Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China and Russia Block Any Action Against North Korea in U.N. Security Council - Video 4/5/09
Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | April 5, 2009 | BrianinMO

Posted on 04/05/2009 8:14:02 PM PDT by Federalist Patriot

Here is a video report on the United Nations Security Council Meeting held this afternoon to discuss North Korea's launch of a multi-stage rocket. It does not take rocket scientist (pun intended!) to know that the Security Council could not come to any agreement because China and Russia will not support any kind of punitive measures against North Korea.

President Obama must take action outside the U.N. if he is serious about sending North Korea the message that what they did "broke the rules." But I doubt he will do anything other than push for some meaningless, watered-down statement by the U.N. that will result in an even further emboldened North Korea. . . . . . (Watch Video)

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: china; northkorea; russia

1 posted on 04/05/2009 8:14:02 PM PDT by Federalist Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

No sternly worded letter for you!!!

This makes China and Russia letter Nazis.


2 posted on 04/05/2009 8:16:02 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Oh and Sh*t.


3 posted on 04/05/2009 8:18:31 PM PDT by autumnraine (Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson VIVA LA REVOLUTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Remember Joe Bidens boasting past two years claiming he would fly to NK and put the screws to Kim? It was all empty words.


4 posted on 04/05/2009 8:22:08 PM PDT by sickoflibs (RNC Party Theme : "We may be socialists, but they are Marxists!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
Russia's Medvedev hails "comrade" Obama

Associated Foreign Press (AFP) ^ | April 2, 2009 | Anna Smolchenko

"Russia's Dmitry Medvedev hailed Barack Obama as "my new comrade" Thursday after their first face-to-face talks"

Posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 8:10:15 AM EDT by ETL:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2221410/posts
_____________________________________________________________

From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
_____________________________________________________________

[2009] Russia, China plan new joint military exercises

By MARTIN SIEFF, UPI Senior News Analyst
Published: March 26, 2009

WASHINGTON, March 26 (UPI) -- The continuing tensions over Russia's refusal to sell its state-of-the-art land warfare advanced weapons systems to China hasn't interrupted the rhythm of major joint military exercises between the two major land powers on the Eurasian landmass. The latest in the regular, biennial series of exercises between the two nations has been confirmed for this summer.

The next in the now well-established series of exercises called Peace Mission 2009 will be carried out in northeastern China, the Russian Defense Ministry announced March 18, according to a report carried by the RIA Novosti news agency.

The first bilateral Peace Mission maneuvers -- described at the time as counter-terrorism exercises -- were held in Russia and the eastern Chinese province of Shandong in August 2005. As we reported at that time, they were a lot bigger than mere counter-terrorism exercises. Warships, squadrons of combat aircraft and more than 10,000 troops were involved carrying out landings against hypothetically hostile shores. The maneuvers also involved large-scale paratroops drops. The scale and nature of those exercises suggested a trial run for a possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan with Russian support. ..."

http://www.upi.com/Security_Industry/2009/03/26/Russia_China_plan_new_joint_military_exercises/UPI-25021238094858/
_____________________________________________________________

Russia, China flex muscles in joint war games
August 17, 2007

CHEBARKUL, Russia (Reuters) - Russia and China staged their biggest joint exercises on Friday but denied this show of military prowess could lead to the formation of a counterweight to NATO.

"Today's exercises are another step towards strengthening the relations between our countries, a step towards strengthening international peace and security, and first and foremost, the security of our peoples," Putin said.

Fighter jets swooped overhead, commandos jumped from helicopters on to rooftops and the boom of artillery shells shook the firing range in Russia's Ural mountains as two of the largest armies in the world were put through their paces.

The exercises take place against a backdrop of mounting rivalry between the West, and Russia and China for influence over Central Asia, a strategic region that has huge oil, gas and mineral resources.

Russia's growing assertiveness is also causing jitters in the West. Putin announced at the firing range that Russia was resuming Soviet-era sorties by its strategic bomber aircraft near NATO airspace.
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-29030120070817?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0
_____________________________________________________________

War Games: Russia, China Grow Alliance
September 23, 2005

In foreign policy it’s critical to “know thine enemy.” So American policymakers should be aware that Russia and China are inching closer to identifying a common enemy — the United States.

The two would-be superpowers held unprecedented joint military exercises Aug. 18-25. Soothingly named “Peace Mission 2005,” the drills took place on the Shandong peninsula on the Yellow Sea, and included nearly 10,000 troops. Russian long-range bombers, the army, navy, air force, marine, airborne and logistics units from both countries were also involved.

Moscow and Beijing claim the maneuvers were aimed at combating terrorism, extremism and separatism (the last a veiled reference to Taiwan), but it’s clear they were an attempt to counter-balance American military might.

Joint war games are a logical outcome of the Sino-Russian Friendship and Cooperation Treaty signed in 2001, and reflect the shared worldview and growing economic ties between the two Eastern Hemisphere giants. As the Pravda.ru Web site announced, “the reconciliation between China and Russia has been driven in part by mutual unease at U.S. power and a fear of Islamic extremism in Central Asia.”
http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed092605a.cfm

5 posted on 04/05/2009 8:24:20 PM PDT by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

It is THIS EXACT THING that made us go against the “World” and act outside of the UN. China and Russia would never let anyone defend themselves against little dictactors they could control.

And we know Obama won’t do anything until Daddy UN says it’s ok.


6 posted on 04/05/2009 8:25:51 PM PDT by autumnraine (Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson VIVA LA REVOLUTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

As long as the Obama regime remains in power Russia and China will eat America’s lunch.


7 posted on 04/05/2009 8:26:35 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
Clearly, this is a mistake. Barack Obama pushed the reset button with Russia. (Acutally, Michelle did, using her massively ripped arm and anvil-like pointer finger).

We got a do-over. We're friends now.

Once China and Russia realize how popular it is to be on Obama's side, and how totally George Bush it is to not be on Obama's side, like, wow, they'll TOTALLY be all 'Yeah, for real. We never liked North Korea anyway!'

Right?

8 posted on 04/05/2009 8:26:58 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (Oh, well. Back to the drawing board....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
if he is serious about sending North Korea the message that what they did "broke the rules."

That's it Kim... YOU BROKE THE RULES. Now you have to go sit in time out while everyone else has snack time. If Kim does it again Bammy will make him miss recess!

Sarcasm.... my fallback when something so stupid happens that words fail me.

Obama enters the World Stage...... because for so long we were in want of a Court Jester.

9 posted on 04/05/2009 8:28:16 PM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Oh no! Now we can't call a meeting to schedule a conference to draft a plan to set a date to appoint a committee to suggest alternatives!


10 posted on 04/05/2009 9:39:39 PM PDT by Nick Danger (This post is made of 100% recycled electrons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

How’s that smart power coming along?


11 posted on 04/05/2009 10:13:54 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

China and the “Former” USSR will back their Commie North Korean friends over the West.


12 posted on 04/05/2009 10:31:58 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

This is the on-the-job training that Joe Biden said we don’t have time for.

Is Barry Obama smart enough to learn anything?


13 posted on 04/05/2009 10:41:50 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

McCain urges China to back NKorea sanctions
AFP | 2009-04-06
Posted on 04/06/2009 3:10:21 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2223145/posts


14 posted on 04/06/2009 2:45:39 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson