Posted on 12/31/2008 4:33:55 PM PST by dascallie
On Friday, I guess we will see what the contents reveal ( the word is, it is stated within the language of the decree that the couple "have" one son of the union (Obama Jr), born in KENYA.)
If true, this will be a blockbuster revelation, recored on a legal document.
We will see.
-------------------------------------------------------------
IP: 98.206.74.240
Dec 31st, 2008 - 4:27 PM Re: URGENT: PLEASE BROADCAST THIS EVERYWHERE
Ed Hale has announced that the Divorce Decree of ObamaSr and Dunham will be posted on Friday, January 2nd. Tonight at 7:45 pm cst Ed will be on with Bobby and Mark to discuss more details.
Thanks, patriot08!
But can anyone shed any light on what this means, if anything?
Or do we just not know yet?
It is not ridicule.
It is simply a suggestion to go after BHO on real issues regarding his policies and connections to corruption.
Chasing after conspiracies along with Berg, the API and an assortment of other frauds is not all that productive and puts you in the same camp with the nut jobs who think that Bush and Cheney were responsible for the Attack on the WTC.
Wrong divorce - Soetoro.
Chasing after conspiracies along with Berg, the API and an assortment of other frauds is not all that productive and puts you in the same camp with the nut jobs who think that Bush and Cheney were responsible for the Attack on the WTC.
I really take offense at that statement.
You are equating the possibility that Obama may have lied about his birthplace with the possibility that George W Bush killed 3,000 of his fellow citizens.
No. That is the divorce decree from Stanley Ann’s last divorce from LoLo.
Ed has the divorce decree from Stanley Ann/Obama Sr. and will announce its contents tonight on plainsradio.
He let some see it but we cannot divulge the contents.
However, Phil Berg who has been leading the case against Obama’s status as a natural born citizen has wrote the he wants to see Bush and Cheney prosecuted for murder for the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks.
I’m not a nut job— and I don’t believe I or others trying to get to the bottom of the eligibility issue puts us in the same category as 911 conspiracy advocates.
So careful with your sweeping indexing. It is wrong.
As to connections to corruption, Obama has a legion of them—take your pick, the eligibility issue and the assortment of players, agencies, funds to block the truth is a glaring example of one that carries potentially tremendous implications.
Does it not concern you that the man simply will not present his birth certificate to quiet this rumbling, and instead invests great sums of money to conceal it?
Is that not, on it’s face, the single most revealing and damning aspect of this entire fiasco?
Where do you ‘file’ that?
Are you saying that Phil Berg is not a 9/11 Truther?
I haven’t dug into Berg’s particular idiosyncracies. I’ve heard something about that, but haven’t made it my business to verify. I don’t care.
It is a red herring anyway, he is not the reason I stay interested in this, he is a cog of many cogs.
You did not answer my primary question.
Why are you not concerned that Barack Obama operatives have invested great sums of money, time and gyrations to block the presentation of a simple birth certificate?
Phil Berg ... has wrote the he wants to see Bush and Cheney prosecuted for murder for the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks.
That is unfortunate. And, believe me, you won’t find a bigger “W” supporter anywhere.
And I’m a Democrat!
But your logic doesn’t make sense to me.
Berg has been wrong in the past, so that means he’ll always be wrong?!
I’ve been wrong before, haven’t you?
I’m not always wrong.
I’m one of those who really has resigned myself to Obama’s ascension as our president.
But I don’t see anything wrong to seeing this through to fruition.
And if we fail, and we probably will, I’ll be right there critisizing Obama if he tries to move this country too far to the left.
Who cares what Berg has done in the past. We (I) are revved up about what he is doing now. If you don’t like it, go away. We will not miss you, I promise.
You should care. He is a major source of conspiracy theories and is renowned for promulgating them and for initiating lawsuits in the name of them. If he is one of your sources of information, you should check him out. This is a guy who went to the courts on his delusional belief that the Bush administration was responsible for 9/11. Wouldn't it be prudent to question such a source?
It is a red herring anyway, he is not the reason I stay interested in this, he is a cog of many cogs.
It is not a red herring. He's a major source of misinformation. Check all the cogs.
I wish I could say the same for other Hawaii documents posted on the web...
-PJ
I try to be objective in my views and prefer to back up my opinions with evidence that can be documented. Thus far I have not seen evidence that Obama has spent millions of dollars fighting to keep his birth certificate hidden.
If you could find such documentation, that would be very appreciated.
And as far as I can tell there has not been a single Republican Governor, Congressman or Senator that has questioned Obama's NBC Status.
And if there were a legitimate question regarding such status there are checks and ballences in place to stop an unqualified candidate for assuming the office. And thus far, not a single member of the Electoral College, the Vice President or the SCOTUS has shown any concern regarding Obama's Constitutional qualifications.
I’ve been posting updates at RosettaSister, so I thought I would here, too.
Hope that’s alright.
http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2009/01/obama-divorce-papers-via-plainsradiocom.html
The Barack Hussein Obama Sr. / Stanley Ann divorce papers are in the posstion of Ed Hale and PlainsRadio.com. I.O. will likely be making numerous updates in this posting, as the afternoon and evening proceed.
2:25pm CT - Ed Hale has his FedEx package and has made sure that among others, attorney, Stephen Pidgeon is getting a copy. PlainsRadio.com is to post it for public view at 8pm CT, tonight. Ed and others will be ‘net audio-wise, too, as previously mentioned.
Please, as I’ve said hundreds of times by now, anyone can post anything on the Internet, and it means nothing. If you are willing to settle for that document, that doesn’t tell you anything, I have a bridge for sale that you might be interested in. I don’t care about the Berg case or what Berg acknowledges or not, but I do know that Obama’s birth documents have not been made public for any kind of official examination. What happened to the transparency he promised? Even the meaningless, Internet document is considered a fraud by many document experts. Obama’s mother was to young to have conferred citizenship to Obama, if he was born outside the US, which I believe he was, and as for your asinine apology, we all lose when the Constitution ceases to mean anything, even in a superficial way. Winning or losing has nothing to do with this, but obviously, that subtle point escapes you, as do a great many things, if your writing is an indication of what you know.
YAWN .... (not you) the idea that somebody’s going to post something on the internet and that’s it for Obama, they got what’s his name is Chicago on tape selling a senate see and he’ll do no time.
“Law, What law? Out here I am the law?”
— Burt Reynolds
Now you are show your true colors.
“Thus far I have not seen evidence that Obama has spent millions of dollars fighting to keep his birth certificate hidden.”
COME ON.
I did not say “millions” by the way. Another attempt to obsficate the core issue.
It is more simple than pie to show a birth certificate isn’t it. Why spend one red nickle to block it, eh? Like McCain did, easy as pie.
You are shedding your guise my friend. You certainly are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.