Posted on 08/05/2009 6:52:24 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY
Its time to return some sanity to the way ships are named. Why? Because the silliness is upon us once again:
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 83
Expressing the sense of Congress that a nuclear-powered aircraft
carrier of the Navy, either the aircraft carrier designated as CVN-79
or the aircraft carrier designated as CVN-80, should be named the
U.S.S. Barry M. Goldwater.
Bill information and status here
The nonsense began with CVN-70 and reached the height of historical blindness with the Truman (honestly, naming a carrier for a president who tried his hardest to kill naval aviation and oversaw the death of the United States (CVA-58) in favor of the B-36). Why not Enterprise (CVN-65 isnt long for this world)? Coral Sea? Yorktown? Hornet? Midway? Enough with the politicians these ships are going to last to the middle of the century and outlive many of us reading these words. Why not go back to naming the carriers after famous battles and reclaim some of our heritage and linkage with notable CVs from the past? And, BTW, what better way to celebrate naval aviations upcoming centenary?
And yes, Im familiar with Rickovers quote how about standing firm this time anyway?
(h/t: SB )
UPDATE: Heres the text of the petition should be available online w/in the next 24-hours.
Whereas the namesake ENTERPRISE has been proudly borne by two combat aircraft carriers of the United States Navy;
Whereas the first USS ENTERPRISE (CV-6) (seventh ship to bear this name) and her embarked airwing and crew gallantly fought in every major battle in the Pacific during World War Two, including the signatory battle at Midway when vastly outnumbered by the ships and planes of the Imperial Japanese Navys Combined Fleet, ENTERPRISE, with YORKTOWN and HORNET struck a mortal blow, sinking four enemy aircraft carriers and turning the tide of the war in the Pacific;
Whereas the same ENTERPRISE concluded that war as the most decorated warship in the United States Navy with 20 battle stars, a Presidential Unit Citation, a British Admiralty Pennant, Navy Unit Commendation, Philippine Presidential Unit Citation, and Task Force 16 Citation among many other accolades;
Whereas the second United States Navy aircraft carrier to be named ENTERPRISE (CVAN/CVN-65) was the first such ship of her class in the world to be nuclear powered;
Whereas that ENTERPRISE, the eighth ship to bear that name in the United States Navy is concluding a half-century of service to this nation and has honorably served in every theater of operations from leading the naval quarantine off Cuba in 1962 to conducting the first strikes following the terrorist attack on the United States on September 11th, 2001;
Be It Resolved
That the next nuclear aircraft carrier to be constructed (CVN-79) should bear the name USS ENTERPRISE in recognition and honor of the fighting men and women of the United States navy who have sailed in her namesakes through the centuries.
We The Undersigned:
Call upon the Congress of the United States to remand H. CON. RES. 83 and replace it with a resolution supporting the naming of CVN-79 or the next nuclear aircraft carrier to be constructed, the USS ENTERPRISE.
Call upon the Secretary of the Navy to support this petition of the tax-paying people of these United States and name the next nuclear aircraft carrier to be constructed the USS ENTERPRISE
UPDATE 2: Here is the petition
My favorites have always been those named for Revolutionary war battles; Cowpens, Saratoga, etc.
Ticonderoga and Yorktown are (or last were) cruisers.
We need to name a submarine after Kennedy.
Yeah, they gave USS America to the new LHA class. Better than a stick in the eye but that name should be a CVN.
Yorktown was a carrier, sunk at Midway. The Ti was indeed a cruiser, but I wasn’t speciying hull types, just like the names
A FReeper years ago told a great story of serving on the ship during Vietnam and how the Capt. of the ship challenged the Bainbridge and Long Beach (Nuke destroyer and cruiser) to a race to liberty port at Subic Bay. The Capt. had everything lashed down tight and told the crew to hang on...LOL. I'll never forget his description of the guys on the Big E watching the Bainbridge and Long Beach disappear over the horizon while the carrier lumbered up to speed, then left the smaller ships in its wake. Great story.
After CV-5 Yorktown was lost, CV-10 Yorktown (Essex class) was commissioned. Then, the fifth Yorktown (CG-48) was a guided missile cruiser, commissioned in 1984 and decommissioned in 2004.
Some suggested ship names for the Obama Navy: USS Diversity, USS Affirmative Action, USS Redistribution, USS Hugo Chavez......
Last time I was in your neck of the woods, I saw USS Warrior (MCM-10) from my condo balcony. She was sailing a pattern a mile or so off shore.
. . .until we name a **Starship** USS Enterprise, that is. . .
The last thing that moved out of there was the USS New Jersey on its way to 'Nam. Saw it from my senior English class!
USS Devastator
USS Executor
USS Dominator
If they really do retire the Lincoln early, it doesn't make much sense to do an extra refueling of an older hull.
I’m right on Hudson. where were you?
I’m right on Hudson. where were you?
I meant Panama City Beach. Did you relocate?
Part of the Carriers for Beercans initiative. If we get drunk enough we won’t notice how screwed we’regetting.
Panama City Beach.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.