Maybe they only have a small sampling of “supportive fossils” because the in between fossils do not exist.
Every year paleontologists dig up new "in between fossils" which until then did "not exist." Who can say how many more "in between fossils" they will eventually find?
More to the point, how many would they HAVE to find, before even the most skeptical will admit the basic idea?
After 150 yrs of lifetimes looking for transitory fossils, shouldn’t they have found some? After all the one who found it would be as famous as Darwin, yet nada. Maybe they don’t really exist.
Pray for W, America and Our Troops