Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the GOP elite despises Sarah Palin
WorldNetDaily ^ | 07-16-09 | Jane Chastain

Posted on 07/16/2009 8:59:16 AM PDT by euram

I think it's pretty clear that Sarah Palin doesn't really want to be president. However, she understands how desperately this country needs reform and, if no one else is available who can get the job done, she likely will take off her apron, put down her hunting rifle, dust herself off and run for the office.

One thing is sure. She will have to climb over the GOP establishment before she gets to the White House.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: chastain; elitists; jealousromney; palin; palin2012; palinhaters; pds; romney; romneyantigop; romneyantipalin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: euram
Resigning as governor of Alaska was not a smart political move.

Master politician Willie Brown says otherwise...

Sarah Palin, political genius

21 posted on 07/16/2009 9:22:09 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram
Why the GOP elite despises Sarah Palin

It's very clear to me why . . . . she's the reflection of what they are supposed to be. They look in the mirror and see her looking back at them, asking what happened to their conservative values. Every bill they vote on to expand government and raise taxes, they see her looking back at them, wanting to know when they gave up on America and freedom. Every maxist scheme they approve that reduces the ability of businesses to operate in a free market, she is there, looking back at them asking when they abandoned the free market.

That's why they despise her. They can't stand the pressure of being Democrat lites when they are supposed to be small government conservatives.

22 posted on 07/16/2009 9:25:37 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exist

The most annoying part is the number of Sarah Palin articles whoe titles start with “Why....” with such an overwhelming abundance of cluelessness on the part of the authors....left AND right.


23 posted on 07/16/2009 9:26:28 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (What kind of organization answers the phone if you call a suicide hotline in Gaza City?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA

Rush is talking about this right now. He says that there are too many Republicans who allow the media to define our candidates.


24 posted on 07/16/2009 9:26:50 AM PDT by Eva (union motto - Aim for mediocrity, it's only fair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

How right you are...


25 posted on 07/16/2009 9:27:12 AM PDT by justkate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon
We have to work to systematically eject RINOs from the party

There is a huge difference between "ejecting" those whom you deem to be RINOs, and saying: "I'm not going to pander to you, but do what I believe to be right. Please join me."

I don't see any sign that Palin wants to eject anyone from the Republican Party. I also don't see much sign is prepared to water down her beliefs to pander to the so called moderates. I like that. The Moderates/RINOs/N.E. Republicans will jump on the bandwagon when we find someone who can drive it well.

Its hard to move forward when you have formed a circular firing squad.

26 posted on 07/16/2009 9:27:29 AM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

“It’s Sarah (the party outsider) and her supporters against the inside the Beltway Republican machine. It will be a EPIC battle if they want. The Republican Party may not survive it though.”

The party will survive. Just not as it was. A good thing, in my opinion.


27 posted on 07/16/2009 9:29:10 AM PDT by jessduntno (You quit when you're in over your head. You resign when there isn't enough challenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: euram
I think it's pretty clear that Sarah Palin doesn't really want to be president

Stopped reading right there.

28 posted on 07/16/2009 9:29:51 AM PDT by Pistolshot (Brevity: Saying a lot, while saying very little.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram
Late in October, The American Spectator's The Prowler revealed:
"Former Mitt Romney presidential campaign staffers, some of whom are currently working for Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin's bid for the White House,
have been involved in spreading anti-Palin spin to reporters, seeking to diminish her standing after the election.
'Sarah Palin is a lightweight, she won't be the first, not even the third, person people will think of when it comes to 2012,'
says one former Romney aide, now working for McCain-Palin.
'The only serious candidate ready to challenge to lead the Republican Party is Mitt Romney.
He's in charge on November 5th.'"
The Prowler added: "Some former Romney aides were behind the recent leaks to media, including CNN, that Governor Sarah Palin was a 'diva' and was going off message intentionally."
The Romney supporters in the McCain campaign had access to internal polling which indicated well in advance of the November 4 election that McCain had no chance to win.
So they began working to position their man Mitt for a run in 2012. Just two days after the election,The Palmetto Scoop reported:
"One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"I’m told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palin’s people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romney’s former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
These aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.
Erick Erickson, who organized Operation Leper, said:
"Here’s what I think: I think there are some staffers on the McCain campaign who seriously screwed up the roll out of Sarah Palin, to which Governor Palin herself objected.
These staffers are now out trying to finish her off thinking, as typical D.C. types do, that if they don’t do it to her, she’ll do it to them. They just never understood who Palin is or what she is about."
"Likewise, I do think there are some staffers and others who expect Mitt Romney to run again in 2012,
they decided McCain could not win, and decided to undermine Sarah Palin and her chances hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."

29 posted on 07/16/2009 9:30:41 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"

"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"

"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"

"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"

"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"

30 posted on 07/16/2009 9:31:24 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
She did it because it was in the best interest of her state. When is the last time a politician did something – on purpose– that was not in his or her best interest?

That's enough to vote for her right there!

31 posted on 07/16/2009 9:31:33 AM PDT by conservativegramma ((No taxation without constitutional representation!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

“Elections are won
by candidates who unite
not those who splinter.”

Well, that would be Gov. Palin, then.


32 posted on 07/16/2009 9:31:41 AM PDT by jessduntno (You quit when you're in over your head. You resign when there isn't enough challenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eva

James Carville (DNC): "It's a feel-good story, this Romney thing. Romney is an ascendant guy."

33 posted on 07/16/2009 9:32:42 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mkcc30
Subversives...yes...cowards...yes....bigots...hell yes.
34 posted on 07/16/2009 9:34:49 AM PDT by roses of sharon (It is not actual suffering but a taste of better things which excites people to revolt: Hoffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

“There is a huge difference between “ejecting” those whom you deem to be RINOs, and saying: “I’m not going to pander to you, but do what I believe to be right. Please join me.”

RINOs are not deemed to be; they are. Everyone on this board can name them; they will not change who they are because we ask thenm to “join us.” They will get elected and then do what they always do.

Why be a Republican if you have to be a democrat to be one?


35 posted on 07/16/2009 9:36:31 AM PDT by jessduntno (You quit when you're in over your head. You resign when there isn't enough challenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
I am right there with you. I hope when she climbs over the RINO’s, it leaves a mark.

RINOs need to be very fearful right now, but I think they haven't got a clue what's coming at them.

36 posted on 07/16/2009 9:38:46 AM PDT by alarm rider (My tagline lives right next door to Jim Thompson!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: exist
The most annoying part is: WHY ARE THEY EVEN THE PARTY? Why are they even Republicans, when they evidently have so much more in common with liberals than they do with conservatives

That is a bit puzzling, isn't it? I have been asking myself that question for many years now. I can't say that I have the correct answer, but I think it has something to do with power. If these liberal Republicans became Democrats, they would not have any power in the Democrat party. And since they think they have a right to rule, they will remain in a party where they have power now.

37 posted on 07/16/2009 9:41:25 AM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA
That, and she was being sued all to hell. The left plays dirty, criminal actually, and then their enemies go away.

So why can't the same be turned against them? Plenty of lawsuit and ethics charge material exists!

38 posted on 07/16/2009 9:43:17 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon
You are obviously unschooled on how politics works or you're one of the many fake conservatives at FR lately who travel from thread to thread denouncing RINOs and making the case that it's better to lose on principle than win.

It is not "meaningless" having a guy with an (R) behind his name, because as anyone who took Social Studies knows, it's not possible to do ANYTHING without being in the majority and even boobs like Lincoln Chaffey contribute to your majority.

Why do I suspect you know this?

39 posted on 07/16/2009 9:48:59 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stripes1776
If these liberal Republicans became Democrats, they would not have any power in the Democrat party. And since they think they have a right to rule, they will remain in a party where they have power now.

That whole "power" thing needs to be reset by strict TERM LIMITS, to prevent individuals from enriching themselves to the point of ignoring right and wrong. And they MUST be subject to everything that they subject US to!

40 posted on 07/16/2009 9:50:24 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson