The Berg case is not about Obama concealing his birth records. Read the facts on his case. His claims are weak as are his arguments. By supporting the weakest of the cases against Obama the right has prevented the real cases with legitimate claims from seeing the light of day. The facts and legal arguments made by Berg do not hold water, and they are not based on the reasons most posters on this thread feel Obama is ineligible. There are compelling arguments, but none of those are the basis of the Berg case.
As for you personal attack, you intentionally twist what I said and ignore the truth behind my statement.
I say again that the Supreme Court should not be basing decisions on the volume of letters they get on an issue. Had they done so with the 2000 election they would have found in Gore’s favor. What people are asking for here is exactly what Gore wanted in 2000. That is for the Supreme Court to ignore the law.
Has it occurred to you that the reason the Berg case (a case brought by a leftist) has been pushed to the forefront is to completely discredit all those who question Obama’s eligibility? Berg is a 9/11 truther who we suddenly embrace? I don’t think so.
In any case, the objective is simple: force a disclosure of Obama's birth documentation -- everything else is a smokescreen created by the Obama cultists.