“Univision: Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 or 13 million undocumented immigrants?
Sarah Palin: No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty. You know, people have got to follow the rules. They’ve got to follow the bar, and we have got to make sure that there is equal opportunity and those who are here legally should be first in line for services being provided and...”
Sounds to me like she is talking out of both sides of her mouth. At first she says no, she says they should be first in line for the freebee’s and handout’s.
Too bad, I liked her, but she needs to change this position or at least clarify what her postion is.
If she is for amnesty then I need to move on to another person.
“Sounds to me like she is talking out of both sides of her mouth. At first she says no, she says they should be first in line for the freebee’s and handout’s.”
She is equivocating, yes.
She knows McCain’s position. It’s two weeks from election day, the ticket is struggling with independents (and latinos). She has not had time to seriously consider the issue - it not a major one in Alaska, she was parchuted into the campaign.
She equivocates? Seems to me that in itself is a give away, given the circumstances.
Note that she has different views than McCain, only expressed after the election. Eg, Cap and Trade.