She said she opposes amnesty. She said people have to follow the law.
What's your problem?
- JP
Giving steve-b the night off?
Uh.....um...ur.....I'll stick with supporting Sarah Palin.
Mittens is getting his rear end kicked on a politico poll. So you plant a story from nearly a year ago when Sarah Palin was under the McCain campaign control. What was she supposed to do, make him look bad?
Sarah Palin has already let us know that she does not support illegals getting anything. She is squarely in the corner of legal American citizens.
Take your anti-Palin garbage somewhere else and tell your RAT friend Willard we’re on to his tricks.
Bookmark
This has been posted before and discussed at length. What, did you feel like stirring the pot on a Sunday night? The search function works 24/7, use it.
OK it is late. Is this person writing that Palin was taking a consistent position as McCain when she was the VP candidate?
It begins that there is nothing on record other than 3rd party hearsay.
Should Palin have taken an opposing view to the top of the ticket?
24 October 2008. Why so late in publishing this?
Voters should not be so emotional and enchanted with Palin, but always remember that she is just another politician. If it benefits her to throw you or me under the bus, she’ll do it in a Unalakleet minute.
RebelYell1990 = RomneyYell1990?
Would someone "pro-Amnesty" say that? I'm sure in the coming time we will get to know her true feelings on a lot of issues, as opposed to the McCain platform she had to share.
She did reluctantly defend also other McCain positions she did not agree on, like the Bailout and Cap and Trade. She forcefully rejected the latter recently.
I will never be accused of being in Sarah’s rah-rah corner, but, why are you bringing up this old news now, relative newbie? It only makes people like me remember that Mrs. Palin hasn’t been taking my rather excellent advice for quite some time now.
“Univision: Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 or 13 million undocumented immigrants?
Sarah Palin: No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty. You know, people have got to follow the rules. They’ve got to follow the bar, and we have got to make sure that there is equal opportunity and those who are here legally should be first in line for services being provided and...”
Sounds to me like she is talking out of both sides of her mouth. At first she says no, she says they should be first in line for the freebee’s and handout’s.
Too bad, I liked her, but she needs to change this position or at least clarify what her postion is.
If she is for amnesty then I need to move on to another person.
Nice try asswipe.
Sarah with Greta on immigration:
VAN SUSTEREN: Governor, you know, before economics hit us so heavily in the last month or so as a topic, the thing that grabbed people’s attention was illegal immigration. And that was the big problem for a long time. What’s your thought on that? I mean, what’s — how do can we fix the illegal immigration issue in this country?
GOV. SARAH PALIN: We’ve got to secure the borders, and we can’t be considering this broad range of amnesty that some would want. We’ve got to secure the borders and prove to the American people that the federal government is serious about this, and it’s got to be a comprehensive approach to dealing with the immigration challenge that we have — securing the borders, working with our border governors and mayors. They’re there on the front lines, understanding what some of the solutions can be, if only they have an administration who will work with them.
And McCain has a great comprehensive approach that he wants to take to this. It includes dealing humanely, too, with the 12 million or 13 million illegal immigrants that we have today also. But until we secure the borders, I don’t think Americans are even going to believe that we’re serious about fixing some of the problems that are just inherent with this challenge of so many illegal immigrants here.
Now, unfortunately, with McCain’s supporting proposal for this comprehensive approach to fixing problems there, there were about five poison pill amendments provided in the comprehensive approach that McCain wanted. And Barack Obama voted for those poison pills, killed the whole initiative, and we still have the problem that we have today.
Illegal immigration, though, is a perfect example of how these parties had better start working together, the D’s and the R’s, get it together if they’re serious about addressing the problem of illegal immigration. It’s not a Republican or a Democrat problem. It’s all of America’s issue.
Entire interview at link; scroll down to the end, as it’s one of the very last questions Greta asks of her.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,445872,00.html
Long explained and debunked. Try again.
If amnesty for (up to 30 million) illegals passes and becomes law, our national voting demographics will change forever.
Contained within the Kennedy/McCain/Bush amnesty bill was a little known fact buried in legal ease.
Those obtaining citizenship would be allowed to claim the unearned income tax credit.
Those new citizens under the poverty line could get up to $4 thousand back from the federal government when they file, and never have paid one red cent in taxes.
In other words, a huge federal handout to the tune of billions.
This was republicans and democrats trying to pass this thing.
Looks like this Rebel is yelling a bit too loudly for Mittens... sayanora to his candidacy, he doesn’t stand a chance against Sarah!