Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/22/2009 11:16:08 AM PDT by Shellybenoit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Shellybenoit

There are times when Pat is right on....then there are times when he’s an absolute idiot.

This is one of those times.


2 posted on 06/22/2009 11:17:30 AM PDT by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

Pat Buchanan is like all fruitcakes - you just never know what you are going to get...some good, some bad, some awful...


4 posted on 06/22/2009 11:18:59 AM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

I think Pat Buchanan has lost his marbles he has gone over the deep end!!!! I was for him for President once! Maybe being on MSNBC has rubbed off on him he is almost as bad as Ron Paul!!!


5 posted on 06/22/2009 11:19:59 AM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

what neocons is he referring to? Obama? Michelle? Rahm? Hillary “That Jew Bastard” Clinton? Who? Who? (and no, I am not an owl!).


6 posted on 06/22/2009 11:20:41 AM PDT by MAD-AS-HELL (Hope and Change. Rhetoric embraced by the Insane - Obama, The Chump in Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit
Did some Jewish kid beat up Pat when he was a young, thus scarring him for life? This is a chance to remove The primary troublemaker in the world, but Pat is trying to blame Jews for it? Pat, just STFU.
7 posted on 06/22/2009 11:20:54 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

Anti-semitism is a sure sign of madness.


8 posted on 06/22/2009 11:21:11 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

MSDNC employs Pat Buchanan for the sole reason of misrepresenting the views of the Right.


9 posted on 06/22/2009 11:21:31 AM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

I loathe the guy myself, but you have misrepresented what he said. I went back and watched the vid, and what he said was that the criticism of Obama’s weak response is coming in part from a hawkish pro-Israel set of voices, including Netanyahu, who would welcome a confrontation with Iran to take out it’s nuclear capabilities. I think that’s pretty accurate.


10 posted on 06/22/2009 11:23:55 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit
“Iran Protests Are Tools of Neocons and Israel” Pat is a big broken monkey wrench himself.
11 posted on 06/22/2009 11:25:19 AM PDT by Apercu ("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

I supported Pat for a while, and then he went crazy.


12 posted on 06/22/2009 11:25:24 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

I’m amazed that Ingraham, Hannity, and other conservative talk show hosts give Buchanan time.


14 posted on 06/22/2009 11:28:19 AM PDT by driftless2 (for long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

Pat in the way past seemed normal...not he just seems strange.


18 posted on 06/22/2009 11:32:10 AM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

MSNBC keeps Buchanan on as their token conservative so that all his comments are ascribed to conservatives, generally.

If anyone thinks that liberals don’t see Buchanan as the face and voice of conservatism, they have another thing coming .. rather Machiavellian of MSNBC.

Buchanan is far from MY idea of a conservative .. I’ll stick with Rush any day.


24 posted on 06/22/2009 11:36:02 AM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

Go back to your cage, Pat.


26 posted on 06/22/2009 11:36:37 AM PDT by SIDENET ("Join me or die. Can you do any less?" -Mr. Sparkle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

Pat needs to shut up and learn German, so that he can express himself properly.


27 posted on 06/22/2009 11:38:02 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit
Consistant with his worldview which embraces a peaceful Iran confronted by an aggressive, warlike United States.

'Comrade Wolf' and the mullahs

In the 27 years since the Iranian Revolution, the United States has launched air strikes on Libya, invaded Grenada, put Marines in Lebanon and run air strikes in the Bekaa Valley and Chouf Mountains in retaliation for the Beirut bombing.

We invaded Panama, launched Desert Storm to liberate Kuwait and put troops into Somalia. Under Clinton, we occupied Haiti, fired cruise missiles into Sudan, intervened in Bosnia, conducted bombing strikes on Iraq and launched a 78-day bombing campaign against Serbia, a nation that never attacked us. Then, we put troops into Kosovo.

After the Soviet Union stood down in Eastern Europe, we moved NATO into Poland and the Baltic states and established U.S. bases in former provinces of Russia's in Central Asia.

Under Bush II, we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, though it appears Saddam neither had weapons of mass destruction nor played a role in 9-11.

Yet, in this same quarter century when the U.S. military has been so busy it is said to be overstretched and exhausted, Iran has invaded not one neighbor and fought but one war: an 8-year war with Iraq where she was the victim of aggression. And in that war of aggression against Iran, we supported the aggressor.

Hence, when Iran says that even as we have grievances against her, she has grievances against us, does Iran not have at least a small point? And when Russian President Putin calls Bush's America "Comrade Wolf," does he not have at least a small patch of ground on which to stand?

Comrade Wolf knows whom to eat, it eats without listening and it’s clearly not going to listen to anyone
Vladimir Putin

29 posted on 06/22/2009 11:44:47 AM PDT by SJackson (G-d da*n America, Jeremiah Wright---Don't tell me words don't matter!, Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

Herr Buchanan is a bigoted old yokel. MSNBC sure has found a great jester as “token conservative”.


35 posted on 06/22/2009 11:54:31 AM PDT by SolidWood (Down with the islamic regime! Freedom for Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit
How does a bigot like Pat Buchanan Stay on TV?

He's kept there by leftists who want to make conservatives look bad.

And by and large, that system works.

37 posted on 06/22/2009 11:55:34 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

Here is Buchanan’s full take on the issue:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32301


39 posted on 06/22/2009 12:00:22 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit
"Protest Are Tools of Neocons and Israel"

I wonder if Pat considered Ronald Reagan a neocon and Lech Walesa a tool?

This is from a great link (posted here on FR of cause) to what Walesa said about this.

"In Solidarity
The Polish people, hungry for justice, preferred "cowboys" over Communists."

"When talking about Ronald Reagan, I have to be personal. We in Poland took him so personally. Why? Because we owe him our liberty. This can't be said often enough by people who lived under oppression for half a century, until communism fell in 1989."

" Poles fought for their freedom for so many years that they hold in special esteem those who backed them in their struggle. Support was the test of friendship. President Reagan was such a friend. His policy of aiding democratic movements in Central and Eastern Europe in the dark days of the Cold War meant a lot to us. We knew he believed in a few simple principles such as human rights, democracy and civil society."

At the time Pat kept his opinion to himself, but Ron Paul was one of Reagan's most outspoken critics on this policy.
46 posted on 06/22/2009 12:28:47 PM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson