The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie

RightSideNews.com ^ | September 10, 2009 | JB Williams

[khnyny]

Though we live in an era when all undesirable facts are often blindly labeled "conspiracy theories" by political operatives with an agenda at risk, a very real conspiracy unfolds every now and then.

While it is indeed true that not all theories are actual conspiracies, like when Hillary Clinton developed an imaginary "right-wing conspiracy" out to get her husband, when in fact, the semen stained dress provided all the necessary (but unfriendly) facts and a perfectly logical explanation for all of those nasty rumors - it is also true that some conspiracies are much more than just crackpot theory.

To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire, plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, is a "conspiracy." Not in theory, but in reality.

Such is the case today!

A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many - many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens.

They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a blind quest for unbridled political power, and they hoped that you would never catch it. They almost got away with it too...

They snuck it past fifty state election commissions, congress, the US Supreme Court and Justice Department, the Federal Elections Commission and countless members of the Electoral College nationwide. Not a single member of the, as Limbaugh says, "drive-by media" caught it either, or if they did, they decided to become complicit for their own political reasons.

[sissyjane]

Bookmark

[DavidFarrar]

I just hope JB Williams had the foresight to get a “certified” copy of Obama’s DNC’s Official Certification of Nomination from the SC Election Comm. If not, he had better race down where with a notary and get it certified before Obama’s people get to it, if they haven’t already.

ex animo
davidfarrar

[Freddd]

Anyone send this to Glenn?

[eggman]

Don't feel so bad. I copied it into MS Word and it didn't find it either. It returns "The spelling and grammar check is complete." message box with no problems found. Then I read it one more time and it jumped right off the page at me.

The typo was a mistake but omitting the legally qualified clause was no mistake. It was deliberate.

[OneWingedShark]

I didn’t... should I?

[DavidFarrar]

I sure hope Shalifa A. Williamson is checking her ignition every time she turns her car on from now on.

ex animo
davidfarrar

[Proud2BeRight]

Wonder what the wording was on the Clinton, Kerry, and Gore nominations? Anyone have access to those?

[DavidFarrar]

I have tried to pull them up too, but failed. I have also been trying to find out where it is the legal responsibility of the political parties to certifiy their nominees have met “their” legal requirments? That seems pretty strange to me.

ex animo
davidfarrar

[Faith]

You should get credit for this discovery, STARWISE! God bless you for all you do.

[Liberty Valance]

All ‘new’ news to me. Thanks for posting.

[The Pack Knight]

The typo was that both documents identified the party as the “Democrat Party”.

[roaddog727]

Bumperoo!

[roaddog727]

Bumperoo!

[EDINVA]

Is there FReeper who’s an FBI-trained documents expert who can examine these documents? To the naked eye, there are some, perhaps understandable, differences also in the signature blocks:

The signatures on the first shown document (with the qualified phrase in it) look different from the others, as if someone was trying to trace or replicate them. Look closely at the “N” in Nancy and the ‘e’ in Pelosi. It even seems there was a different pen used, the first shown being somewhat thicker than the second. Then, the day, “28” is written in two different styles, and the notary’s “S” in September is written differently in each document.

If these are authentic and can be proved to be authentic, the DNC and the parties involved have a serious problem on their hands.

[The Pack Knight]

I'm not clear on whether the lack of certification on the documents is supposed to be legally significant on its own, or just evidence that Obama is not qualified. There's no constitutional requirement that a President certify or prove that he's qualified for office, merely that meet the qualifications.

I know of state statutes that require candidates for most offices to make a sworn statement that they meet constitutional and statutory qualifications for office, but I haven't seen one that applies to Presidential candidates. Colorado, the state the document in the article was addressed to, has no such requirement.

If there is such a statute in a state Obama won, however, then that would mean the electors in that state were not appointed "in such manner as the Legislature" directed. If that occurred in enough states, then neither the President or Vice President were constitutionally elected. Since the Presidential term has already passed, the operation of the 20th Amendment and 3 U.S.C. § 19 would make the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, acting President. That's not an appealing prospect.

If few or no states have such a requirement, then these documents, while intriguing, are essentially irrelevant. They don't prove that Obama isn't qualified, just that the DNC failed to certify to the state boards of election that he is qualified - something it does not appear they were required to do.

Unless someone finds convincing evidence that Obama was actually not born a U.S. citizen, then this isn't going anywhere. His failure to provide a U.S. birth certificate probably won't be enough, since it looks like the burden of proof is going to be not on him, but on the party claiming he is unqualified.

[STARWISE]

Aww .. thanks ... I’m a born sleuth .. LOL.

[American Constitutionalist]

“Democrat Party” .... the party of voter fraud, corruption, lies, prostitution, sex trafficking, money scams.... did I forget to ad anything in there ?

[American Constitutionalist]

" If these are authentic and can be proved to be authentic, the DNC and the parties involved have a serious problem on their hands. "

Not Watergate,

Tsunami Gate !!

[American Constitutionalist]

" If that occurred in enough states, then neither the President or Vice President were constitutionally elected. Since the Presidential term has already passed, the operation of the 20th Amendment and 3 U.S.C. § 19 would make the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, acting President. That's not an appealing prospect. "

You forget, she IS one of the main co conspirators in this mess, and she will have her day in court and prison.

[Don Joe]

Imho, this is an important story

"An" important story?

This is THE story of the century!

This discovery has the potential to turn the country on its head -- the mind boggles.

This will either be THE biggest story since 1776 -- or, it will be VERY quickly buried in an orgasmic orwellian move the likes of which history has NEVER seen.

I don't see any other possibilities. It either sees light of day, and becomes THE turning point in this nation's history -- or, it will be airbrushed out of history with brutal efficiency, and NO mercy shown to anyone who would try to rehabilitate it.

My biggest fear is that it will be buried, effortlessly, because for MOST people, it'll be "too many words, too boring, and besides, the big game is coming on tonight" -- and for those who COULD shout it from the rooftops, it'll be an easy choice between laying it ALL on the line, or, preserving the ol' golden goose (as long as they can keep picking off two-bit hustlers at Acorn and whatnot, they will have a nice job).