Posted on 01/04/2009 9:23:32 AM PST by MelSmith
I strongly doubt the justices give these letters more than a cursory glance. I doubt they even read them at all.
Wow! You don't know about the Electoral College, do you? You should read our Constitution.
Anyway, this is not about what the people want, as you mischaracterize it, it's about BO concealing his birth documenation so that we don't find out he was born in Kenya. Once he discloses all his birth documenation, this matter can be resolved.
Berg has nothing to do with a birth certificate...this is the natural born nonsense. I still say SCOTUS is looking to kill this permanently.
You are 100% wrong. Berg's case is largely built on the assertion that BO was born in Kenya, and that BO does not, in fact, have a birth certificate showing he was born in HI (and therefore is not a "natural born citizen").
Please advise: are you misinformed or misinforming?
Yeah sure, everyone who refuses to follow this 911 conspiracy theorist in his quest to have his case heard for the 4th time is an Obama operative. Do some research on this guy and his case. He is an embarrassment to everyone who is associated with him. His case is a joke, which isn’t supported by evidence.
I am almost convinced he is working for the Dems by trying to get Republicans to look like complete idiots by following his cases. Keeps the enemy occupied while they give away trillions of taxpayer money. Just to save you the trouble, I am not an Obama operative, I just have an affinity for logic and evidence.
So, ga medic, in your quest for "logic and evidence" you oppose the people's right to examine BO's birth documentation. Please explain how that is logical.
The avialable evidence is that he was born in Kenya.
How many Obama trolls are here trying to propagandize against seeing BO's birth documentation?
I will send my nine letters. I feel I have to at least try to do something. Obama is hiding many parts of his little life. He has been aided and abetted by many in his journey to the Presidency.
Unfortunately, I’m afraid that the SCOTUS will follow the path of least resistance and avoid all controversy by looking the other way while a Kenyan usurper takes the office of POTUS.
The Berg case is not about Obama concealing his birth records. Read the facts on his case. His claims are weak as are his arguments. By supporting the weakest of the cases against Obama the right has prevented the real cases with legitimate claims from seeing the light of day. The facts and legal arguments made by Berg do not hold water, and they are not based on the reasons most posters on this thread feel Obama is ineligible. There are compelling arguments, but none of those are the basis of the Berg case.
As for you personal attack, you intentionally twist what I said and ignore the truth behind my statement.
I say again that the Supreme Court should not be basing decisions on the volume of letters they get on an issue. Had they done so with the 2000 election they would have found in Gore’s favor. What people are asking for here is exactly what Gore wanted in 2000. That is for the Supreme Court to ignore the law.
Has it occurred to you that the reason the Berg case (a case brought by a leftist) has been pushed to the forefront is to completely discredit all those who question Obama’s eligibility? Berg is a 9/11 truther who we suddenly embrace? I don’t think so.
Perhaps, so what are you going to do about it Wring your hands??I wrote letters to SCOTUS and copied my Congresmen.? Go to ObamaCrimes.com for instructions.
I certainly hope they don’t. There is a reason the Founding Fathers did not subject the Supreme Court to election by the public. Their job should be to base decisions on the law. That often means making decisions the majority of the public will dislike.
In the future, please note:
1). The Activism sidebar is reserved for News/Activism of the FR chapters.
2). Content from this website belongs in Bloggers.
Thanks,
In any case, the objective is simple: force a disclosure of Obama's birth documentation -- everything else is a smokescreen created by the Obama cultists.
So, if the plantiff in Berg v. Obama issues an urgent call to action for letters to the Supreme Court Justices, that is *not* activism? Then indeed I did not understand.
Read his filing. The guy cites freaking Wikipedia! The filing is pathetic and would be laughed out of almost any court. He doesn’t even provide evidence for any of his claims. The whole filing is basicially “I read on the Internet...” (kind of like his 9/11 filings). And his few legal arguments have been made in other cases over the years and already found to be incorrect.
It’s a rope-a-dope to keep the real issues from seeing the light of day, and Republicans are falling for it.
Believe me, I'm the LAST person that would "wring my hands" about it.
I seriously doubt that SCOTUS reads correspondence sent to them, but Congressmen had better read and react to continuous public pressure. I do think that continuing to question 0bama's qualifications through continuous lawsuits and legal actions to the SCOTUS might eventually yield results.
Disregard these following posters:
- bronxboy
- slaphappypappy
- non-sequitur
Known and longtime trolls who simply try to confuse the issues and do their best to get under us “truthers” skin. Their posts are meaningless and harmless, just read over them and disregard them. Take them for what they are - obama trolls still drinking the koolaid (or still on the payroll).
Riiight...
Anyone who disagrees with you is a troll who should be disregarded.
Read my posts. I actually do think there are legitimate reasons to challenge Obama’s eligibility. But I have also read Berg’s filings, as well as numerous opinions of those filings, and they are remarkably weak. I would much prefer someone, for example, get a copy of the alleged Kenyan birth certificate and/or hospital records and actually base an argument on that. Instead Berg just says some reporter says he found them, but doesn’t actually supply the evidence.
Maybe some of us are tired of watching Republicans shooting themselves in the foot by embracing any kook that we think might help us out. It’s much like the Coleman fiasco. If Minnesota Republicans hadn’t embraced the man who chaired Clinton’s 1996 state campaign we probably wouldn’t be facing the reality of Senator Franken.
That eliminates you, b-boy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.