Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Tom Tancredo Says Jindal Speech May Have Ended His Chances for Presidency - Video 2/26/09
Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | February 26, 2009 | BrianinMO

Posted on 02/26/2009 12:33:56 PM PST by Federalist Patriot

Here is video of Rep. Tom Tancredo assessing the performance the other night of Gov. Bobby Jindal in giving the GOP Response to President Barack Obama's address. In short, Tancredo says Jindal's content was great but his delivery was lousy. In fact, he says it was so lousy that his performance may have "put the last nail in the coffin" on his chances of becoming President. Tancredo says Jindal is a great intellect but did not show himself to be a "leader" in his speech.

Tancredo believes Gov. Mitt Romney is best positioned now to lead the GOP forward in 2012. Tancredo made the comments during an interview at CPAC today, February 26, 2009.

As I said the other night, I believe Jindal's content was great but his delivery certainly could have been better. But I just don't think that speech will end Jindal's chances for the Presidency. He still has a very bright future, and could be the next GOP President in 2016 if not in 2012. Remember, everyone laughed off Bill Clinton after his disastrous speech at the Democratic Convention in 1988 that went on and on and on. But four years later, he became President. Four years is a very long time in politics. I would not count Jindal out just yet. . . . . (Watch Video)

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: jindal; romney; tancredo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: Federalist Patriot

Who can stand in front of a camera with no audience and rebut the sitting President who had two cheerleaders sitting behind and to the right and left of him, over his shoulders? Pelosi was a jill in the box, jumping up and clapping like a child at a birthday party.

Gov Jindal did fine for where he was and what he had to say.

But I’d have preferred Gov Palin . . . she’s an exciting speaker and leader.

Gotta write Michael Steele (my parents live in Maryland and my Dad says he’s a solid conservative Republican) about that, I guess.

Romney is too 2008. His chance was then, not now and not in the future, other than holding a Cabinet Post. He should work FOR younger Republican leaders to get the nod to be the Republican Presidential Elect in 2012 and make himself invaluable as an adviser to Republican candidates.


41 posted on 02/26/2009 12:52:59 PM PST by HighlyOpinionated (The Constitution & Bill of Rights stand as a whole. Remove any part & nullify the whole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Tancredo afraid of the big bad Jindal?

Starting early aren’t we?


42 posted on 02/26/2009 12:53:50 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (Welcome to Obama's America... Be afraid, be very afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat


Someone's been playing too much Deus Ex... Rhodes scholars are not automatically "evil illuminati conspirators."
43 posted on 02/26/2009 12:54:10 PM PST by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Now... count me one of those who think the speech was a big old flop, but this is going WAY too far. First of all, forget four years—four WEEKS is a long time in politics these days. Secondly, there was no disastrous sound bite for the media to use against him for years to come. It was the overall tone that was the problem, and “overall tone” is way too vague too ruin a career. Thirdly, and most importantly, Jindal has infinite opportunities to live this down—because he’s a man with a real job who will continue to be visible for things that matter. At 37, with the intellect and resume he has already (and the wit and charm I’ve seen him display on other occasions), he has time to polish his delivery.


44 posted on 02/26/2009 12:54:16 PM PST by FelixFelicis (When can we *change* back? [Get yer bumper sticker at www.cafepress.com/deepright!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

He didn’t read the spendilous bill, and he probably didn’t hear the speech.


45 posted on 02/26/2009 12:55:27 PM PST by chemicalman (Government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem. (R.R.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Oh, and if this party is even thinking about nominating waffly old Mitt “Plastic” Romney 2012, it’s too stupid to run the country anyway.


46 posted on 02/26/2009 12:56:48 PM PST by FelixFelicis (When can we *change* back? [Get yer bumper sticker at www.cafepress.com/deepright!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

But he WAS born in the United States, right?

I’m asking seriously. I have been assuming he was, but I really don’t know.


47 posted on 02/26/2009 12:57:35 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Not to mention a coward, eh, ;>


48 posted on 02/26/2009 12:57:38 PM PST by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter

You know what they say: You don’t HAVE to be a Rhodes Scholar to be an evil illuminati conspirator, but it HELPS!!

;^)


49 posted on 02/26/2009 12:58:55 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

that’s why I want Palin/Jindal in 2012


50 posted on 02/26/2009 12:59:22 PM PST by CharlieOK1 (Don't blame me, I voted for Sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
Does Jindal display the fire and ability to speak that would invigorate the base. No! He is a great conservative and has done very well for LA.

Does Palin have the stature to look Presidential. Is she quick and could fire up the base. No! She is one of the best Governors and conservatives in the US now. I have great admiration for this women.

Ok, where do we go. Nothing on the horizon looks Presidential, speaks Presidential, and has total conservative principals to get a Republican. Everyone bitches on way or another on anyone that could run. That is why Obama won was the lack to get behind McCain even if we did not go with all his policies. Look where we are now. I could say more, but its like talking to our brain dead.

51 posted on 02/26/2009 12:59:36 PM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

I guess this means Tancredo is running again!


52 posted on 02/26/2009 12:59:52 PM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Romney my a**. Palin and Jindal are the two best hopes we have for the republican party. Granted, Jindal didn’t speak well tuesday night, but he can fix that. I have never been impressed with his speaking ability but really like his conservative ideas and the content of tuesdays speech. Romney is a dead duck and another sure loss for conservatives!


53 posted on 02/26/2009 1:00:09 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

Oh, did I leave that out? I’m sorry.

Yes, definitely. Also a coward.

;^)


54 posted on 02/26/2009 1:00:10 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Jindal claims to have been born in Louisiana, but I have not seen a birth certificate.

However, there are many who cite common law which states that in order to be a natural born citizen, both parents must have been U.S. citizens at the time of a person’s birth.


55 posted on 02/26/2009 1:01:44 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

And everyone thought Bill Clinton’s speech to the 1988 Democratic convention was terrible. It ran so long, that when he addressed the 1992 convention, he started by saying “thanks for inviting me back to finish my speech” or similar words.

Frankly, I haven’t talked to one person — outside of political wonks — who watched his speech. The only people who watch the rebuttals are the political junkies who are almost never swayed...they’re Dems or Reps and vote straight ticket. No one in the broad middle who only pays attention in election season watch the opposing responses.


56 posted on 02/26/2009 1:01:52 PM PST by Cousin Eddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Hey, it looks good on any resume, and I do hear that it cuts down on the quota of innocent civilians you need to have killed in order to be accepted as a loyal illuminatus.


57 posted on 02/26/2009 1:02:38 PM PST by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

In fact, he says it was so lousy that his performance may have “put the last nail in the coffin” on his chances of becoming President.


Tancredo should know a little about the ‘coffin nails’ based upon his policital wins/losses. One speech isn’t a make or break this far out for someone aged 37.


58 posted on 02/26/2009 1:02:41 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter

Yes.

It’s 5 instead of 50, or something like that, right?


59 posted on 02/26/2009 1:03:51 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
They definitely ain't got no couth!

We are presently in "rebuild" and they want to start dumping Conservatives overboard.

Is it possible we have a new pool of RINOs to fight?

60 posted on 02/26/2009 1:03:54 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson