Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void

The claim is Maui.


132 posted on 09/21/2009 8:03:50 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

Thanks.


137 posted on 09/21/2009 8:06:09 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 243 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
The claim is Maui

But no records or newspaper listings to indicate that. The record would not be accessible, same as the BC/CoLB, but in those days, marriage licenses were published, and they still are if permission is given, and the local paper wishes to do so, some do, some don't.

The license might not be one issued in Maui either. I happened to have looked, just Monday, at the Texas requirements. (A coworker's brother is getting married and wants the service to be near family, even though he lives in Nevada, and his bride is a Filipina. If you get a license in Texas, you can be married anywhere, not just Texas. You certainly don't have to be married in the same county. So a license could be issued in Dallas, but the Wedding take place in San Antonio, or Cancun.

A quick look at the Hawaii requirement (in 2009 not 1961!) doesn't reveal if the wedding must take place in the same "county". However the form has you select which island you plan to be married on, and who will perform the service. (Such persons must be licensed by the state.

186 posted on 09/21/2009 10:25:49 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson