Skip to comments.
Obama may be a natural born citizen after all
Posted on 07/23/2009 8:07:18 PM PDT by DavidFarrar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 281 next last
To: Markos33
Unfortunately, we don't have sufficient corrorbative evidence to determine this issue. I wish we did.
As far as the adoption by Lolo Soetoro, I think due to Barry's age, it would be irrelevant as it pertains to Art. ll of the U.S. Constitution.
ex animo
davidfarrar
To: Secret Agent Man
While everything you say is correct, rightly or wrongly, it is to the legal implications of these facts I have based my conclusion upon.
ex animo
davidfarrar
To: GovernmentShrinker
It is the defining law of the land at that time which determined citizenship for all future Americans citizens.
It could have just as easily have required all future American citizens to go through a process of earning their citizenship franchise through a period of servitude to the state.
Natural born to CITIZENS CAN MEAN NOTHING ELSE BUT BORN TO TWO US CITIZENS
183
posted on
07/24/2009 9:33:38 AM PDT
by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
To: Crazieman
Good find, but this only proves that someone paid someone to print something. Pretty weak. If you happen to run across something like oh say, a BIRTH CERTIFICATE, that would be useful.
To: iowamark
I think you are wrong?
I think you are referring to the statutory meaning of "natural born", not the Constitutional meaning.
Please note, I am aware the Constitution has given Congress the authority to create naturalization laws. I am unaware of any authorization given to Congress by our Constitution that would allow it to change the Constitution itself.
ex animo
davidfarrar
To: John Valentine
I agree with everything you have stated. But, again, we must go to the main intent the framers had in authoring Art. ll, Section l, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, and that was the "allegiance" the child would be subject to during its upbringing.
In this particular case, Barry's upbringing was not controlled by the father, but by the mother, or more precisely, by the mother's parents. There are gaps of course, as there may be in a lot of backgrounds, but on the whole, as far as the framers' intent goes, I think Barack Obama Jr., would be a "natural born" citizen. Although, given his background and the general lack of corroborative evidence, I think it is a fair question.
ex animo
davidfarrar
To: DavidFarrar
The term “natural born citizen” is not defined in the Constitution, leaving it and the naturalization process to be defined by law. Congress has done so.
187
posted on
07/24/2009 10:17:43 AM PDT
by
iowamark
(certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
To: Crazieman
Somewhere there is a story that says that BOTH hospitals in question DID NOT list any male births on Aug 4.
188
posted on
07/24/2009 10:20:42 AM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Nemo me impune lacessit)
To: LegalAlien1949
Because the marriage was performed by a witchdoctor in Kenya?
189
posted on
07/24/2009 10:22:16 AM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Nemo me impune lacessit)
To: Teflonic
Do not forget “My Mother was a slut with a thing for Black guys.”
190
posted on
07/24/2009 10:24:36 AM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Nemo me impune lacessit)
To: usmcobra
You need to review basic grammar. If a sentence reads “Children of mothers who used cocaine during pregnancy . . . “, this does not mean children who were born to two mothers. Likewise, the passage “children of citizens of the United States” does not say that each child had two parents who were citizens. If the writers had meant to specify both parents, they could easily have said so. But it’s immaterial as applied to Obama, because the whole sentence applies only to people born outside of the United States.
191
posted on
07/24/2009 10:25:05 AM PDT
by
GovernmentShrinker
(Vote for a short Freepathon! Donate now if you possibly can!)
To: politicalmerc
The established law at this point is that a baby born on US soil is a citizen (period). A citizen, yes, but that child would not be a Natural Born Citizen.
You're as dense as the libs on this subject. No one's arguing what the law says about citizenship.
192
posted on
07/24/2009 10:25:37 AM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: usmcobra
Natural born to CITIZENS CAN MEAN NOTHING ELSE BUT BORN TO TWO US CITIZENS That is in no way correct. Children of illegal immigrants are natural-born US citizens.
193
posted on
07/24/2009 10:29:28 AM PDT
by
Travis T. OJustice
(I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
To: Windflier
The established law at this point is that a baby born on US soil is a citizen (period). A citizen, yes, but that child would not be a Natural Born Citizen.
Yes, it would a natural born citizen.
194
posted on
07/24/2009 10:31:00 AM PDT
by
Travis T. OJustice
(I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
To: Ahithophel
That appears to be an excellent and wellsourced site, thanks. You bet.
195
posted on
07/24/2009 10:34:05 AM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Travis T. OJustice
Yes, it would a natural born citizen. Then, we disagree. I'll go with the logic and reasoning of the Founders on the interpretation of what a natural born citizen is, thank you.
196
posted on
07/24/2009 10:36:49 AM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: missnry
Someone wrote that his mother was white and therefore, he was registered WHITE on his birth certificate...wherever the hell it is.
197
posted on
07/24/2009 10:38:21 AM PDT
by
Fawn
(Rush Limbaugh---> America's pinata)
To: iowamark
Congress has defined "natural born citizen" as it pertains to Art. ll, Sec. ll, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution?
Where?
ex animo
davidfarrar
To: Windflier
Do you have a link to a document back up your assertion, because that is not what i was taught.
199
posted on
07/24/2009 10:48:32 AM PDT
by
Travis T. OJustice
(I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
To: Windflier
Never mind, I see your link in a previous post.
200
posted on
07/24/2009 10:53:16 AM PDT
by
Travis T. OJustice
(I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 281 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson