Dammit I'm getting sick of pointing this out: there were TWO sets of photos depicting BHO's COLB - one plainly a forgery, the other very convincingly real. Way too many birthers are fixated on the first and clueless about the second, which makes them clueless. Get that point straight before you continue with this!!!
“document examiners have identified several unmistakable defects and anomalies in the provided COLB”
“Dammit I’m getting sick of pointing this out: there were TWO sets of photos depicting BHO’s COLB - one plainly a forgery, the other very convincingly real. Way too many birthers are fixated on the first and clueless about the second, which makes them clueless. Get that point straight before you continue with this!!!”
*******************
Well, thank you for that important information. It is amazing no one has picked up on that. I imagine you are getting sick.
To say nothing of the fact the forgers have so far avoided facing a long list of very serious federal criminal charges.
You may be referring the COLB Obama told the judge he placed on the internet, no attorney would dare lie about that in court. Perhaps you would be kind enough to provide a link?
Polarik needs to know about this right away before he expends further efforts.
It would be helpful if you have a theory that helps us get around the fact the issuer of the COLB specifies the document is not conclusive proof of U.S. citizenship.
“one plainly a forgery, the other very convincingly real”
1. Are these images available for viewing? Posted on line somewhere?
2. If a real one was available, why was a forgery offered in the first place?
3. In this day and age, what constitutes “convincingly real?” Bet I could do one with photoshop that would look real when viewed as a jpeg on the Inet.
4. The conservatives here are honest. They would rather discover the truth than be right at the expense of the truth. If a convincingly real COLB was presented, why is that fact not broadly known and accepted here?