Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Embryonic Stem Cells, and Abortions
Barry's Obamanation ^ | 7-8-09 | Jesse Ellis

Posted on 07/08/2009 8:49:55 AM PDT by 51773photo

I read yesterday, that some people in England, who had access to a murdered baby, cannibalized parts from that baby to use in an experiment.

Now, a lot of people would not be bothered by this, because the child was dead anyway, and besides, transplants are done all the time form donors.

However there is one thing that makes this story wrong. The baby was killed just for the parts.

Society has degenerated so low, as to honesty think that the killing of a child for experimental purposes is ok.

What is it they say? If you do or say something that is wrong, long enough, loud enough, by enough people in that society, then it begins to sound ok?

There was also a video clip of the story. The announcers were all giddy and happy, as though they did not know a child the butchering of a child was involved. Maybe they did, who knows?

Some people say that an embryo is not a child, yet.

I ask, do the number of individual cells within a child, or where that child lives, determine if it is a child? How many cells does a developing baby have to have to obtain personage?

What if he or she is one cell off? Does that one cell mean the difference between ‘bio mass’ and ‘Bobby’ or ‘Becky’?

When a child is conceived, it begins a growing process that does not end, until it is an adult. All during this growth period, cells are dividing and growing. The person grows, gains weight, and develops. It makes no difference where it lives, it continues to develop. That’s what people do.

What right do we have, as fellow humans to determine that chosen individuals, at a certain point in their life, at a certain point in their maturation process, are to be put to death, for the purpose of medical experimentation?

Can no one see that this is murder?

Isn’t that what Hitler did as well? Didn’t he use children in obscene experiments? Didn’t he have them put to death, just to see what he could do with them?

Does a Childs’ dependence on its mother stop at birth? No Can a baby who is outside the womb, fend for itself? No

Can people not see, that all arguments in defense of these actions serve only one thing purpose; to anesthetize peoples’ minds, to the unspeakable horror that kids go through each and every day.

A lot of people feel that they have a soul. Do you? When did you get it? Was it at birth? Was it before birth? Was it when you were conceived as the Bible says?

And, what is birth? At what point, exactly, is one born? Is it a sliding out process? Does 95% out mean born? What about 99.9%. Will ¼ “be enough to withhold the rights of being a person? Does it occur when the cord is cut? What if the cord is cut while the child has not left the mother?

Does any see how utterly silly, the location of a child as the determination factor of Birth is? NOTHING ABOUT THE CHILDS’ MAKEUP OR GROWTH, CHANGES WITH THE CHANGE OF ADDRESS. If Jimmy has 13,876,876,87 cells prior to being ‘born’, and he has 13,876,876.87 cells after he is ‘born’ then what is about Jimmy has changed other than location?

Is where he lives the determining factor? Is the method of receiving nourishment the factor?

Maybe it his or her eye color that is the factor. Maybe that is why, when kids are murdered in the womb, they are allowed to have their bodies hang out of the womb while their heads remain partially inside, as some S.O.B. jabs and prods a tool inside their skull to kill them.

That way, the Doctor doesn’t have to see their face. After all why would he want to see them looking at him. That way, some legal argument is met. That way, at least for a little while, the Doctor can live with himself.

How would it be, to have the job title of executioner?

I wonder, do scientists and abortion Doctors, mount their first kill over their fireplaces?.


TOPICS: Politics; Religion; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; stemcells

1 posted on 07/08/2009 8:49:56 AM PDT by 51773photo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 51773photo

Because of Michelle Obama’s angry faces, I tend to wonder most of the time if it’s because her husband punished her with those 2 girls!!


2 posted on 07/08/2009 8:52:35 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 51773photo

I couldn’t agree more with this article. There is no magic moment when human beings become human. From conception a fetus (I hate that word) is simply a human being in the earliest stages of developement. These are the tiny, innocent babies WORTHY of life and protection.

It makes me sick to think about the lies being perpetrated by the billion-dollar abortion industry with the theme that this “choice” somehow empowers women. This “choice” actually devalues a woman on every level.


3 posted on 07/08/2009 9:51:31 AM PDT by Larightgirl (get rich quick....count your blessings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson