Posted on 07/24/2009 6:44:02 AM PDT by iThinkBig
What exactly does Mr. Obama mean by disproportionately? African Americans and Latinos make up 28% of the U.S. population, but commit 60% of the crimes in the country. A non-racist would have said that he didn't have the facts and could not comment. He let the proverbial cat out of the bag. We now know exactly what he thinks. All the spinning by the White House can't change what he believes.
"Now, I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that," Mr. Obama continued. "But I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home; and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately. That's just a fact."
(Excerpt) Read more at ragingdebate.com ...
No ... but he IS a racist
Duh.....ya think?
ACORN...the black version of the KKK
Rascist? I dunno, but racist, definitely.
He’s an Obamist — it is all about him.
It is quite evident that there are at least two stupid people involved in this case and neither one of them is a police sergeant.
Show me a person that dosen’t discriminate or has any prejudices and I’ll call a mortician for them. Of course Obama is racist.
It is evident there are at least two ver stupi despicable racists in this affair ... neither of which are in the police department
The “typical White person” remark about his own Grandmother didn’t give it away?
Ya think!? Sure is.
" "Obama learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my father's model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday." ~Letter from L. DAVID ALINSKY, son of Neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky "
True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within. Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties....
"One Alinsky benefactor was Wall Street investment banker Eugene Meyer, who served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1930 to 1933. Meyer and his wife Agnes co-owned The Washington Post. They used their newspaper to promote Alinsky....Her series, called 'The Orderly Revolution', made Alinsky famous....
Alinsky's crowning achievement was his recruitment of a young high school student named Hillary Rodham. She met Alinsky through a radical church group. Hillary wrote an analysis of Alinsky's methods for her senior thesis at Wellesley College. ...
Many leftists view Hillary as a sell-out because she claims to hold moderate views on some issues. However, Hillary is simply following Alinsky's counsel to do and say whatever it takes to gain power.
"Barack Obama is also an Alinskyite.... Obama spent years teaching workshops on the Alinsky method. In 1985 he began a four-year stint as a community organizer in Chicago, working for an Alinskyite group called the Developing Communities Project.... Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing. While trying to build coalitions of black churches in Chicago, Obama caught flak for not attending church himself. He became an instant churchgoer." Hillary, Obama and the Cult of Alinsky ~by Richard Poe
"His name was Saul Alinsky, the mentor of Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the concierge emeritus of modern liberalism.... Alinsky was also the subject of the previously suppressed 1969 Wellesley Thesis by one Hillary Rodham.... [In it, she wrote that Alinsky's 1971 book] Rules for Radicals provides the organizer with a tactical style for community organization that assumes an adversarial relationship between groups of people in which one either dominates or is dominated. Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage." "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Rules for radicals ~by Saul Alinsky
Gee, I dunno.
Lets try his church
Try:
http://www.bollywoodsargam.com/video_todayfeaturedvideo.php?blockbustermovieclip=Prhnc2fxAzg——The_shocking_video_Barack_Obama_does_not_want_you__to_see!!_featured_hollywood_blockbuster_video.html
“I don’t know the details of what happened, I wasn’t there, but the police officer acted stupidly.”
He’s an illogical racist.
Of course he’s a racist but I believe Michelle trumps him. I’d like to hear more on the Secret Service agent recently fired at the White House. It would expose Michelle for the racist she is...
Obama certainly is not "post-racial"... he brings up race everytime he can.
In a word...YES!
But we all knew that didn’t we?
Keep in mind, that all the outrage and commotion about the apparent insensitivity towards non-blacks, simply directs attention AWAY from serious attacks on the American institutions that we have held sacred and beloved for generations, and the process of changing this country into something we have tried to resist for some 233 years, in the name of something called “the Declaration of Independence”.
I am all for the idea of allowing the “Untied States of America” to fracture along its natural fault lines, into a “Red Country” and a “Blue Country”. The “Red Country” would be nearly contiguous, the “Blue Country” would be a series of sometimes widely scattered islands.
“Red Country” would be dedicated to the restatement of the terms of the original Declaration of Independence, and would accept the existing US Constitution, excepting for the 16th, 17th, the despicable 18th, the now pointless 21st, the 23rd, and the 26th amendments.
“Blue Country” may adopt whatever the hell rules they want to administer their fiefdoms, but just stay clear away from trying to impose them on “Red Country”.
Attempts to infiltrate the “Red Country” by elements from the “Blue Country” shall be met with armed force and a very loose set of “rules of engagement”. Shoot first and ask later, winning forgiveness is much easier than seeking permission.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.