Posted on 10/11/2009 1:32:18 PM PDT by Elderberry
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 10/11/2009 at 12:57 PM PDT and filed on 10/11/2009
Come now the Plaintiffs with this Request for Judicial Notice that Individual Damages are not required in public sector mail & wire fraud relating to political corruption under 18 U.S.C. §1346, together with notice of filing expanded report by Susan Daniels.
During this Court’s hearing on October 5, 2009, the Court searchingly examined counsel for the Plaintiffs and Defendants regarding the sole threshold question of “standing.” Plaintiffs’ provided arguments of Flast v. Cohen taxpayer standing or else 9th Amendment reserved rights to Petition for Redress of Grievances concerning a clear violation of the Constitution’s clearly demarcated qualifications for the Presidency, as well as Oath taker standing per Allen v Board of Education and USA v Clark . l
Plaintiffs have, in the course of their investigations during the past year, accumulated a substantial amount of evidence concerning the Mr. Obama’s fraudulent manipulation of his own identity, and the legal identity of others. To this end Plaintiffs have previously submitted the Affidavit and Independent Investigative Report of Former Scotland Yard Inspector Neal Sankey and now submit the expanded Report of Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels.
These two private investigation reports, although slightly duplicative, show beyond reasonable doubt a pattern of manipulation of Barack Hussein Obama’s identity, employment, and residence information. The use of a multitude of social security numbers alone is indicative that Mr. Obama appears to have committed a substantial number of felony violations, including but not limited to violations of 42 U.S.C. §408(a)(7)(B). which shows dishonest political advantage during 2008 election.
Plaintiffs submit again that “the American People Reserve the Right to know”. Furthermore, the examination and decipherment of the trail of deception so casually left by this successful candidate will (1) lead ultimately to discovery of the truth about his origins and citizenship, (2) reveal the nature of the scheme to defraud by which this Mr. Barack Hussein Obama became President, and (3) show the degree and nature of the collusion of other people and parties in the scheme of defraud leading to his election, including but not limited to the other Defendants.
The Plaintiffs have repeatedly alleged that the election of 2008 was procured by fraud. Acquisition of high public office by and through implementation of a scheme to defraud regarding material facts regarding a candidate’s qualifications and identity is a species of public sector fraud. Such a scheme to defraud is actionable by private parties under 18 U.S.C. §1346, in that each instance of the use of interstate wires or mail delivery facilities counts as an individual predicate act under Civil R.I.C.O., 18 U.S.C. §§1961, 1962(a)-(d), and 1964(c).
Plaintiffs request the Court to take note that the United States Congress’ express purpose in enacting 18 U.S.C. §1346 was to ensure that corruption by both (even paired) public and private sector defendants (such as Defendants Barack and Michelle Obama were from the Illinois Senatorial Election 2004-up-through January 20, 2009 individualized damages were not required to obtain convictions under 18 U.S.C. §1346.
It logically follows that Civil RICO actions relating to public and private sector corruption which would utilize predicate acts of criminal violations of 18 U.S.C. §1346 could likewise be brought without proof of individualized damages or “standing” in the civil sense.
Plaintiffs accordingly submit that the principles of prosecutions of public corruption based on 18 U.S.C. §1346 be applied to evaluate the standing of the Plaintiffs in the present above-entitled-and-numbered case Barnett v. Obama.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that this Honorable Court take Judicial Notice of the doctrine of the people’s intangible right to honest services based on 18 U.S.C. §1346, and consider the significance for the standing of the people to bring suit under Civil RICO (18 U.S.C. §1964(c)), that the criminal predicate acts for RICO which may be substantiated under this title do not require specific personalized injury to business or property interests.
Accordingly, the people of the United States may sue for Civil RICO for the fraudulent denial of their intangible right to honest services without showing individualized specific injury, and this case should be allowed to go forward, albeit with Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint allowed to be filed, and considered as a fundamental (complementary) element of citizen standing. Respectfully submitted, Sunday, October 11, 2009
Some are; others aren't. I think reasonable people could conclude that a person spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to continue to fight the release of a simple document has something they are trying to hide.
Don't you find it curious that there are virtually no records of his past?
Look carefully at this statement:
Conservatives are on a roll because leftists are incompetent and their ideology is fraudulent.
Nothing about birthers or Taitz, because I’m not claiming anything about them in reference to conservatism as you wrongly state.
It’s not directly a birth certificate-related comment, but a comment on the larger circumstances. Conservatives are on a roll. Leftists are incompetent. Their ideology is fraudulent.
And trolls can’t do anything about it.
Apparently “simple, obvious truths” and “simple Consitutional truths” are now trumped by lawyerly legalism and precedents which are based on conniving legalisms.
It’s Alice through the looking glass time. Truth? Facts? Honesty? Means nothing now.
I was keeping up with this thread pretty well but apparently missed a couple of pulled posts. But I never read any attacks on anyone’s soul or spiritual beliefs or position.
I did hear a screech that seemed theatrically fake, though.
None of the 0bama suckups ever, every address or respond to any rational inquiries such as “don’t you wonder why all his records are sealed, scrubbed, hidden, etc”. Ever.
Odd. All they do is attack people who question 0bama’s eligibility. That’s all.
The judge had enough:
When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice.-snip-
Regrettably, the conduct of counsel Orly Taitz has crossed these lines, and Ms. Taitz must be sanctioned for her misconduct. After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsel’s conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsel’s response to the Court’s show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court.
With respect and humility. In my mind I’m defending this website from the same enemy which is killing our liberty, like a cancer, on a national scale.
But if my comments were truly beneath the standards of FreeRepublic, I apologize and will do better.
You’re right—it was a screech, and it was theatrical and fake.
Sometimes I wonder if it will dawn on them to sit down and consider how it’s worth it to advance an ideology that is only viable when disguised as something else.
People “see” in accordance with their desires, which mask and cloudy up their vision of reality - of objective truth, which exists whether someone “sees” it or believes in it or not.
The only safe, sane and happy way to live is to desire Truth above all else, and to be willing to give up fondly held beliefs and opinions in service to Truth.
Otherwise, most people twist and abbreviate or outright invert Truth to fit into their preconceived notions, and even more so, desires. Many peoples’ capacity for Truth is very small, since their holding tank (their heart, really) is so filled with “I want this” “I believe this” “this stuff I hate”, “I’ve always been this kind of person” and so on.
I follow these threads carefully and this one as well, and I never read reasonandfaith attack the one who complained’s spiritual status.
I'm discovering questions that Afterbirthers are incapable of answering.
Nor have I --
I read the info here and it would seem IF the poster had the credentials he claimed, it would be sufficient to say the COLB was a fraud..
I am propsoing that the president be compelled to prove he is qualified in accoprdance with the constitution, the burden is on him since he has not done so already. Had he done so, then I would think that any voter who could PRESENT evidence to the contrary, would have standing and could compell discovery.
Good description.
Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.