Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Leadership Survey Results
Complete Republican Leadership Survey Results ^

Posted on 06/30/2009 11:13:24 AM PDT by Drew McKissick

For the past few months, we've been running an online survey getting feedback from conservatives about the direction of the Republican Party, its leadership, and choices for a nominee in 2012.  So far, over 5,000 people have participated.

We intend to keep the survey open, promoting it every now and then in our newsletter and via Twitter, to expand the feedback from conservatives, as well as to see how these results might change over time.  From this point forward, we'll try to post updates results at the end of each month.

If you haven't taken the survey yourself, click here to add your voice to the mix.

Summary of survey results so far:


Click here to see the complete results...



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: gop; politics; polls; republicans

1 posted on 06/30/2009 11:13:24 AM PDT by Drew McKissick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Drew McKissick

-————————sound of crickets.........anybody home?


2 posted on 06/30/2009 11:14:45 AM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew McKissick
Romney and Palin lead the pack for 2012.

Romney is the choice of the inside-the-beltway types who took it, Palin is the choice of the grassroots.

3 posted on 06/30/2009 11:18:31 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew McKissick

they got my feedback in one of their prepaid envelopes this morning


4 posted on 06/30/2009 11:21:37 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew McKissick

Sarah Palin is utterly unelectable, and if Mitt Romney is the Republican party nominee, well, it will just be one more election that I will NOT vote Republican.


5 posted on 06/30/2009 11:25:02 AM PDT by SandWMan (Even if you can't legislate morality, you can legislate morally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandWMan
Sarah Palin is utterly unelectable, and if Mitt Romney is the Republican party nominee, well, it will just be one more election that I will NOT vote Republican.

...and it's brain dead people like you that we now have a muslim socialst as president and a fool like franken almost in the senate. Congratulations for standing your ground and showing your just how brilliant you are.

6 posted on 06/30/2009 11:32:11 AM PDT by RVN Airplane Driver ("To be born into freedom is an accident; to die in freedom is an obligation..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandWMan

So, are you going to vote for Obama, again?


7 posted on 06/30/2009 11:42:24 AM PDT by Gator113 (I live in "one of the largest Muslim countries in the world." Imam Obama told me so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Nope, I will likely vote for the Constitution Party candidate. And do so proudly.


8 posted on 06/30/2009 11:43:18 AM PDT by SandWMan (Even if you can't legislate morality, you can legislate morally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SandWMan
Sarah Palin is unelectible, so you are going to vote for the Constitution Party.

Umm, you don't see the little flaw in your logic?

9 posted on 06/30/2009 11:49:09 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SandWMan
Than you are an idiot, you might as well vote for Obama.
10 posted on 06/30/2009 11:58:36 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

No. I’m only saying that Sarah Palin is unelectable. I’m not saying I wouldn’t vote for her for that reason. I may or may not vote for her, I don’t know yet, but am leaning towards no. My comment was mainly aimed at Mitt Romney.

My duty is not to “pick a winner”. It is to vote for the candidate that best aligns with my political positions. This isn’t gambling, it’s voting.

I am not a pragmatist. There’s way too much pragmatism today. Revolutions are not fought, much less won, by pragmatists.


11 posted on 06/30/2009 12:00:46 PM PDT by SandWMan (Even if you can't legislate morality, you can legislate morally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

“Than [sic] you are an idiot, you might as well vote for Obama.”

This is one of the most ridiculous things that I hear people say.

First off, don’t worry, my vote is basically irrelevant anyway. The McCainiac didn’t need my vote last election. It didn’t matter for whom I voted. My state went for McCain with or without me. Also, did you know that there were more people who voted for Ralph Nader the last election than voted for both Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr combined? (sad, but true.) So, no, I didn’t “steal” any votes away from John McAmnesty.

Besides, when you vote for someone, you are basically saying “Good job, I approve of what you are doing”. To vote for the McCainiac would just be encouraging him (and the Republican party) to continue doing what they have been doing.

Who is responsible for electing Barry Soetoro? The American people, who are so foolish, stupid, and uneducated. The people who voted for Obama. The people who voted for “change”. The people at large are responsible. The Republican Party is also responsible, for not providing a candidate that was actually worth voting for.


12 posted on 06/30/2009 12:23:03 PM PDT by SandWMan (Even if you can't legislate morality, you can legislate morally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SandWMan
The refutation that you offer is the most ridiculous things that people who vote third party utter.

You can not change things by voting third party. Because of the way that the presidential elections are structured, a two party system is the only viable system. Third parties are and always will be also rans.

It is much easier to influence one of the existing parties than it is to be involved in a third party in any form what so ever. It would be much better for you to become involved in the local Republican or Democrat parties and influence the choices of those who are put up for office.

That type of activity would actually help to change things, at least it would have a chance to change things.

13 posted on 06/30/2009 12:39:03 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson