But no records or newspaper listings to indicate that. The record would not be accessible, same as the BC/CoLB, but in those days, marriage licenses were published, and they still are if permission is given, and the local paper wishes to do so, some do, some don't.
The license might not be one issued in Maui either. I happened to have looked, just Monday, at the Texas requirements. (A coworker's brother is getting married and wants the service to be near family, even though he lives in Nevada, and his bride is a Filipina. If you get a license in Texas, you can be married anywhere, not just Texas. You certainly don't have to be married in the same county. So a license could be issued in Dallas, but the Wedding take place in San Antonio, or Cancun.
A quick look at the Hawaii requirement (in 2009 not 1961!) doesn't reveal if the wedding must take place in the same "county". However the form has you select which island you plan to be married on, and who will perform the service. (Such persons must be licensed by the state.
I don’t think there was a marriage in Hawaii and Obama is covering his butt with the claim of...I was too scared to find out the truth...
If you start with the idea of no marriage in Hawaii then you look to why there was a divorce. She either got married somewhere else - like Kenya - or she lied for some reason .
If you accept the possibility that her family was working with the spooks - be it Russia, US or another country.. it could be they are the ones that told her to do it because she had been telling everyone there was a marriage.
What we do know is his family history is a bunch of lies and coverups.
The reason for the claim of Maui could be she didn’t want a record that she had been to Kenya.