To: appleseed
It makes you wonder why those who say if women resist they are more likely to be hurt. The statistics aren't even close enough where they could fudge them with different sampling methods or definition changes. Why are they so eager to keep women from resisting that they openly lie about it?
2 posted on
06/14/2009 7:48:57 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
To: KarlInOhio
4 posted on
06/14/2009 7:53:50 PM PDT by
TheZMan
("I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.")
To: KarlInOhio
Why are they so eager to keep women from resisting that they openly lie about it? They want the world to be full of victims, or people who feel like victims. That way, everyone will go running to the government and say "Help me! Help me! I'll pay anything!"
6 posted on
06/14/2009 7:54:10 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(We are a ruled people, serfs to the Federal Oligarchy -- and the Tree of Liberty thirsts)
To: KarlInOhio
Why are they so eager to keep women from resisting that they openly lie about it? Because if you destroy women's self-confidence, and if you can get them to be harmed as a result, you make them fearful victims who will reject personal strength as unreliable and even dangerous. Then their only recourse for perceived safety is the collective, for which they will fight viciously, feeling that their very lives depend upon it's success. And finally, as a result of experiencing all of this manipulation and trauma, they will project their delusional fear into hatred for conservatives as unfeeling evil rapist monsters, and vote Democrat.
8 posted on
06/14/2009 7:58:19 PM PDT by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
To: KarlInOhio
Women who are armed with the truth wouldn’t clamor for more state “protection” for one thing. It’s a rice bowl issue.
And liberals hate self-sufficient women... like Sarah Palin. Somehow I cannot see that happening to her without some considerable damage (or fatalities) to her attackers.
9 posted on
06/14/2009 7:59:06 PM PDT by
coydog
(Proud to have slept through the Obama coronation!)
To: KarlInOhio
> It makes you wonder why those who say if women resist they are more likely to be hurt. The statistics aren’t even close enough where they could fudge them with different sampling methods or definition changes. Why are they so eager to keep women from resisting that they openly lie about it?
That’s easy. Law Enforcement is a self-perpetuating industry. If there are no crimes, there are no criminals. And if there are no criminals, then there is no need to catch them.
10 posted on
06/14/2009 8:02:49 PM PDT by
DieHard the Hunter
(Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fà g am bealach.)
To: KarlInOhio
It makes you wonder why those who say if women resist they are more likely to be hurt. The natural inference from their claim would be that by their definition, women who meekly "lie back and enjoy it" are "not hurt".
13 posted on
06/14/2009 8:11:49 PM PDT by
supercat
(Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
To: KarlInOhio; BykrBayb; HungarianGypsy; little jeremiah; coop71; HollyB; TAdams8591; pandoraou812; ...
It makes you wonder why those who say if women resist they are more likely to be hurt. The irony of it that some people seem incapable of seeing, is that getting raped IS getting hurt.
WTH do they mean, if you resist you might get hurt? If you get raped, you WILL get hurt.
Pass this on to any other lady friends you know on FR, ladies.....
16 posted on
06/14/2009 8:24:48 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: KarlInOhio
If you resist
unsuccessfully of course you will be hurt worse than otherwise. This was put on national display in the Anne Presley case recently
On the other hand, some rapists don't intend to leave witnesses from the git go.
18 posted on
06/14/2009 8:26:03 PM PDT by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson