Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin and the Scum of the Earth
baseballcrank.com ^ | 07/14/09 | baseball crank

Posted on 07/14/2009 10:14:57 AM PDT by DFG

If there is a lesson to be learned from Sarah Palin's withdrawal from public office, it is this: if you want to take out a female politician, you go after her children.

There is likely no one and single reason for Palin's withdrawal, and she cited a bunch of them in her disorganized "you won't have Sarah Palin to kick around anymore" speech. But two things seem to explain most logically Palin's behavior: she was ground down by the unusually vitriolic campaign waged against her, and the aspect of that campaign that did the most damage was the attacks on her children.

(Excerpt) Read more at baseballcrank.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: palin; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2009 10:14:57 AM PDT by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DFG

And the frivolous lawsuits/ethics complaints.


2 posted on 07/14/2009 10:17:38 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

If votes count for anything....

this should be a sidebar highlight!

Palin/Romney 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!


3 posted on 07/14/2009 10:17:48 AM PDT by TitansAFC (The retarded 1950s GOP of today still thinks the public wants statesmanlike losers. We want fighters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG
There is likely no one and single reason for Palin's withdrawal, and she cited a bunch of them in her disorganized "you won't have Sarah Palin to kick around anymore" speech

It was more of a very well thought out kick-butt and take names speech. Nothing disorganized about it. Everyone talks about the speech, but has anyone actually listened to it all or read it?

4 posted on 07/14/2009 10:18:57 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG
One must attribute at least part of the vileness of these attacks, among left-wing blogs, to how very few of the leading left-wing bloggers have children of their own - were conservatives tempted to mock Obama's daughters, they would at least have to face their own daughters and sons at the end of a day of doing so. A political movement of the childless has no empathy for children. Empathy for other human beings requires human decency, and decency breeds hesitation - a hesitation the Online Left has never displayed. Were any of these people capable of shame, they would be feeling it. Instead, they have been gleefully dancing on Palin's political grave ever since. It is worth considering what the "New Politics" has looked like when applied to Sarah Palin, because it presents a cautionary tale for Republicans with families.

Blog post of the day, I'd say.

5 posted on 07/14/2009 10:19:54 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
No RINOs please!

How about Palin/Cheney 2012 ?

...Liz Cheney that is.

6 posted on 07/14/2009 10:21:05 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Palin/Romney 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!

What kind of plaform would THAT be? The Capitalist/Socialist ticket? The Conservative/Liberal ticket?

It makes no sense. Romney is the type of candidate Democrats a few decades ago would have run.

7 posted on 07/14/2009 10:21:34 AM PDT by SolidWood (Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DFG

The mission was to keep the first female candidate elected to high office, from being a Republican. Just like the Democrats did to Emilio Garza (proposed first latino Supreme) any means necessary would be used to stop her permanently.


8 posted on 07/14/2009 10:22:26 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

“Palin/Romney 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!”

That would be like baking a cake and frosting it with crap!

Nobody is going to buy that!


9 posted on 07/14/2009 10:25:32 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DFG

It would actually be 3 things.

#3. Lack of support from Republican Establishment types and self-anointed intellectuals.


10 posted on 07/14/2009 10:27:11 AM PDT by fortunate sun (What's fat, ugly, lives in Alaska and makes Grendel's mother smell like roses? Linda Kellen Biegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
It was more of a very well thought out kick-butt and take names speech. Nothing disorganized about it. Everyone talks about the speech, but has anyone actually listened to it all or read it?

______________________________________

I saw it on Fox as it happened. My opinion is that the long speech was both...well thought out at times and clearly disjointed at other times.

The weak point for me...she says that lame duck governors waste the state's money by filling their schedules with vacation-like junkets and that she is leaving early to spare the people of Alaska that waste. Come on. Stay on the job and don't take the trips...there's no law that says you have to.

11 posted on 07/14/2009 10:27:27 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Deb

The mission was to keep the first female candidate elected to high office, from being a Republican.
______

I think you are premature in your notion that a conspiracy was afoot to keep Gov Palin out of the veep mansion.

Did not the GOP seal its own fate with the nomination of McCain? Could he or would he have won with anyone less than the reincarnation of Reagan?


12 posted on 07/14/2009 10:27:34 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Palin/Romney 2012 would be like Reagan/Bush in 1982. The single mistake by Reagan of choosing Bush has, after 3 Bush family presidential terms, undone his whole “revolution.”


13 posted on 07/14/2009 10:29:28 AM PDT by Woebama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

The GOP base got screwed by RINO McCain in 2008. Why would we want another RINO like Romney at the top of the ticket in 2012?

Palin/Barbour 2012!!!


14 posted on 07/14/2009 10:30:59 AM PDT by DFG (1 useless man is called a disgrace, 2 are called a law firm, 3 or more are called Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DFG

If the author weren’t playing the “concern troll” role here, I might be interested in his opinion. He states as fact a number of things that are either arguable or simply factually incorrect while feigning concern for women, the GOP and the future of conservatism.


15 posted on 07/14/2009 10:32:07 AM PDT by Uriah_lost (Is there no balm in Gilead?....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
Come on. Stay on the job and don't take the trips...there's no law that says you have to.

Come on. She was harrassed for doing governor business, promoting state interests and defending herself.

Her point that continuing that "business" was a waste personally and for the state is valid.

16 posted on 07/14/2009 10:36:41 AM PDT by SolidWood (Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DFG

If the political parties were reversed the harpies on The View would still be shredding the couch with their teeth.


17 posted on 07/14/2009 10:37:09 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmz
When he named her, the media was expecting Pawlenty and they had a full box of mud ready to throw at him, but when he named Sarah and the conservatives went nuts and the McCain numbers jumped, it scared the crap out of them. They dedicated every waking second to destroying her, her Governship and her family.

We probably know that McCain was doomed, but they got blind-sided. A grassroots movement that builds behind her presidency for the next five years is their biggest nightmare. They're trying to take her out permanently now.

18 posted on 07/14/2009 10:37:36 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

No, her point (one of them) was that lame-duck governors waste state dollars on junkets. My point is - so don’t take junkets, not every governor does. That was one of her reasons for quitting and it is very weak.


19 posted on 07/14/2009 10:39:15 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
Come on. Stay on the job and don't take the trips...there's no law that says you have to.

But what about the endless ethics complaints. It makes no sense for her to stay in office. Palin is a punching bag from both sides if she stays in office. She does a campaign trip, she is hit by liberals with ethics complain. She does not do a campaign trip, she is hit by 'republicans' saying Palin is not dedicated. Palin's reason for quitting was freedom. The freedom to fight the fight. As governor, she had her hands tied and was getting beaten up and it was not good for the people of Alaska and it was not good for her.

20 posted on 07/14/2009 10:39:21 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson