Posted on 08/09/2009 6:56:23 PM PDT by RebelYell1990
She opposed McCain on discussing Reverend Wright, she opposed McCain on ANWR, she opposed McCain on taking North Korea off the terror list, and she opposed McCain on the Federal Marriage amendment. She said these things on the campaign trail, if she opposed McCain, she would have said it and would have said she would have tried to convince him of the other position. she is on record saying she opposes deportation and supports a pathway to citizenship. She didn’t crack down on sanctuary cities as governor and allowed illegals to get driver’s licenses during her time as governor.
I will support no pro-amnesty Republican ever! If Sahara wants to be for a “pathway to citizenship” my support fore her is gone.
I will turn my attention to Senator Jim DeMint who has been a strong vocal opponent to the 0bama administration.
I hope he doesn’t let me down either.
McCain will support Obama’s open borders plan to fix immigration. He supported his closure of Gitmo. He supported Obama’s cutting of defense appropriations. He thinks we should sign on to the environmental nonsense. He has applauded Obama on numerous occasions.
Just how clear is it even now? In truth, it isn’t. McCain is an enemy of this nation. Don’t kid yourself.
In other words you don't have anything to show to back up your BS, other than that garbage from the Dirty Digger. Right?
Sorry, my computer sont’ play those video links. If you have a point to make you’ll have to type it out.
Sorry, my computer sont’ play those video links. If you have a point to make you’ll have to type it out.
When did I say that? We have a quote from Sarah posted. Now prove to me it is false. Show me any place she said we should prosecute and deport illegals.
This quote you are touting -- where else did you see it from a reliable, unbiased source -- besides from that garbage authored by Dirty Digger?
I had a Univison interview and the article talking about the interview. I have Sarah Palin’s words, and her actions as governor, you have nothing but assumptions. And we know what they say about those who make assumptions. You realizeD igger is a conservative? You wouldn’t know as you didn’t read the article, the univision interview, or look at his site.
Who is they and what do 'they' say about assumptions?
You realizeD igger is a conservative?
HAHAHAHA!!! Even conservatives have been known to be liars. And I wouldn't believe that liar if he said he once had a mother. You wouldn’t know as you didn’t read the article, the univision interview, or look at his site.
If you claim to be a conservative, you just proved my point -- because all three of those assumptions are bald-faced lies.
Try again. meathead.
I’ve run into a few of them, the blind devotion is worrisome.
Agreed.
ok, well, it seems you have resorted to insults to back up your frivolous assumptions. You stray from the issue and move to insults when there is no proof to back up your position.
sont’ = won’t
The insults you have coming for being such a jackass. And speaking of assumptions, those three of your were lyting jokes.
You stray from the issue and move to insults when there is no proof to back up your position.
When are you going to give us some proof of what she said -- other than bullsh-t from one of the most disgusting muckraking, pornographic liars in the publishing business?
Now, call your mommy to come tuck you in -- it's past beddy-bye time for little boys.
Nighty night.
lyting - lying
You can dish out decent insults, but have yet to back up any of your frivolous assumptions. You haven’t backed up your assumptions, they aren’t based in fact and aren’t based off of Palin’s words or actions. And when her words are right in front of you, all you say is Univision and the author are liars. You are acting in a crude and petty manner.
Please tell me that you’re kiddig and that you’re really not this thickheaded?
VAN SUSTEREN: Governor, you know, before economics hit us so heavily in the last month or so as a topic, the thing that grabbed people's attention was illegal immigration. And that was the big problem for a long time. What's your thought on that? I mean, what's -- how do can we fix the illegal immigration issue in this country?
GOV. SARAH PALIN: We've got to secure the borders, and we can't be considering this broad range of amnesty that some would want. We've got to secure the borders and prove to the American people that the federal government is serious about this, and it's got to be a comprehensive approach to dealing with the immigration challenge that we have -- securing the borders, working with our border governors and mayors. They're there on the front lines, understanding what some of the solutions can be, if only they have an administration who will work with them.
And McCain has a great comprehensive approach that he wants to take to this. It includes dealing humanely, too, with the 12 million or 13 million illegal immigrants that we have today also. But until we secure the borders, I don't think Americans are even going to believe that we're serious about fixing some of the problems that are just inherent with this challenge of so many illegal immigrants here.
Now, unfortunately, with McCain's supporting proposal for this comprehensive approach to fixing problems there, there were about five poison pill amendments provided in the comprehensive approach that McCain wanted. And Barack Obama voted for those poison pills, killed the whole initiative, and we still have the problem that we have today.
Illegal immigration, though, is a perfect example of how these parties had better start working together, the D's and the R's, get it together if they're serious about addressing the problem of illegal immigration. It's not a Republican or a Democrat problem. It's all of America's issue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.