Click ON ME!
Posted on 07/15/2009 7:58:32 AM PDT by aic4ever
We would all be much better served if people like Stefan Cook and his lunatic lawyer would find a way to articulate their opposition to Obama through discussion and real grass roots activism. You're an engineer, Major Cook. You've obviously got a rational brain in there somewhere. You're a lawyer, Ms. Taitz. You may not have a rational brain in there because of that, but you at least have one that has to be functioning highly on some level.
(Excerpt) Read more at organizedexploitation.blogspot.com ...
So why doesn’t he produce the long form birth certificate & end all this?
This is likely. I also expect the MSM to make an example of Major Cook on behalf of Obama.
What remains to be seen is if anyone else, and how many, will try the same. Either we have a 'Rosa Parks' in Major Cook or another flash in the pan.
The war on poverty is a quagmire.
Some of us have sorta let it slide that "BHO" probably isn't strictly IAW the law Re US citizenship; yet his peculiar behaviors and radical policies do raise questions over his true intentIon for us.
But, If you don't care our President isn't a natural born Citizen and in Violation of the Constitution, and where were headed under his administration, then delete this and stay content in your cocoon. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Let's ask and try to answer some very good & interesting questions.
While most of us have shown little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question:
What passport did he use when as a younger man he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi?
Then too, how did one who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?
And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?
The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, we must have answers.
This makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.
Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A : Yes, by his own admission.
Q: What passport did he travel under?
A: There are only three possibilities:
1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport;
2) He traveled with a British passport; or
3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.
Conclusion:
When Mr. Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British or an Indonesian passport.
If he were traveling with a British passport that would strongly suggest that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. Or, if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.
Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008... keep in mind, under the name Barry Sotero he also applied for a Fullbight scholarship reserved for non- U. S. Citizens, and affirmed that he wasn't an American.
Given the destructive nature of his plans for America , as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.
How sad and revealing that Russian immigrant and attorney Orly Taitz has to move this case forward. It begs the question “WHERE THE HELL ARE THE U.S. BORN ATTORNEYS ON THIS ONE?”
My guess is that they are afraid of Obama and have never lived under the tyrannical system he is building here before our eyes. Orly came to America to escape that system and does not want to live under it here.
I’ve been reading the fascinating Walter Isaacson biography “Benjamin Franklin: An American Life” and came across this on page 153. It helps to explain the “wussification” of so many of the men in this country, to wit:
“He (Franklin) told the story of some Massachusetts commissioners who invited the Indians to send a dozen of their youth to study free at Harvard. The Indians replied that they had sent some of their young braves to study there years earlier, but on their return ‘...they were absolutely good for nothing, being neither acquainted with the true methods for killing deer, catching beaver, or surprising an enemy.’ They offered instead to educate a dozen or so white children in the ways of the Indians ‘...and make men of them’.”
Some thoughts on that paragraph:
* Didn’t Obama – and a lot of today’s lawyers — go to Harvard?
* Didn’t klintoon also attend Harvard? However, he apparently DID master the art of “catching beaver.”
* Too bad the commissioners didn’t take the Indians up on their counter-offer. Perhaps we’d have more MEN — like the two military men who HAVE challenged the Usurper-in-Chief — here today if they had.
This is how the sentence SHOULD read.
Old and erroneous information is very difficult to kill on the internet. Pakistan was under an advisory at the time, but was not on any “no travel” list.
That he was traveling or potentially traveling on an Indonesian passport, at that time and that age, at all, is where the interest lies. If Barry/Barack Dunham/Obama/Soetoro/round-and-round-it-goes, et. al, had reached the age of majority and was still doing so, it poses problems for any claim of US citizenship from early childhood. And, if there is no US citizenship for Obama from early childhood, there isn’t any at all, because he has not been naturalized.
I have a necktie smarter than Paul.
The more the merrier. If that slimeball is found to be a fraud (and I am sure he is -- the FACTS point there), any troops captured by the enemy can be shot -- not being over there under legal orders, and thus tecnically on their own.
... the last defense that the Liberals have when they know they've been caught.
IMHO, Orly Taitz is erratic at best, and a nut at worst. There are a few FReepers who can tell you a few things, about trying to help her and getting personal and professional reputations dragged through the mud by her to cover her own butt and her own wild tales, when it suits her purposes.
I’ve often thought she was a deliberate diversion and a plant, to discredit any effort at discovery, myself.
I’ll change that opinion if and when anything concrete comes of this.
The documents,Obama, just the documents.
Remind your liberal friends and family that the Democrats are the original “birthers”.
It was the Democrat Party that first went after John McCain and his place of birth. It was Democrat operatives that sued John McCain over the fact that being born in Panama disqualified him from being president.
If not for these actions, I doubt anyone would have thought to do the same to the rogue Kenyan.
Click ON ME!
A poster on another thread said that Olbermann had named him "Idiot of the Day" or something like that. So it's started.
That would make an excellent editorial, “The Original Birthers.”
Of the various sympathetic sites or commentators out there, who would do the best job of getting this meme into circulation?
Rush, of course, but he’s still being very cagey and only poking at the periphery.
Ann Coulter would slaughter them, but to my knowledge she hasn’t touched the issue at all.
So, who?
I finally bought one of those zip-up ties in dark blue. Now that’s a smart & handy necktie.
Good point!
and by having it posted here, he has gotten the most visitors to his “site” that he will ever get.
Maybe you would like to back that up with some verifiable facts?????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.