Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Lady Requires More Than Twenty Attendants
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12652 ^

Posted on 07/09/2009 6:19:43 PM PDT by cycle of discernment

First Lady Requires More Than Twenty Attendants Dr. Paul L. Williams

July 7, 2009

“In my own life, in my own small way, I have tried to give back to this country that has given me so much,” she said. “See, that’s why I left a job at a big law firm for a career in public service, “ Michelle Obama

No, Michele Obama does not get paid to serve as the First Lady and she doesn’t perform any official duties.

But this hasn’t deterred her from hiring an unprecedented number of staffers to cater to her every whim and to satisfy her every request in the midst of the Great Recession.

Just think Mary Lincoln was taken to task for purchasing china for the White House during the Civil War.

And Mamie Eisenhower had to shell out the salary for her personal secretary.

How things have changed!

If you’re one of the tens of millions of Americans facing certain destitution, earning less than subsistence wages stocking the shelves at Wal-Mart or serving up McDonald cheeseburgers, prepare to scream and then come to realize that the benefit package for these servants of Miz Michele are the same as members of the national security and defense departments and the bill for these assorted lackeys is paid by John Q. Public:

$172,2000 - Sher, Susan (CHIEF OF STAFF)

$140,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (DEPUTY ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR OF POLICY AND PROJECTS FOR THE FIRST LADY)

$113,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND WHITE HOUSE SOCIAL SECRETARY)

$102,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE FIRST LADY)

Winter, Melissa E. (SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF TO THE FIRST LADY)

(continued at link)

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: angrywoman; bho44; chewbacca; firstlady; flotusmichelle; gildedwookie; meanlady; michelleobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: cycle of discernment
The Multi-million-dollar per-year first lady!

One million for personal aides, assistants, etc.

Then there's the million-dollar per-year diet...

Then there's the 5 million-dollar travel for fun fees...

Then there's the million-dollar clothing budget...

Last, but certainly not least, the 8 million-dollar per year date-night budget.

Bottom line - most expensive female in US government history.

21 posted on 07/09/2009 6:41:09 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Seesh, for all that money we sure aren’t getting much, she’s tough to look at.


22 posted on 07/09/2009 6:46:55 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries for the American farmer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

I had to google that. You are correct.


23 posted on 07/09/2009 6:47:48 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Pretending the Admin Moderator doesn't exist will result in suspension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

I’d bet Pelosi costs more.


24 posted on 07/09/2009 6:48:53 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Pretending the Admin Moderator doesn't exist will result in suspension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Remember at first she called the staff “servants”?


25 posted on 07/09/2009 6:49:43 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Yep!

Laura had exactly ONE less staff member.


26 posted on 07/09/2009 6:50:16 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RJL

Remember when she said we all should have a personal assistant? Who does she think is paying for her luxury? How


27 posted on 07/09/2009 6:54:27 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Is this really “unprecedented”? There’s zero evidence in the article to support that assertion. These sound like standard job titles. Without a comparable list from previous administrations, this “article” tells us nothing, does it?


28 posted on 07/09/2009 6:57:21 PM PDT by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saquin

Laura Bush had exactly ONE less staff member working for the “office” of the First Lady.

This “article” tells you nothing because it doesn’t WANT to inform you with easily available and relevant information.


29 posted on 07/09/2009 6:59:53 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: manc
Here ya go........our First Lady taking her ass (and a dog) for a walk with her bra strap showing. How chic! And stylish! A real trendsetter!

She's got the Oprah syndrome......primped and airbrushed looks fine......caught without makeup and lights, looks feature-heavy and low class.


30 posted on 07/09/2009 7:01:03 PM PDT by Lizavetta (Politicians: When they're not lying, they're stealing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

There’s been a LOT of that here lately. Very disheartening. I prefer to deal in facts, not wild-eyed bulls**t.


31 posted on 07/09/2009 7:01:27 PM PDT by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Laura Bush had exactly ONE less staff member working for the “office” of the First Lady.

This “article” tells you nothing because it doesn’t WANT to inform you with easily available and relevant information.


Shhhh....just let them do whatever they want. The internet never forgets but some people on this forum don't seem to realize that.
32 posted on 07/09/2009 7:02:55 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (Fides et Audax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
what... no azz wipers???
33 posted on 07/09/2009 7:03:29 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - Obama is basically Jim Jones with a teleprompter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

The Queen of England doesn’t have that many servants. Geesh!


34 posted on 07/09/2009 7:05:14 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode
what... no azz wipers???

That's Barry's job.
35 posted on 07/09/2009 7:05:59 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

You mean to tell me that out of all these servants, she does not have one person to tell her how to dress properly? Has anyone noticed those clothes that she wears?

Between her nasty facial expressions, and her nasty selection in clothes, the only servant that would do her justice is one she has to wipe her nasty hindside!

...and I feel very sorry for THAT servant!


36 posted on 07/09/2009 7:09:18 PM PDT by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
The Queen of England doesn’t have that many servants. Geesh!

I think we have a ways to go to rival that. The Queen has a household staff numbering about 1200.

37 posted on 07/09/2009 7:09:54 PM PDT by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

20 attendants,and not one of them owns a travel iron!


38 posted on 07/09/2009 7:10:32 PM PDT by Palladin (Let's help Sarah take back America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

It’s ridiculous that modern first ladies have these types of entourages.

No first lady should have more than a couple assistants.

Another sign that our elected officials and their families have become royalty although they like to call themselves public servants.

What a joke.


39 posted on 07/09/2009 7:10:39 PM PDT by skyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta; manc

What is the saying? You can take the woman out of the ghetto, but you can’t take the ghetto out of the woman?

Hmmmmm....


40 posted on 07/09/2009 7:12:35 PM PDT by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson