Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What's in the Stimulus?: An Earmark as Big as the Ritz
the corner ^ | 2/5/2009 | Mark Hemingway

Posted on 02/06/2009 4:16:59 AM PST by shove_it

Buried in the 800 page stimulus bill is this seemingly innocuous allocation — well it's inocuous relative to a $1 trillion stimulus bill anyway — "$2,000,000,000 is available for one or more near zero emission powerplant(s).”

Interstingly enough, there's no such thing as a "near zero emission powerplant" — yet. The Bush administration had been planning to try and build the first of its kind in Mattoon, Illinois as part of the FutureGen project. The Department of Energy scuttled the project last year in part due to rising costs. The project was to be done as a part of a public-private alliance with the DOE picking up 74 percent of the projected $1.8 billion price tag, compared to initial estimates of $950 million.

Further, technological advancements had made the project obsolete. In a letter to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, headlined "New technology makes FutureGen a waste of tax money," then Secretary of Energy, Samuel W. Bodman, wrote:

The project's estimated cost has almost doubled and innovations in technology and changes in the marketplace have created other viable options for demonstrating carbon capture and storage on a commercial scale. That diminished the need for a demonstration project.

It became clear the Department of Energy could not, in good conscience, continue to support the program. The likelihood that it would fail, leaving the American people with hundreds of millions of dollars in sunk cost and none of the benefits, is not acceptable.

An MIT report concluded "the U.S. government begin thinking about such a portfolio of demonstration projects and not be singularly focused on any one project such as FutureGen." And the Washington Post editorial board also concluded the technology was "prohibitively expensive."

So in effect the inclusion of $2 billion for a near zero emissions powerplant amounts to a staggering earmark — one that's nine times the cost of the bridge to nowhere. It's also substantially larger than Congress' previous earmark record of $1.5 billion for the DC metro system last year.

After FutureGen was abandoned, disgraced Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich paid Cassidy and Associates, a major Washington, D.C. lobbying firm, $468,000 in public funds to lobby to restart the project. The Illinois delegation in Congress has also been pushing hard for the FutureGen earmark, despite the fact that the Obama administration has been vocal about their opposition to earmarks in the stimulus, and has even specfically said they are oppposed to including funding for FutureGen in the bill.

The Wall Street Journal estimates that the FutureGen would generate about 2,675 new jobs — and only 150 of those are permanent. Congress would be spending just shy of $750,000 per new job.

The language is still in the stimulus, though Senator Tom Coburn — the Van Helsing of earmark hunters — has introduced an amendment (#108) to strike the FutureGen funding from the bill.

02/05 06:27 PM


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: energy; futuregen; porkulus

1 posted on 02/06/2009 4:16:59 AM PST by shove_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shove_it

There is no telling what a close reading of that Pork bill will find.


2 posted on 02/06/2009 4:25:41 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Somebody mentioned yesterday that there was NO funding in the stimulus bill for nuclear power plants. Of all the sources of energy we have at our disposal NOW nuclear offers the quickest way to reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources. Yes, there is a problem with the waste, but at least we can store it someplace until we find a way to do something better with it. OTOH, with our current plants we just spew the waste into the air. And, although I’m convinced that’s not as big a problem as the global warming alarmists claim, it gives the environmentalists one more thing to bitch about.


3 posted on 02/06/2009 4:38:25 AM PST by jwparkerjr (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Obama is the Bridge to Nowhere!

Pray for America, Our Troops and obama’s Guidance


4 posted on 02/06/2009 5:13:39 AM PST by bray (Honest Sarah vs Oblago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it; pharmamom

Further down The Corner is a link to this gem:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEDIyztZGBA

Best sendup of the stimulus EVER.


5 posted on 02/06/2009 5:19:04 AM PST by George Smiley (They're not drinking the Kool-Aid any more. Now they're eating it straight out of the packet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George Smiley

Good one! HAHAHA

Consult your senator if your stimulus lasts less than four hours.


6 posted on 02/06/2009 5:32:41 AM PST by shove_it (and have a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Barack’s Big Earmarks. Nice, memorable visual associated with that one, lol.


7 posted on 02/06/2009 5:48:25 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson