SECOND ONE (WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION)
WHY WAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENCE REMOVED ?
Posted on 09/02/2009 8:04:37 PM PDT by Danae
Pelosi signed two Official Certifications of Nomination for Obama and Biden at the DNC Convention last August. Read the language carefully and note the difference between them:
SECOND ONE (WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION)
WHY WAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENCE REMOVED ?
Fred Nerks SAYS: "Just thinking out aloud here, see what you think":
Every copy I have seen online of an Hawaii CoLB has shown the place of birth as Oahu, County Honolulu. Isn’t that a little odd? Surely one or two should be from another island or another county?
Makes me think that ALL Certifications of Live Birth, Accepted OR Filed, bear that same information. (Until someone shows something different, anyway).
So, the original birth certificate for a child born in Hawaii shows the details relevant to the birth, and can be amended,(CHANGE OF NAME, ADOPTION ETC.,) with amendements shown only on the original.
Or, a late Certification could be applied for, (up until 1972 IIRC) whereby an out-of-state birth could be registered, and FILED. Again, this information remains on the original document...
When a ‘copy’, a Certification of Live Birth is requested, it’s by no means a ‘copy’ of the original birth certificate, it’s simply a standard form on which, as we know, the parents, the parents Race and the name of the child are shown.
Are you with me? The Place of Birth OAHU and the County HONOLULU may simply relate to the location of the OFFICE where the document was issued.
Therefor every CoLB shows the same, Place of Birth OAHU, County, HONOLULU.
AND THAT MAKES EVERYONE WHO HAS A COLB A CITIZEN OF THE US???
The next question might be, just how many people does this apply to? Thousands?
what you have printed here in the comments is an excerpt I provided on a previous thread. Here is the source:
http://www.thecommentary.net/the-occidental-obama-a-pawn-in-the-game/
What boat?
obumpa
Lookie here, someone has combined your posted document images with a comment of mine and an excerpt of an article without quoting a source and made what we in Oz would call a dog’s breakfast out of the Post.
That the guy was a Communist member and a Pedophile.
WOW ...
Are you the author of the text after the Pelosi bc’s regarding Occidental, federal funds, etc. ?
Just keep digging and posting....Someone is reading the information and it will get out sooner or later ...
Circumcism material even made it into an Alaskan source...Shows where their minds are....Mine was purely researched.;~)
That is what I was thinking!
Bloody well thought through too!
Does anyone else find it interesting that the BC case in California is scheduled for Sept. 9th and suddenly Obama is scheduling his big propaganda speech to our children for the 8th and his propaganda speech to the joint session for the 9th?
Things that make you go hmmmmm....which we are doing alot of these days.
Does anyone else find it interesting that the BC case in California is scheduled for Sept. 9th and suddenly Obama is scheduling his big propaganda speech to our children for the 8th and his propaganda speech to the joint session for the 9th?
If Judge Carter actually does end up hearing this case “on the merits,” sometime in the future, your comment would make sense. But why would Obama care about a hearing that’s primarily focused on ORLY - and whether her various actions and motions in the case have been proper/properly filed ? ? ?
Because there are already two MSM covering the hearing: CNN and FOX.
Trying to make “bigger” news to coverup the story or at least limit its exposure.
Have you read ALinsky’s Rules? If you have read a book called ELEANA, it was written by a Greek-AMerican in search of how his mother was killed by the communists when they took over Greece. It goes step by step in how it’s done. ANd it parallels what is happening in the USA now.
Trying to make “bigger” news to coverup the story or at least limit its exposure.
I haven’t yet read Alinsky’s Rules, but keep seeing it referenced, so I guess I will soon. I’ll look for ELEANA too - thanks for the recommendation - I love books!
No. Democrats are exempt from the law. Until they become expendable.
ping
“Trying to make “bigger” news to coverup the story or at least limit its exposure”
BINGO!!
“The “news” is going to be about whether or not Orly acted improperly with respect to her clients and whether Orly properly filed some papers. The “news” is not going to be about Obama.”
It doesn’t matter..any ‘news’ on the whole BC issue is ALL ABOUT OBAMA in the final analysis. Obama and his handlers are trying to deflect any attention to this hearing by trying to make bigger news on the same day and the day before.
BTW..Obama’s propaganda speech to all of the children in America is the 8th..his speech to a joint session of Congress is the 9th. and the hearing(according to this thread) is the 9th.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.