First Lady Requires More Than Twenty Attendants

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12652 ^

[allmendream]

I just think this heaps discredit upon the source, and many of us for buying their cheap propaganda.

There is a lot of ugliness towards the present First Lady, and I find it both misdirected attention to the irrelevant (as all “First Lady”ies are essentially irrelevant) and ungentlemanly - and only relevant in that it makes us look ungentlemanly.

[eyedigress]

Maybe the idiot One will appoint a First Lady Czar and be done with it.

[saquin]

You can take the woman out of the ghetto, but you can’t take the ghetto out of the woman?

I must be "ghetto" then because I certainly don't dress up to walk the dog.

[Ron C.]

a link to what you found would be helpful... (i.e., the actual number of Laura Bush staff members)

I've been searching for some time now, and didn't find a list... but, then I'm not an expert at the search-engine lingo either.

[chiefqc]

And with all those attendants she still looks like this.

[saquin]

a link to what you found would be helpful... (i.e., the actual number of Laura Bush staff members)

Maybe the original article should have done such a minimum amount of research too, no?

[Chode]

that'd be the first thing i've heard of that the boy is qualified for...

[mewzilla]

It’s ridiculous that modern first ladies have these types of entourages.

I'll second that.

[Atom Smasher]

To each their own?

[manc]

THANK YOU

I hope all see this and now realise that the first lady is nothing .
She is most certainly not stylish or classy.

Enlarge the picture and WOW

Thank you again

[manc]

nail on head

[Atom Smasher]

If you care to view my previous post, you will clearly see that I am referring to her poor taste in clothing, when she is dressed up!

Thank you.

[Atom Smasher]

Thanks manc!

[saquin]

Do you refer to everyone with what you call “poor taste in clothing” as “ghetto”? Just curious.

[allmendream]

Check the last time this BS from CANADACRAPPYFREEPRESS or whatever was posted on FR.

Or I guess I could just find it for you....

http://www.newsmax.com/kessler/first_lady_laura_bush/2008/10/07/138049.html

“Laura Bush traveled to Afghanistan in March 2005. Her staff of 21 was not told of the plans.”

So the last first lady also “Requires More than Twenty Attendants”.

Can we not post things from half arsed lousy propaganda sources anymore?

[manc]

no probs

I have heard this statement before many times and it is true

no matter how much money , no matter how they pretend to act the real person will always come out.

you cannot buy class.

You keep up the good posts and the fight.

[TRY ONE]

Since THIS Administration is BIG on Affirmative Action, can anyone provide a “diversity breakdown” of the noted Staff???????????????

[Atom Smasher]

Now your playing with symantecs. I will not go round & round with you on this issue. Nor will I explain my deep resentment of what these people got away with in scamming their way into the WH.

Her & her husband are creatures of the lowest form...take that & make what you want of it!

[saquin]

You keep up the good posts and the fight.

YES! By all means, keep up the good fight against bad clothing. What would this country be without such brave men? I shudder to consider the consequences.

[saquin]

Methinks you dost protest too much. And methinks your “ghetto” does not mean what you want to pretend it means.