Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Imprison People for No Insurance?
Town Hall ^ | 9/26/09 | reasonmclucus

Posted on 09/26/2009 3:39:18 PM PDT by kathsua

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Isn't that just like Liberals. Throwing people in jail for not doing what they want.
1 posted on 09/26/2009 3:39:19 PM PDT by kathsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kathsua
The one time they will ignore Roe vs. Wade.
2 posted on 09/26/2009 3:42:11 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

I think that people should be imprisoned for failure to obey the Dear Leader, or for publicly disagreeing with the Chosen One. Such things should not be tolerated.

Heil Obama!


3 posted on 09/26/2009 3:42:21 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

What about the Amish, Old Order Mennonites and others who insure through their churches? Will whole churches, whole comunities be imprisoned?


4 posted on 09/26/2009 3:42:41 PM PDT by Cloverfarm (Where are we going, and why are we in a hand-basket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

We need to look at setting up extremely limited computer access Freeper chapters in prisons for those of us who are going for ignoring these communists.


5 posted on 09/26/2009 3:46:19 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

Come and get me, coppers!

Civil disobedience is good now and then. Properly orchestrated it can move mountains.
What will they do when thousands blow them off? Or more?
We have a few years to figure this out and make plans with our loved ones before the hammer falls.

Would I go to the joint for liberty? You bet yer a$$!


6 posted on 09/26/2009 3:50:54 PM PDT by ozark hilljilly (Ignore us at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

Aw heck, throw me in jail. I need a vacation.


7 posted on 09/26/2009 4:01:09 PM PDT by donhunt ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donhunt

TOP OF THE WORLD, MA!


8 posted on 09/26/2009 4:06:09 PM PDT by Mister Muggles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ozark hilljilly

This requirement is clearly unconstitutional based upon Article I, Section 9 - “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.”


9 posted on 09/26/2009 4:07:35 PM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: donhunt

It won’t be a jail...it will be a CAMP, where you may “work” to satisfy your debt to the collective.


10 posted on 09/26/2009 4:07:38 PM PDT by Mister Muggles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

We know...except that with this prez and this congress, if I may paraphrase: “We don’t need no steekin’ Constitution!!”


11 posted on 09/26/2009 4:10:21 PM PDT by ozark hilljilly (Ignore us at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

Well of course everyone will be thrown in jail except the illegal aliens.


12 posted on 09/26/2009 4:11:23 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Muggles

Right it would have to be camps not jails. The camp for bad girls and boys.


13 posted on 09/26/2009 4:11:58 PM PDT by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

They don’t need jail to get people to comply. Making it financially difficult for non-compliance will do the job.


14 posted on 09/26/2009 4:16:20 PM PDT by cydcharisse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

I hear that you get free health coverage in prison ...


15 posted on 09/26/2009 4:16:46 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Muggles

They’re just going to use it to confiscate your property. Instead of jailing you, they will impose a fine, and if you refuse to pay then they dock your pay, and if you don’t have a wage job they can parasitize, they will put a lien on your property, and if you don’t pay they will sell your property at auction to their cronies. They’re after the money. If they resort to jailing people, it will only be after ripping you off first. And then only a few people, separated far from eachother, may be jailed to gin up more fear so people submit quietly to the theft. I don’t expect them to try mass jailings because that would inspire people to organize against the communists.


16 posted on 09/26/2009 4:17:58 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: piasa

That’s why we need to stick together now. Otherwise they will pass this scheme and devour everything one bite at a time.


17 posted on 09/26/2009 4:20:03 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ozark hilljilly

I think any fines will be payable to the IRS. That way any noncompliance is treated as tax evasion and the noncomplier gets the full force of the IRS against him.


18 posted on 09/26/2009 4:32:36 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames
Isn't a bill of attainder only relevant to a specific person? For example, a bill against Oprah Winfrey alone is illegal, but a law against all bank executives theoretically isn't. ObamaCare Jokes Obama Jokes
19 posted on 09/26/2009 4:32:39 PM PDT by tbw2 (Freeper sci-fi - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mister Muggles


Hot Heat*(1949)





*This movie title has been edited for your thought-security. Dept. of Homeland Security, 2012
20 posted on 09/26/2009 4:34:06 PM PDT by Since 2009-07-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson