Memo this to those liberal proponents that espouse that the Cali fires are due to Global Warming, kkthx.
Liberals are a danger to a free and safe society.
It seems like in the last 10 years or so just about every time there is a major forest fire somewhere a story virtually identical to this one surfaces. And nothing changes.
The fire started in a Federal area, from a lightning strike back on July 25th (yup, over a month ago). Gov't officials in Washington know how to manage land here in Utah better than we do - obviously.
We can no longer lease the wild lands to sheep herders, where the brush is grazed and kept under control - no, it's been allowed to grow as fuel for the fire.
Now, over a month later the fire is so wildly out of control (it's 5% contained after weeks of 700+ firemen working); homes have been lost, property has been lost.
Managed burns are conducted to eradicate the overgrowth, possibly preventing future fires. Complicating matters are what forest officials are allowed to do when fires do ignite in wilderness issues like the ones in the Pine Valley surrounding New Harmony.
Link
Much of Utah is controlled by the Federal Bureau of Land Managment. One would think that a state would have soverign control over how a bulk of the land within the state is used; this is obviously not true here.
BTTT
when there were fires near Lake Tahoe last year, those home owners who rejected the law that said they could not clear around their home and did it anyway did not lose those homes.
Liberals are idiots, where’s the news in that?
Without any evidence whatsoever, everybody assumed that the latest wildfire was the result of liberal Democrat eco-fascism.
Everybody, it turns out, was right.
Congratulations are due yet again to the liberal Democrats. Congratulations.
Bump.
On a very quick read I thought the title of post read
Feds Didn’t Clear Bush In LA Wildfire Areas Because Of Liberal Pressure.
After all he has been blamed for everything else bad that has happened in the world since 2001.
How's that air quality working out for you, Ileene? What's better - a controlled burn that slightly reduces air quality locally for a day or two, or 140,000 acres raging out of control for weeks, with devastating effects on the forest, lives lost, homes burned...and, oh, yeah, a really huge impact on air quality?
These so-called "environmentalists" must have found the curriculum for gym-teachers too hard.
Thought you all might be interested in this story...