Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Brief History of the English Language
Scientific Blogging ^ | April 22, 2009 | Patrick Lockerby

Posted on 06/15/2009 6:36:11 AM PDT by decimon

This is part 1 of 6 in a brief series describing the history of English and its grammar.

(Excerpt) Read more at scientificblogging.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Education; History
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/15/2009 6:36:11 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: decimon

It was about the fifth century (AD) that the Angles and the Saxons settled in Britain.
__________________________________________

Then them Yutes came...

And them Yutes didnt talk so good...

They introduced slang into the English Language..

:)


2 posted on 06/15/2009 6:39:53 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

“Between the publication of Johnson’s grammar and the rise of modern descriptive linguistics, grammar was treated as though it had the truth of a science, whereas it was but a series of personal views of language as a form of art. Right through until the 1960s, grammar was used as a hammer in an attempt to beat English into submission. In earlier times, children would leave school with an acquired ‘bookish’ use of English. With the general rise of literacy, children left school with a command of their language derived from authors such as Tennyson, Wordsworth, R.L. Stevenson, Mary Shelley, H.G. Wells, Mark twain, Longfellow, Ella Wheeler Wilcox, Charles Dickens, Lewis Carroll, Rudyard Kipling, Edward Lear and many, many more. These days it is a brave person who will stick their head above the parapet and tell others just how wrong their use of English is, and offer to correct the errors from motives of the purest altruism.”


3 posted on 06/15/2009 6:50:28 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

The English language needs to be adopted as the official language of the United States and that needs to happen now.

Having an official language would mean that immigrants would have to learn the language (as a second language in most cases). English speaking Americans do not need to learn another language unless they frequently travel abroad or need to for business purposes/reasons.

This would be a unifying element for our country, not a divisive one as libtards claim.


4 posted on 06/15/2009 7:17:06 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Southside_Chicago_Republican

Later


5 posted on 06/15/2009 7:19:24 AM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican ("During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." --Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: decimon

.


6 posted on 06/15/2009 7:25:53 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
I have always wonder that if a reasonably literate person from this century went back in time, at what point would one of us be able to have a reasonably understandable conversation in “english” with some one in times past. I tried to read Chaucer as originally written, but it didn't really work for me. I'm going to guess the middle 1500’s. What do you folks think?
7 posted on 06/15/2009 7:30:07 AM PDT by Lockbar (March toward the sound of the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
With the general rise of literacy, children left school with a command of their language derived from authors such as Tennyson, Wordsworth, R.L. Stevenson, Mary Shelley, H.G. Wells, Mark twain, Longfellow, Ella Wheeler Wilcox, Charles Dickens, Lewis Carroll, Rudyard Kipling, Edward Lear and many, many more.

Children didn't go to school. I believe that in Ben Franklin's time literacy was higher than it is today.

The ones who do go to school now are more likely to read Shakespeare than Swift, but no one winds up speaking Shakespearean English. It used to be a mystery to me why Swift's English is so much closer to ours than to Shakespeare even though he is much closer to Shakespeare timewise.

ML/NJ

8 posted on 06/15/2009 7:30:32 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lockbar
I have always wonder that if a reasonably literate person from this century went back in time, at what point would one of us be able to have a reasonably understandable conversation in “english” with some one in times past.

Going by old movies, I'd say the Brits became intelligible some time in the 1950s. ;-)

9 posted on 06/15/2009 7:41:34 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
Children didn't go to school. I believe that in Ben Franklin's time literacy was higher than it is today.

That says so much. To learn more naturally, in some setting other than the prison camp schools, might be the best way to go.

10 posted on 06/15/2009 7:44:47 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

LOL!


11 posted on 06/15/2009 7:52:59 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Yep and day don’t got good grammer.


12 posted on 06/15/2009 7:54:23 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

I think you meant the Jutes. They just kinda schlepped in. Oy, the chutzpah!


13 posted on 06/15/2009 7:56:45 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

“Yutes” as in My Cousin Vinny...

:)


14 posted on 06/15/2009 7:56:53 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Yeppers..

:)


15 posted on 06/15/2009 7:57:36 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Back when they “schlepped” it was spelt with a Y...

Then King James and Shakespear got hold of the vord...

Oy vey...


16 posted on 06/15/2009 7:59:24 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Sure it wasn't the Utes?


17 posted on 06/15/2009 8:06:24 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Them too...

They used their Y’s for wig wams

:)


18 posted on 06/15/2009 8:08:10 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

I may plotz. (lol)


19 posted on 06/15/2009 8:14:59 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

So Y yeren’t they yigyams? Py yumpin’ yiminy!


20 posted on 06/15/2009 12:15:19 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (Free men do not have to ask permission.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson