Posted on 07/21/2009 10:35:47 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe
I have given the following letter to my neighbors:
Hello Neighbor:
You probably know that the decennial US Census is coming up soon. What you may not know is the degree to which the next census is being politicized by the current crop of crooks in Washington.
The census has one (and only one) purpose: to count the number of people. Period. Thats in the Constitution. But the plan now is to ask a number of invasive (and illegal) questions of citizens. Furthermore, people will supposedly be threatened with fines if they do not comply with the questioning. Even worse, census takers are being instructed to ask neighbors to rat on each other, if the first neighbor isnt home or refuses to comply. (This is assuming that the neighbors even know the correct answers in the first place!)
When the census taker comes to my house, I will tell him how many people live here and thats all. Any other questions will be met with Decline to answer no matter how much he protests or threatens. And, should he ask me any questions about you, I will answer Thats none of your business, and I wouldnt tell you even if I knew.
I want you, my neighbors, to know: under NO circumstances will I answer any questions about you. Your privacy and your rights are as important to me as are my own.
I have attached some articles of interest, if you wish to read more about this.
Please do not hesitate to get in touch if you would like to discuss this.
Your neighbor,
I also enclosed copies of the following articles:
EXCLUSIVE: Minn. lawmaker vows not to complete Census
,
Is it a fact that census takers have asked people for information on their neighbors? How slipshod can they get?
I couldn't agree more! ;-)
While you might be compelled to answer the census questions there is nothing that says you cannot provide vague or inaccurate answers ...like how are they really going to check. My wife may have distant Native American ancestry... so certainly that would be important to report her race as Native American. One can never be too sure of all your ancestry so perhaps my race is mixed. Having worked on the 2000 census as a program manager I can tell you that the data collected by these census workers is mostly junk anyway.
I *am* native American. I was born here.
>Having worked on the 2000 census as a program manager I can tell you that the data collected by these census workers is mostly junk anyway.
In 2000, NObama was not (ostensibly) Pres*ent, libs were not controlling the government, and ACORN thugs were not conducting the census. Times have changed.
The wording states “ if a person refuses to answer “any” of the questions, It does not say “all” of the questions.
I will only answer the very basic.
But the junk is used nevertheless, is it not?
Q: How many people live here?
A: X people live here.Q: What kind of car do you drive?
A: X people live here.Q: How many bathrooms do you have?
A: X people live here.Q: What is your political party?
A: X people live here.
The problem is the census clause in the Constitution, which provides Congress with some wiggle room. They have to conduct an ‘enumeration,’ but it’s to be done, ‘in such manner as they shall by law direct.’ Congress has subsequently directed that they will ask additional questions, so there are relevant statutes on the books. If think you’re instinctively right, by the plain meaning of the Constitution, but the Courts have a way of interpreting the Constitution to mean all sorts of things that it clearly does not, and failure to comply will mean fines, etc. Personally, I think it’s worth the risk...it may give you standing to challenge it in court, but everyone should be aware of what they’re getting into - a potential protracted fight with the Census Bureau and ultimately the Congress.
Do you have any information about people REALLY being fined for not answering questions not directly related to the number of people?
Is not cooperating with them a crime? Does it impact one’s qualifications to own firearms?
However, I have read elsewhere that it is better (legally) to decline to answer than give false info. I don't know if that's true.
If that's the case, I'll give an answer. It may not be an answer they'll understand, but it will be an answer!
I worked the 2000 census as a second shift clerk in a regional office. I can say with some assurance that if you glued three average office rats together you could scrape up enough IQ to emulate a fine igneous rock. I could tell stories at length but it would just cause taxpayers pain to have to hear how their money was pi$$ed away.
Regards,
GtG
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.