That’s bull. A marriage that was void at inception is not considered a legal marriage just because you got a marriage license. Good god, read some immigration case law.
Not until it is proven void.
So until someone proves that the marriage between Stanly and Barack I was void, they will remain married on in the eyes of the law.
And no, heresay and rumors about Barrack I's bigamy is not sufficient evidence to prove it.
Prove to me that Obama Sr. had a valid marriage prior if you can.. Then prove to me why the marriage makes any differance at all ,, Obama Sr. claimed Obama II/jr. as his child and gave him his name WHILE IN A MARRIAGE TO THE MOTHER.. US law says he is Obama Sr.'s child no matter what the other circumstances might be. Your building arguments based upon assumptions and presumptions, especially the void at inception bit, NOBODY HAS LEGALLY CHALLENGED THE VALIDITY OF THE MARRIAGE. Do you really think challenging it retroactively is a winning gambit for Dear Leader? The old ... let me fix my paperwork and stall for the next 3 years routine works for you??
LOL
Get em Chick!