‘Go to hell, creationists!’ (Evo tolerance in action)

CMI ^ | December 30, 2008 | Carl Wieland

[GodGunsGuts]

Information scientist, author and evangelist, Dr Werner Gitt, a close friend of CMI, told us that on 23 October 2008 he was subjected to the most strident opposition he had ever encountered...

[NinoFan]

Looked at them and I just don’t see it.

[DevNet]

If you are willing to sign an NDA and fly in I will be willing to show you the code. My standard rate for such actions will apply as well.

[Sam's Army]

"If you are willing to sign an NDA and fly in I will be willing to show you the code. My standard rate for such actions will apply as well."

Wow! You're so important that you have a "standard rate for such actions"? LOL!!!!

[DevNet]

Yes. Consultants tend to have such things.

It is called hourly + expenses.

Even the guy running the mobile detail outfit down the street can quote you a standard rate.

[Sam's Army]

Ohh a "Consultant", eh? Usually a synonym for "Unemployed".

[DevNet]

Childish.

[Sam's Army]

Yeah, kind of like making false claims of something you “copyrighted”.

[DevNet]

All IP in the US is copyrighted the moment it is created.

[ColdWater]

What are honesty and decency?

Honesty in posting is not starting or perpetuating falsehoods. Decency in posting is not making personal attacks but staying on subject.

[Fichori]

“Then show me how he has used force to stop the debate.”

That is besides the point.

The point being that you switched terms.

I was merely calling your card trick.

[DevNet]

Yet you refuse to speak out against the even worse misstatements of others.

[Fichori]

“Yet you refuse to speak out against the even worse misstatements of others.”

Aww, quit yer whining.

The low fruit always gets picked first.

[DevNet]

First implies that you will now call them on their actions. When to you expect such actions to take place?

[Fichori]

“Do you believe that someone who disagrees with you on Gen 2:7 can be a Christian?”

If Genesis 2:7 is not literal and true, then none of Genesis is literal and true, and there is no need for Christ to have died and there is nothing to be redeemed from.

So, can someone who disagrees with John 3:16 be a Christian?

[tacticalogic]

If Genesis 2:7 is not literal and true, then none of Genesis is literal and true, and there is no need for Christ to have died and there is nothing to be redeemed from.

Can anything in the Bible be held not literal and true, and what methodology do you use to determines that?

[Fichori]

“Do you believe the earth orbits the sun or does the sun orbit the earth?” [excerpt]

Pathetic canard.

[DevNet]

What is your answer to that question?

[Fichori]

“Can anything in the Bible be held not literal and true, and what methodology do you use to determines that?”

Hermeneutics.

[Fichori]

“First implies that you will now call them on their actions. When to you expect such actions to take place?”

If you want me to go get a stepladder and pick the fruit at the top of the tree, your gona have to cough up some dough.

The stuff I can reach while sitting in a lawn chair, I pick for free.

[Fichori]

Both.