and Mexico #2, you have to wonder why we even need to import any longer. FREE THE OIL!!!!


10 posted on 10/11/2009 5:57:35 PM PDT by IrishPennant (Then join hand in hand, brave Americans all! By uniting we stand, by dividing we fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishPennant

oops...#1 imported = #1 importer...


11 posted on 10/11/2009 5:58:38 PM PDT by IrishPennant (Then join hand in hand, brave Americans all! By uniting we stand, by dividing we fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tillacum
"Now we’re paying brazil to drill off shore."

Brazil makes much of its fuel from sugar cane. Oil stories from Brazilian politicians have been getting wilder by the year. The large oil reservoirs said to be off the coast there will not be harvested in the foreseeable future (too far, too deep, salt domes, etc.).

The stories come from importers who fear higher freight fuel prices and other interests. ...much like the advertisements about trips to Venus in "The Marching Morons" (short story by C. M. Kornbluth). The joke's supposed to be on the rest of us, but the consequences will also fall on the morons who devised the Brazilian oil canards.

Meanwhile, Brazil and China are trading in their own currencies and trying to depose the dollar internationally.


12 posted on 10/11/2009 6:18:03 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Great news. Put a lot of people to work.

parsy


13 posted on 10/11/2009 6:33:14 PM PDT by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
... we now have access of up to 500 billion barrels. And because this is light, sweet oil, those billions of barrels will cost Americans just $16 PER BARREL! That's enough crude to fully fuel the American economy for 2041 years straight.

Fact check: at 20M bbl/day, 500B bbl lasts about 70 years -- not too shabby, but not 2041 years. 2T bbl (mentioned later in the article) lasts about 270 years. Still, this gives us plenty of transition time.

14 posted on 10/11/2009 6:51:10 PM PDT by AZLiberty (Yes, Mr. Lennon, I do want a revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
The Liberal's worst nightmare is that we can become independent from foreign oil.

"I no longer care much about the science of global warming. To me, the central question, and the one that few are willing to discuss in depth, is: Then what? Fossil fuels now provide about 85% of the world's total energy needs. Even more important is this corollary: Increasing energy consumption equals higher living standards. Always. Everywhere. Given that fact, how can we expect the people of the world -- all 6.6 billion of them -- to use less energy? The short answer: we can't. The developed countries of the world can talk forever about the virtues of solar panels and windmills, but what the energy-poor need most are common fuels like kerosene, propane, and gasoline"
--Robert Bryce, Gusher of Lies: The Dangerous Delusions of 'Energy Independence

15 posted on 10/11/2009 8:16:42 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (No to Crap -n- Trade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing; bruinbirdman

Also this today:

Energy crisis is postponed as new gas rescues the world
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2360352/posts

“There has been a revolution in the gas fields of North America. Reserve estimates are rising sharply as technology unlocks unconventional resources,” he said.

This is almost unknown to the public...Rune Bjornson from Norway’s StatoilHydro said exploitable reserves are much greater than supposed just three years ago and may meet global gas needs for generations.

The US is leading the charge. Operations in Pennsylvania and Texas have already been sufficient to cut US imports of liquefied natural gas (LGN) from Trinidad


16 posted on 10/11/2009 8:24:02 PM PDT by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik

“I kind of wonder. If we drilled, might they cease? Hmmm? Me wonders....”

When I was a kid you couldn’t go to any beach in So. California without getting covered with tar.

The only reason that it isn’t there today is the oil wells in the Santa Barbara Channel, the Long Beach oil island and the oil platfoem at Seal Beach.

Even up into the 50s there was an oil slick from the horseshoe kelp to the mexican border.

There is still oil boiling up but not in the thousnads of barrels per day that it used to since the gas pressure has been reduced by the current wells..


17 posted on 10/11/2009 8:36:13 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

Most of California’s natural oil and gas seeps are in the area circled in white on this shaded relief map. The state’s major underground oil and gas fields (known from drilled wells) are in the three areas outlined in yellow. Note that the seeps occur near the oil and gas oil fields. This is no coincidence.

The reason seeps are found close to major oil and gas fields is that most seeps are fed by these natural underground reservoirs. Just as springs are fed by underground reservoirs of water, oil and gas seeps are fed by underground reservoirs of oil and gas.

Shaded Relief Map

http://geomaps.wr.usgs.gov/seeps/where.html


18 posted on 10/11/2009 9:32:17 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Waste and fraud are synonymous with gov't spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

For over 40 years I did work on every refinery, corporate office, distribution facility and gas station built in So. California.

I have a pretty good knowledge of where all the oil and gas in California is and how much they have since we were in constant contact with the heads of all the oil companies.

Most of the fields were shut down when Carter put in his 10% “excess profits tax” which was a well head tax and had nothing to do with profit.

At that time the total tax bite in California from well to station pump was 86% and made it unprofitable to use up their reserves when they could buy foreign oil and put the tax on their oil.

As one VP said to me, some dau they will reduce the tax on oil and it will be worth something, probably not in my lifetime but it’s not going anywhere and maybe my grand kids or their kids can profit from it.

When that tax went in Joe Shell, the president of the Independant Oil Producers of California, had 3 wildcat wells under way and the Bank of America called him and pulled his financing with the statment “those wells will never make a profit until they remove that tax”.


19 posted on 10/11/2009 10:29:55 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tillacum
---------Now we're paying brazil to drill off shore.------------

We're paying Soros to drill off the brazilian shore line. :-)

20 posted on 10/12/2009 1:32:05 AM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing ( The War on toilet paper : What if an environmentalist mistakenly used poison ivy ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson