[dascallie]

I’m not a nut job— and I don’t believe I or others trying to get to the bottom of the eligibility issue puts us in the same category as 911 conspiracy advocates.

So careful with your sweeping indexing. It is wrong.

As to connections to corruption, Obama has a legion of them—take your pick, the eligibility issue and the assortment of players, agencies, funds to block the truth is a glaring example of one that carries potentially tremendous implications.

Does it not concern you that the man simply will not present his birth certificate to quiet this rumbling, and instead invests great sums of money to conceal it?

Is that not, on it’s face, the single most revealing and damning aspect of this entire fiasco?

Where do you ‘file’ that?

[trumandogz]

...I don’t believe I or others trying to get to the bottom of the eligibility issue puts us in the same category as 911 conspiracy advocates.

Are you saying that Phil Berg is not a 9/11 Truther?