Later, dearie. You usually put up a better fight than this, this is getting boring.
Posted on 04/08/2009 10:45:53 AM PDT by DrGop0821
Rudy Giuliani discusses attacks on Christianity by both Newsweek and President Obama.
Could anyone imagine if Newsweek had condemned Islam? Oh, right... that would never happen.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativexpress.blogspot.com ...
Rudy Discussed Newsweek's War on Christianity During Holy Week?
So tell me again what does that have to do with fact that McCain locked up 153 delegates in NY and NJ that Rudy had lined up for himself?
:-)
I wasn’t the one who raised these topics on the thread. But somehow, to the Rudy apologists, it’s my fault for calling out clear lies made by them? Absurd. But we’ve gotten used to that from the Rudy crowd. They can rationalize anything to support their guy.
I didn't bring in the topic. But, then again, sticking to facts was never the strong suite of the Rudy boosters.
And you still haven't answered the question as to what the Kerik "dirt" was and what was the proof? You don't seem to be able to do anything but keep calling him "corrupt". How cowardly and pathetic. Paging your little friends to come over and hold your hand is really limp-wristed.
"Their guy?"
Deb was a Duncan Hunter supporter. I was a Fred Thompson supporter. I would have preferred Rudy to McCain myself, and would have voted for him against Barack Obama if he'd been the nominee...because I realized from the outset what a dangerous man Obama was.
They can rationalize anything
A lot of petulant "conservatives" are still attempting to rationalize their third-party votes and non-votes.
They helped elect the only Communist President we've ever had.
Like heck, you are rationalizing away his gun-grabbing efforts, with 'logic' that could be lifted from a Brady Center press release. You can't even keep your bullcrap straight any longer.
And you still haven't answered the question as to what the Kerik "dirt" was and what was the proof? You don't seem to be able to do anything but keep calling him "corrupt".
He pled guilty to corruption, Deb. Case closed.
How cowardly and pathetic.
What is pathetic is having you call me such after I showed that Kerik pled guilty - maybe you could read post 28 instead of just reflexively write your baseless counterattacks.
Paging your little friends to come over and hold your hand is really limp-wristed.
It's also pathetic to lie about me. Please show where I have pinged anyone on this thread other than those involved in the response.
You're a sorry shell of your former self, Deb - resorting to lies and baseless attacks. Won't bother wasting any more time on ya, toodles.
Yep. He accepted a deal from the Bronx district attorney’s office. But he is still facing federal corruption charges including tax fraud and mail fraud.
Other than that, and his ties to organized crime, he's a model citizen. ;-)
Go ahead, coward. Run away. Unfortunately you never had anything to put in your "shell".
Rationalizing the prosecution of corruption as stupid? Talk about pathetic.
Oh, and I'm still waiting for you to show where I pinged anyone. Not that I expect you to have the character to admit your claim was baseless.
Go ahead, coward. Run away.
Run away? Hardly. I've just learned not to waste more time than necessary with amoral political hacks, other than to point out their lack of base convictions. You just rationalized Rudy's gun grabbing with logic straight out of the Brady Center. Downplayed Rudy addressing NARAL. And rationalized corruption. That is what lost Congress for the GOP in 2006 - rationalizing corruption by too many in the party.
Oh, and you might want to stop the Black Knight routine. You still have one functioning leg left, you can still hop away.
Rooty failed to heed the MOST important Rule of Life: "Be careful who you step on on the way up, because you are going to need them on the way down."
This lowlife POS lacerated, stepped on, and sneered at, right to lifers, gun owners, traditional marriage and strong border advocates.
SINGLE ISSUE? The stupid jerk also forgot that "what goes around comes around." One can only imagine how the ex-wife and children Rooty demeaned and discarded stormed heaven for his defeat.
WHO DEFEATED ROOTY? He defeated himself-—by runnng the stupidest campaign in US political history.
He SAID he was “saving himself” for Florida-—trying to avoid the conservatives he despises. Yet he hysterically ran in EVERY primary and caucus state......and LOST.
He campaigned 63 days straight in Fla and came in a distant third.
He ended up spending $63M and got one delegate (that he shared).
"Said" being the keyword. He sent hordes of operatives to NH and only came home with 9% of the vote.
And maybe you have a big, juicy rationalization for Thompson not demanding the continued investigation into the Chinese buying of the Clinton administration.
Thompson showing up at a county fair in Gucci loafers was pretty stupid. No?
Despite his brain dead campaign and complete lack of motivation, I would have never hesitated a second to vote for him.
Neither he or Rudy were my first choices, but I would have raced to vote for them.
Save your milquetoast insults...you're laughable.
He voted yes on one of two impeachment articles. Only one passing would have sufficed to remove Clinton, and the one he voted against had the lower vote total anyway. And I read his reasoning and it was sound - the article was poorly drafted, blame the House Judiciary.
So, like so many others, you omitted the detail that Fred DID vote for one of the articles, and had that passed, Clinton was gone.
As Orwell noted, omission is the most powerful form of lie. Which spinners like you prove all the time with this particular line of attack on Fred.
Oh, and even though I seriously dislike McCain, I voted for him. The point is, these fights went down in the primary, and Rudy got all of one delegate, so it was a moot point. So take an hour and work on your next strawman.
Later, dearie. You usually put up a better fight than this, this is getting boring.
I have to say when I listened to Fred attempting to justify his "no" vote, I couldn't really follow his reasoning. He was obviously trying to have it both ways to preserve his political viability and claim he voted "no" before he voted "yes" on impeachment. What a profile in courage.
I always wanted Thompson to run for President and was really surprised when he wussed out of the Senate and went back to Hollywood after the Democrats concentrated their smear machine on him.
I also have to say both campaigns were equally lame, but it didn't matter, the media and the Democrats wanted to run against McCain so they trivialized and belittled Thompson and trashed Jerry. They used a media blackout against Giuliani. And they got McCain.
You and your little chorus of malcontents can do the Democrats bidding all you want, Giuliani was the only one they feared...and rightly so.
You're kiddin', aren't you?
PS: You already used the Monty Python reference once. Talk about "boring".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.