Posted on 09/11/2009 7:29:33 PM PDT by STARWISE
These brave troops have to endure have Obama as CIC.
But Americans do not want their boys dying because of Obama’s cowardice and stupidity.
Stop the stupidity, Obama - stop the Outrage - allow our troops to protect themselves and to take the fight to the enemy!
I’m hoping more people will read Luttrell’s book, “The Lone Survivor”. It is without a doubt a book that every patriotic American should read. Then we need to kick the s.o.b.’s in Washington out of office and elect people who really do love our country like Luttrell does.
BO is no president and certainly no CIC. He is nothing but a wimpy celebrity that should be judging American Idol or hosting Talk Soup. He’s not a man and celebrities don’t have to be men, they just have to look good and act cool.
You are right - of course - he is an imposter in the first place and a communist racist demagogue in the second place - but officially he is CIC.....so very sadly for our heroes in the military.
(( ping ))
The zero has no problem killing Americans.
In before SoCalPol.
Obama’s warped ideology will continue to do great harm to our troops and our country.
He wants America weak and in retreat, everything he’s done makes that glaringly obvious.
Pray for our brave.
August was the deadliest month of the war! thanks to obam a'a new ROE. Sept. is looking even worse.
Where now is the press outrage?
It seems he's more concerned about taliban lives than American.
We need to get this featured on FOX - NOW.
Email each separately - they don't open mass mailings - or you can email 'separately' by using the BCC line - that way, each one only sees their email address/name.
Read this story of the battle - include the link in the emails - we must fight for our troops - the administration wont.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/75036.html
glennbeck@foxnews.com; rush@eibnet.com; hannity@foxnews.com; huckaby@foxnews.com
Live links next post.
Help our troops!
Read this story of the battle - email the link to beck, et al -
we must fight for our troops...obama wont.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/75036.html
email - use the BCC line for add’l email adds as they won’t open ‘mass mailings’ - and include your name/town and email add...or they won’t get read.
glennbeck@foxnews.com ; hannity@foxnews.com ; oreilly@foxnews.com ; rush@eibnet.com ;
"Either you are with us or you are for the terrorists."
~~George W. Bush
It demonstrates my Unified Theory of Obama: Any action he takes or policy he proposes is designed with the sole purpose of the destruction of this nation.
It is a plan. It is done with malicious intent. It is not incompetence; if it were, very occasionally there would be something done that we agreed with.
If one is trying to predict his position on any issue, just think what the worst way of dealing with it would be (as regards our nation's interest) and THAT will be the position he chooses.
I believe he is setting the military up so that they can be blamed when he pulls out of Afghanistan. It won't be HIS fault. Nope, it will be that the military couldn't do the job (no doubt because George Bush wore them out) and he will blame the loss of Afghanistan on them and Bush.
His overriding goal is to reduce the respect and influence the military has in America. They will be marginalized and honest to God, I wouldn't be surprised if he tries to disarm them.
BTTT
BTTT
If our terrible jobs situation was different, I’m sure that recruiting and retention would be WAY down, thus speeding up the Left’s desired disintegration of our Military. After all, it isn’t Faaiiir for America to have such a strong defense force!
The deaths of these four American troops has hardly caused a ripple in the 0bamamedia. Just disgusting.
Boats, you were saying something about building a new wing at Leavenworth. Obama is turning the whole country into that wing.
A nation must reject any war against a determined enemy fought with such rules of engagement. They are a certain death sentence for many of our troops.
In the early years of the Iraq war, I know of soldiers who had exactly the enemy among civilians scenario come up. They hated it, but they knew their duty. To their credit they tried to AVOID civilian casualties.
That would be a far better ROE, what the soldiers on the battlefield figured out. You don’t give the enemy free shots. You engage him when he engages you. If they are among civilians, you honestly try to avoid civilian casualties, something that isn’t always possible.
And, as at Haditha, there are often times when the civilians are themselves somewhat complicit. Remember the 13 year old who explained how they knew that the IED was going off?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.